Functional Outcome Change Over 10 Years After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: To assess any clinically important difference in functional outcome over 10 years after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A prospective registry-based observational cohort study including 309 patients older than 60 years who underwent primary TKA. Patients were assessed at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 postoperative years with the Knee Society scores (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Clinically important improvement was defined according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Patients were also categorized as type A (unilateral knee osteoarthritis), type B (bilateral knee osteoarthritis) or type C (various sites of osteoarthritis). RESULTS: The mean age at the TKA surgery was 69.2 (SD 7.3) years, 197 (63.7%) were women.Maximum postoperative improvements in functional scores occurred at 3 postoperative years, remained relatively stable up to 5-year. There were significant decreases in all KSS and WOMAC scores at 7-year follow-up (P = .001), remained stable up to 10-year. At 10-year, functional scores were significantly higher than preoperatively (P = .001). Differences between maximum scores at 3-year and those at 10-year were significantly lesser than MCID in all scores (P = .001). In multivariate analysis, type-C patient at TKA surgery was the only significant predictor of unsuccessful KSS score and dissatisfaction at 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Primary TKA provides clinically important improvements in functional and quality of life outcomes over 10-year follow-up compared to preoperatively. Although there were statistically significant declines in KSS and WOMAC scores from 3 to 10 years, the differences were lesser than the MCID.

A relevant number of patients do not increase their engagement in physical, social and leisure activities at the medium-term after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in engagement in physical, leisure and social activities in older adults following primary TKA. METHODS: A prospective study of 106 patients with a mean age of 72.6 (SD 7.4) years undergoing primary TKA was performed. Physical, social and leisure activities performed by the patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 3-year were recorded. Activities were selected according to the age, and grouped as passive, moderate and high intensity. The energy spent in each activity was expressed in Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) units. Charlson Comorbidity Index, Mini-mental test and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores were also used. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of active patients. RESULTS: Mean WOMAC significantly improved from preoperative (34.8, SD 11.8) to final follow-up (74.4, SD 11.1) (p = 0.001), and the mean energy spent increased from 10.7 (SD 13.6) to 28.2 (SD 16.2) MET-hour weekly (p = 0.001) with a decrease in the passive activities and increase in the moderate activities. However, the participation in high-intensity activities according to age was negligible. Only 65 (61.3%) patients were considered active postoperatively (weekly spending ≥ 40 MET), although the WOMAC scores were not significantly different between active and sedentary patients. Active patients compared with sedentary patients had a significant increase in engagement in physical, social and leisure activities, and a decrease in passive activities. Female gender (p = 0.037), less preoperatively participation in passive activities (p = 0.042), and greater participation in social activities (p = 0.027) were significant predictors of active patients at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Overall, most patients increased their activity level postoperatively. However, 38.6% of patients had no increased engagement in moderate physical, social or leisure activities at the medium-term despite improvements in pain and function provided by TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Change in 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery over the last decade in a European population.

OBJECTIVE: There are scarce data on the mortality after hip fracture surgery for patients treated in the most recent years. The objective of this study was to analyze whether the overall initiatives introduced over the last decade for elderly patients with hip fractures had a positive impact on the 1-year mortality. METHODS: Patients treated during 2010-2012 were compared with patients treated during 2018-2020 for all-cause 1-year mortality. Variables influencing mortality were collected based on the literature, including demographic, comorbidity, cognitive status, and preinjury physical function. Crude mortalities were compared between periods, as well as with the expected mortality in the general population adjusted for age, gender, and year of surgery using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). A multivariate model was used to identify mortality risk factors. RESULTS: 591 patients older than 65 years were treated during 2010-2012 and 642 patients during 2018-2020. The mean age increased significantly between periods (78.9 vs. 82.6 years, respectively, p = 0.001) in both genders, together with an increase in comorbidity (p = 0.014). The in-hospital mortality risk had no significant difference between periods (2.5 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.339), but the 30-day mortality risk (8.3 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.031) and 1-year mortality risk (16.1 vs. 11.9%, p = 0.023) declined significantly. However, 1-year mortality in 2020 had an excess of 1.33 in SMR. Age older than 80 years, male gender, and Charlson comorbidity index > 2 were significant predictors of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: The important evolution achieved in the last decade for the management of patients with hip fracture surgery has led to a significant decline in 1-year mortality, but the 1-year mortality remains significantly higher compared to the general population of similar age and gender.

No influence of posterior tibial slope change on outcomes after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the functional outcomes were affected by the change in posterior tibial slope (PTS) after using a predetermined PTS for primary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 152 patients who underwent primary CR-TKA with a standardized PTS of 5º regardless of the native PTS. Patients were classified postoperatively in two ways. Firstly, according to the PTS change from preoperative to postoperative (increased or decreased PTS group). Secondly, according to the PTS difference between preoperative and postoperative ≤ 4º (group A) and > 4º (group B). The functional outcomes were assessed with the Knee Society Scores (KSS), McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM). Preoperative and postoperative PTS were measured on lateral knee radiographs. RESULTS: The minimum follow-up was 5 year. There were no significant differences at the final follow-up in functional outcomes between increased (88 patients) and decreased (64 patients) PTS groups. Likewise, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between group A (79 patients) and group B (73 patients). In multivariate analysis, the PTS change was not significant predictor for improvement in functional outcome (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.70-1.40; p = 0.061). CONCLUSION: The PTS change between preoperative and postoperative has no influence on the functional outcomes using a CR-TKA. A standardized PTS regardless of the native is a reliable procedure for primary CR-TKA.

Similar outcomes of constrained condylar knee and rotating hinge prosthesis in revision surgery for extension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Instability is one of the most common reasons for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Constrained prosthesis can be used for significant ligamentous laxity, but there is not much evidence on the appropriate level of restriction for unstable varus-valgus TKA. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome and survival at a minimum follow-up of five years between rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK) and constrained condylar knee prosthesis (CCK) for extension instability following primary TKA. HYPOTHESIS: For symptomatic extension instability after primary TKA, good functional outcomes and survival can be achieved with both designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with unstable primary TKA who underwent revision with either RHK (n=34) or CCK (n=30) were retrospectively compared. Assessments were performed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was made. Complications and re-operations were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean post-operative follow-up was 10.3 (range 5-16) years for both groups. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in the KSS-knee (p=0.228) or KSS-function (p=0.324) score, VAS-pain (p=0.563), VAS-satisfaction (p=0.780), major complication rate (p=0.194), or TKA survival at 10 years (p=0.091). CONCLUSION: The present study showed comparable good functional outcomes and survival at long-term between RHK and CCK arthroplasties. Both designs can be recommended for revision of total knee arthroplasty with symptomatic extension instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Negative Association of Subclinical Hypothyroidism on Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential influence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) on improvement in patient-reported outcome measures following primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A prospective, comparative cohort study between 92 SCH and 90 euthyroid patients was performed. Patients were followed up to 5 postoperative years. Patient-reported outcome measure was assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. The Knee Society Scores were used for functional evaluation, and 5-point Likert scale for patient satisfaction. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale was also used. RESULTS: All outcome scores significantly improved from preoperative to final follow-up in both groups (P = .001). There were no significant differences between groups in Knee Society Scores (P = .057) at the final follow-up, but Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were significantly lower in the SCH group (P = .015). Likewise, the patient satisfaction rate was significant lower in the SCH group (0.010). CONCLUSION: SCH patients have a slower functional recovery than euthyroid patients, and trended toward lower improvements in patient-reported scores. Depression was the most important negative factor. The findings of this study can provide the surgeon with an important information for better counseling the SCH patients.

Similar patient-reported outcomes for hybrid and cemented stem fixation for aseptic tibial revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of sequential prospective cohorts.

PURPOSE: The tibial stem fixation in an aseptic revision of total knee arthroplasty is poorly studied and controversial. The objective of this study was to prospectively compare clinical outcomes between hybrid and cemented fixation of the stem in aseptic tibial revision after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS: Two sequential prospective cohorts of patients who underwent aseptic tibial revision were compared after a minimum follow-up of five years: 31 had both tibial tray and stem cemented (cemented group), and 42 had a hybrid fixation with tibial tray cemented and stem cementless (hybrid group). Clinical assessment was performed by the Knee Society Scores and reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. Radiological assessment was also performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative data between groups. Postoperatively, no significant differences between groups in clinical scores or complication rate were found. Survival of the TKA revision at 5-year was 94% (95% CI 89-98%) in the cemented group, and 98% (95% CI 92-100%) in the hybrid group (ns). CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes and implant survival were comparable between hybrid and cemented tibial stem fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Similar outcomes and satisfaction after transtibial versus transportal femoral drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adult recreational athletes.

PURPOSE: Controversy continues regarding whether the transtibial (TT) and transportal (TP) methods for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction provide similar or different outcomes, and the evidence on patient satisfaction is very limited. The objective of this study was to compare functional outcomes and patient satisfaction in young adult recreational athletes who underwent arthroscopic hamstring ACL reconstruction using either the TT or the TP femoral tunnel drilling method. METHODS: A nonrandomized prospective study was designed to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic hamstring ACL reconstruction using TT or TP method. Functional outcome was assessed with the Lyshom score, and patient satisfaction with a 5-point Likert scale. Knee stability was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer. RESULTS: 42 patients in the TT group and 41 in TP group, with age ranged 18-40 years, were compared with a mean follow-up of 42 (range 24-60) months. There were no significant differences between groups in the Lysholm score (n.s.), sport return rate (n.s.) or patient satisfaction with the surgery (n.s.). Satisfaction was only significantly associated with the Lysholm score (OR 1.3; IC 95% 1.06-1.6; p = 0.012), but not with the return to sports (n.s.) or knee anterior laxity (n.s.). CONCLUSION: This study showed no statistical differences between the TT and the TP method in functional outcomes or patient satisfaction in young adult recreational athletes. In those patients, satisfaction with the surgery was not influenced by the return to sport activities. This study can guide surgeons in the decision-making for ACL reconstruction in recreational athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

A validated outcome categorization of the knee society score for total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To determine cutoff values for the Knee Society Scores (KSS) indicative of a categorical scale of medium-term outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five patients who underwent primary cruciate-retaining TKA with a patellar button for osteoarthritis at a single-centre were assessed prospectively by the KSS and short-form Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) simultaneously at the 3-year follow-up. A validated categorization of the WOMAC score was used as a standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the discriminative analysis accuracy of the, and the Youden index estimated the optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: For the KSS-knee score, the cutoff for an excellent outcome was 90.3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78), 76.6 (AUC 76.6, 95% CI 0.70-076) for good, 64.8 (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) for fair, and < 64.8 (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.73) for poor. For the KSS-function score, the cutoff values were 85.2 (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.69-0.75), 73.1 (AUC 0.72, 95% CI, 0.70-0.76), 55.7 (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.71-0.74), and < 55.7 (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.72), respectively. CONCLUSION: A KSS-knee score ≥ of 90 was considered an excellent outcome, 77 good, 65 fair, and < 65 poor. For the KSS-function, those values are 85, 73, 56 and < 56, respectively. The treatment outcome's judgement may be clearer for the surgeon concerning a particular patient when using cutoff values for the scoring system employed, such as those determined in the present study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

V-Y turndown flap augmentation for acute quadriceps rupture after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the quadriceps V-Y turndown augmentation for acute quadriceps tendon ruptures in the setting of TKA. METHODS: Prospective cohort of 22 patients with quadriceps rupture after TKA were compared with 44 matched patients underwent TKA without quadriceps rupture. Quadriceps ruptures were treated within three weeks after injury by suture augmented with Scuderi quadriceps V-Y turndown flap. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion. Patellar height was assessed by the Blackburne-Peel ratio. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 3.3 (range, 3-4) years. At the final follow-up, there were significant improvements in mean KSS scores in both groups (p = 0.001). In the quadriceps group, the mean flexion for all patients, but one with arthrodesis for periprosthetic infection, was 100.1° (range, 90-110°) and mean extensor lag was 7.1° (range, 0-20°). There were significant differences between groups in KSS scores (p = 0.001). Active flexion (p = 0.020) and extension (p = 0.001) were significantly better in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in WOMAC scores (p = 0.252) or patient satisfaction (p = 0.352). There were no quadriceps reruptures. One patient with periprosthetic infection was treated with arthrodesis. CONCLUSION: The quadriceps V-Y turndown is an effective and safe procedure for quadriceps ruptures in the setting of TKA. Although the functional outcomes were lower than in TKA patients with no quadriceps rupture, the quality of life and satisfaction were successful in the TKA patients with quadriceps rupture.

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Healed Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have analyzed the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, but not after healed fracture. The objective is to investigate the influence of a prior healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation on the outcomes of a subsequent THA for osteoarthritis. METHODS: This is a matched retrospective cohort study of THA between 43 patients who suffered a prior intertrochanteric fracture successfully managed with internal fixation and 43 patients without prior hip fracture. Mean age was 73.6 vs 74.2 years. A conventional cementless THA was used in both groups. Functional outcome was assessed by the Harris hip score (HHS) and reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. Radiological assessment was also performed. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.6 (range, 5-8) years. The mean operative time and blood transfusion rate were significantly higher in the fracture group (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the length of stay. HHS significantly improved in both groups. At final follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in nonfracture group (P = .008), but the rate of patients with excellent and good outcomes was similar (P = .616). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up was not different between groups (P = .058). Complication rate was similar between groups. There were no revisions, dislocations, or loose implants in the study group. CONCLUSION: Cementless THA provided successful functional outcomes and implant durability at medium term in patients treated for osteoarthritis following healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, comparable to those without prior fracture who underwent primary THA. Surgical complexity and complication rate were low.

Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of literature defining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Knee Society Scores (KSS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and no data on the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for KSS have been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine MCID and SCB for the KSS in patients with primary TKA. METHODS: The median age of patients was 71.6 (range 50-88) years, and 60.3% were females 507 patients with TKA were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the KSS before surgery and at second postoperative year. The MCID values of the KSS were estimated using anchor-based method, distribution-based method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with calculation of the area under curve (AUC). SCB was estimated using ROC. RESULTS: The MCID for KSS-knee score was 7.2 points by the anchor-based method, 7.2 by the distribution-based method, and using a ROC analysis the cutoff point was 8.9 points with an AUC of 0.75. For KSS-function score, the MCID values were 9.7, 6.3, and 10.3 (AUC 0.71), respectively. SCB values were 39.7 points (AUC 0.74) for the KSS-knee score, and 38.6 (AUC 0.76) for the KSS-function score. Logistic regression showed age and Charlson index to negatively affect the changes in KSS. CONCLUSION: Different methods for MCID calculation lead to different results. With the use of ROC curve analysis, patients with an improvement of at least 9 points for KSS-knee and 10 points for KSS-function scores experience a clinically important change, whereas those who have at least an improvement of 40 points for KSS-knee and 39 points for KSS-function scores experience a substantial clinical benefit. These findings can ensure clinical improvement from the patient's perspective and also aid in interpreting results from clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for Elderly Patients With Total Knee Replacement.

The purpose of this study was to validate the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for elderly patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR). The validated Spanish versions of the KOOS and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires were applied to 137 patients (mean age 72.3, SD 7.5 years). Test-retest data were collected with an intermediate period of 1-2 weeks. To evaluate the clinimetric properties of the KOOS, internal consistency (Cronbach's α), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), construct validity (Spearman's correlation), responsiveness (effect sizes [ES], and standardized response mean [SRM]), and floor and ceiling effects (<15%) were assessed. As result, Cronbach's coefficients of the KOOS subscales ranged from 0.78 to 0.93, and ICC from 0.76 to 0.91. Construct validity was supported by the confirmation of the three predefined hypotheses involving expected correlations between KOOS subscale and SF-36 physical health subscales. Spearman's correlations were strong between KOOS Pain and SF-36 Bodily Pain (r = 0.81), KOOS Pain and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r = 0.67), KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and SF-36 Bodily Pain (r = 0.69), KOOS ADL and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r = 0.74), and KOOS Sports/Recreation and SF-36 Physical Functioning (r = 0.76). Responsiveness at 1 year after TKR was large with the ES ranging from 0.81 to 2.12, and the SRM from 0.70 to 1.91. Floor and ceiling effects were low. In conclusion, the Spanish version of KOOS has successful psychometric characteristics and is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of patient-relevant outcomes in elderly patients with advanced OA who undergo TKR. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2157-2162, 2019.

Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative and Traumatic Tears in Middle-Aged Patients With No or Mild Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the benefit of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative lesions in middle-aged patients. PURPOSE: To compare satisfaction with APM between middle-aged patients with no or mild knee osteoarthritis (OA) and a degenerative meniscal tear and those with a traumatic tear. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A comparative prospective study at 5 years of middle-aged patients (45-60 years old) with no or mild OA undergoing APM for degenerative (n = 115) or traumatic (n = 143) tears was conducted. Patient satisfaction was measured by a 5-point Likert scale and functional outcomes by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors correlating with patient-reported satisfaction at 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were not different between groups. At the 5-year evaluation, the satisfaction rate in the traumatic and degenerative groups was 68.5% versus 71.3%, respectively (P = .365). Patient satisfaction was significantly associated with functional outcomes (r = 0.69; P = .024). In the degenerative group, 43 patients (37.4%) had OA progression to Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 2 or 3, but only 24 patients (20.8%) had a symptomatic knee at final follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis for patient dissatisfaction at 5-year follow-up showed the following significant independent factors: female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]; P = .018), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.7-4.9]; P = .035), lateral meniscal tears (OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .039), and OA progression to K-L grade ≥2 at final follow-up (OR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2-2.6]; P = .014). At the final evaluation, there were no significant differences between groups in pain scores (P = .648), WOMAC scores (P = .083), or KOOS-4 scores (P = .187). Likewise, there were no significant differences in the KOOS subscores for Pain (P = .144), Symptoms (P = .097), or Sports/Recreation (P = .150). Although the degenerative group had significantly higher subscores for Activities of Daily Living (P = .001) and Quality of Life (P = .004), the differences were considered not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: There were no meaningful differences in patient satisfaction or clinical outcomes between patients with traumatic and degenerative tears and no or mild OA. Predictors of dissatisfaction with APM were female sex, obesity, and lateral meniscal tears. Our findings suggested that APM was an effective medium-term option to relieve pain and recover function in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears, without obvious OA, and with failed prior physical therapy.

Negative impact of prior debridement on functional outcome of subsequent two-stage revision for early knee periprosthetic infection.

PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcome of two-stage revision (2SR) in patients without a prior debridement, antibiotics and implant retention with those patients who underwent 2SR after a failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for early periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Negative impact of prior failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention on the functional outcome of subsequent 2SR was hypothesized. METHODS: Case-control study of 49 patients initially treated with 2SR (group A) and 43 treated with 2SR after a prior failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (group B). Functional outcome was assessed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire. Range of motion (ROM) of the knee was also measured. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.1 (range 3-7) years. At final follow-up, KSS-knee (p = 0.001), KSS-function (p = 0.002), WOMAC-function (p = 0.022) and ROM (p = 0.002) were significantly better in the group A as compared to the group B. There was no significant difference between groups in the WOMAC-pain score (p = 0.597). In multivariate analysis, BMI < 30 (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.7-4.9, p = 0.026), non- Staphylococcus causative microorganism (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-5.9, p = 0.037), and 2SR procedure (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-5.2, p = 0.018) were significant predictors of successful functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A prior debridement, antibiotics and implant retention has been shown to have a negative impact on the functional outcome of a subsequent 2SR. These findings suggest that treatment with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for early periprosthetic infection should only be used in selected patients, and the first option in those patients with Staphylococcus organisms should be 2SR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Cementless, Fluted, Long-Stem Hemiarthroplasty for Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Hemiarthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a cementless, modular, fluted, long-stem hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture around hip hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study comparing 46 patients revised to hemiarthroplasty (HA group) and 31 revised to total hip arthroplasty (THA group). Functional outcome was evaluated by the Merle d'Aubigné score, and the Katz scale based on activities of daily living. Comorbidity was assessed by the Charlson index, and cognitive function by a mini-mental test score. Radiological evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: Mean postoperative follow-up was 3.3 (range, 2-4) years in the HA group and 3.9 (range, 2-5) in the THA group. The need for transfusion and hospital stay were significantly higher in the THA group. Postoperatively, both groups had a significant decrease in mean hip function (P = .001) although the mean Merle (P = .121) and Katz (P = .214) scores were similar at final follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences between groups in pain or loss of life independence. All fractures were united but one in the HA group. There were no dislocations in the HA group, and 3 in the THA group. CONCLUSION: The management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture around hemiarthroplasties with a long-stem revision cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty, supplemented with wire cerclages and cancellous allograft, was an effective option in terms of fracture healing and stability of the implant with a low rate of complications. Nevertheless, a significant functional impairment was also observed in either group.

Reasons for delaying surgery following hip fractures and its impact on one year mortality.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to identify the reasons for delayed surgery following hip fractures and analyze the impact of these reasons on 1-year mortality. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 1234 patients with mean age of 83.1 (range 65-92, SD 8.0) who underwent hip fracture surgery compared three subgroups: (1) surgery within two days from admission (609 patients); (2) delayed surgery for medical reasons (286); and (3) delayed surgery for organizational causes (339). Medical reason was defined as the need of medical optimization of the patient prior to surgery. Pre-operative assessment was performed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hodkinson mental status, Katz index for activities of daily living, and Short-Form (SF-12) questionnaire. Univariate analyses were used (chi-square and Fisher exact or Mantel-Haenszel tests for categorical data, and variance analysis, Student t test, or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data). Logistic regression models were used for influence of variables on complications and one year mortality. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in complications or one year mortality rates between patients with surgery within two days and those with delayed surgery for medical reasons. However, the patients with delayed surgery for organizational causes had significant higher rates of both complications and one year mortality compared to the other two groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that waiting time for hip fracture surgery more than two days was not associated with higher complication or mortality rate if waiting was to stabilize patients with active comorbidities at admission, compared to stable patients at admission with early surgery. Although early surgery within two days from admission is desirable for stable patients at admission, in patients with complex comorbidities, the surgery should be performed once they are optimized. However, the patients with delayed surgery for organizational reasons had a significant higher rate of post-operative complications and one year mortality compared to the other two groups.

Cruciate-Retaining vs Posterior-Stabilized Primary Total Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcome Comparison With a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues regarding whether the posterior cruciate ligament should be retained or removed during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure. The objective was to compare the clinical outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 10 years between patients who received contemporary cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized primary TKA. METHODS: Case-control study of 268 patients who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA vs 211 to posterior-stabilized design, with the same arthroplasty system, and a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinical assessment was performed by Knee Society scores, Western Ontario and MacMasters Universities and Short-Form 12 questionnaires, range of motion, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Successful outcomes were found for both designs. No significant differences in functional scores, range of motion, patient-related scores, or patient satisfaction. Between the 5-year and last postoperative follow-up, there were a significant decrease of all clinical scores in both groups. In addition, complication rate and implant survival were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: The superiority of one design over the other was not found. Both designs can be used expecting long-term successful outcomes and high survival. The choice of the design depended on the status of the posterior cruciate ligament and surgeon preference.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and the reported outcomes are controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess if prior ACL reconstruction had any impact on the outcome of subsequent TKA. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent TKA, including 37 with prior ACL reconstruction and 37 patients without ACL reconstruction. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected from a prospective arthroplasty database with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The mean age was 69.6 years, and 59.4% were men. The Knee Society scores, Short Form-12, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities questionnaires were used for functional evaluations. Visual analogue scale 0-10 was used for patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after TKA was 6.1 (range 5-7.3) years. Two patients in the ACL group developed knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia, while 1 patient in the control group suffered superficial wound infection. At last follow-up, no significant differences in functional or radiologic outcomes were found between both groups. The performance of TKA in ACL patients had increased technical difficulty and significantly longer time of surgery, but this had no influence on the outcomes. In the ACL group, 24 knees had technical difficulty in surgery. The main difficulty in most ACL patients was due to varus deformity and increased retraction of the medial soft structures which required progressive medial release. Other 2 knees had difficult knee exposure. One was an unexpected partial patellar tendon avulsion and the other required planned quadriceps snip. CONCLUSION: TKA was an effective procedure for patients with prior ACL reconstruction. The surgeon should be warned of the possible difficulties in the knee exposure and possible need of medial release to obtain an appropriate ligament balance. However, these additional procedures had no negative effect on the outcomes of TKA.

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Primary Arthroplasty Versus Secondary Arthroplasty After Failed Proximal Humeral Locking Plate Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between patients with failed proximal humeral locking plate (PHLP) fixation and those with acute fractures. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTING: University hospital, Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty consecutive patients with fracture sequelae because of failed PHLP fixation (mean age 73) were age and sex matched to 30 patients with acute fracture (mean age 75). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent RSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Constant, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Radiological assessments were also performed. RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up was 3.2 (range, 2-5) years. All functional scores significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative (P = 0.001) in the sequelae group. Pain was relieved in all but one patient, and all but 2 patients were satisfied with their RSA. However, the functional outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly worse in the sequelae group compared with acute group in terms of adjusted Constant (P = 0.013), UCLA (P = 0.020) and DASH (P = 0.048) scores, strength (P = 0.01), anterior forward (P = 0.021), and abduction (P = 0.007). Six patients (20%) in the sequelae group had complications including 2 intraoperative (diaphyseal false passages), 2 early dislocations, 1 acromial fracture, and 1 aseptic loosening of glenoid component. Four of these patients were revised resulting all in a successful outcome at the last follow-up. In the acute group there was one intraoperative humeral fracture with no impact on the final outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with failed PHLP fixation for fracture who were revised to RSA secondarily obtained marginally lower functional scores and higher complication rates compared with patients treated with primary RSA for fracture. However, patients who treated with secondary RSA had significant functional improvement and pain relief compared with their preoperative status, and most complications were manageable without a significant effect on final outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.