Better clinical outcomes and overall higher survival with hybrid versus cemented primary total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 15 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and survival at long-term between hybrid and cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A better clinical outcome and survival following a follow-up as long as 15 years with the use of hybrid fixation as compared with cemented fixation was hypothesized. METHODS: Case-control study of 126 patients with a mean age of 62.4 years who underwent hybrid TKA matched with 126 patients underwent cemented TKA. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Knee Society scores (KSS) and reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities questionnaire (WOMAC). Radiological assessment was made by the Knee Society method. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 15.7 (range 15-17) years. At the final follow-up, clinical scores were significantly better in the hybrid group, although the differences were not clinically relevant. Revisions for all reasons were performed in five knees in the hybrid group and 15 knees in the cemented group (p = 0.033). In the hybrid group, there was one aseptic femoral loosening and no aseptic tibial loosening. In the cemented group, the main reasons for aseptic revisions were polyethylene wear (six knees) and tibial loosening (four knees). Cemented fixation was a significant risk factor for aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-3.7%; p = 0.004). Survival at 15 years for aseptic reasons was 96.5% (95% CI 93.4-98.7%) in hybrid groups and 90.3% (95% CI 88.7-93.9%) in cemented group (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: After a minimum follow-up of 15 years, hybrid fixation of primary TKA for osteoarthritis provide significantly higher clinical benefits compared with cemented fixation, but the differences were not clinically relevant. Hybrid fixation provides longer overall survival, although the femoral component survival was similar between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prior unilateral total hip arthroplasty does not influence the outcome of ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of a prior well-functioning unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) on the functional outcome of a subsequent ipsilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of 92 patients older than 60 years underwent unilateral primary TKA after a prior ipsilateral THA (THA-TKA group) and 92 matched patients underwent only TKA (TKA group). Clinical assessments were performed using the Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Harris Hip Score (HSS), quality of life by the Reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaires. Radiological evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up after TKA was 7.2 (range 5-9) years. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline data at the TKA time. The mean gains in KSS were similar in both groups. At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences in WOMAC-pain or SF12-physical scores, but the WOMAC-function (p = 0.003) and SF12-mental (p = 0.018) scores were significantly better in the isolated TKA group. At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences in the radiological knee alignment or component positions. For aseptic reasons, the TKA survival at 8 years in the TKA group was 95.8 (95% CI 87.8-100%), and 96.6% (95% CI 91.8-100%) in the THA-TKA group (ns). CONCLUSION: A well-functioning unilateral THA does not influence on the functional outcome of a subsequent ipsilateral TKA. This finding can help clinicians when counseling patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Comparison Study of the Outcomes of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young vs Older Patients: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Prospective Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcome and prosthesis survival in patients aged between 20 and 40 years who received a cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 10 years compared to older patients. METHODS: Prospective matched comparative study was conducted between 94 young patients with mean age of 37.2 (range 22-40) years and 90 older patients with mean age of 64.7 (range 60-70) years treated with ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Harris Hip Score, reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster University (WOMAC), and Short-Form-12 (SF12) questionnaires. Radiological evaluation was also performed. The primary outcome was the THA survival rate. RESULTS: Mean follow-up of 13.6 (range, 10-15) years. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in Harris Hip Score (P = .356), WOMAC-pain (P = .461), SF12-physical (P = .305), or SF12-mental (P = .511), but younger group had significantly higher WOMAC-function score (P = .013). There were 7 revisions in the younger group and 4 in the older group (P = .197). The 14-year prosthesis survival for any reason was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.7-99.7) in the younger group and 98.3% (95% CI 95.1-100) in the older group (P = .189). For aseptic reason, the 14-year survival was 94.7% (95% CI 88.9-100) in the younger group and 98.3% (95% CI 95.1-100) in the older group (P = .332). CONCLUSION: At minimum follow-up of 10 years, THA with cementless stem and ceramic-on-ceramic bearing provides successful survival and functional outcomes in young patients between 20 and 40 years old.