Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Serv Res ; 52(5): 1749-1771, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714799

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy for consumers of two potential enhancements to the Medicare Plan Finder (MPF)-a simplified data display and a "quick links" home page designed to match the specific tasks that users seek to accomplish on the MPF. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Participants (N = 641) were seniors and adult caregivers of seniors who were recruited from a national online panel. Participants browsed a simulated version of the MPF, made a hypothetical plan choice, and reported on their experience. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions in a fully factorial design: 2 home pages (quick links, current MPF home page) × 2 data displays (simplified, current MPF display) × 2 plan types (stand-alone prescription drug plan [PDP], Medicare Advantage plan with prescription drug coverage [MA-PD]). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The quick links page resulted in more favorable perceptions of the MPF, improved users' understanding of the information, and increased the probability of choosing the objectively best plan. The simplified data display resulted in a more favorable evaluation of the website, better comprehension of the displayed information, and, among those choosing a PDP only, an increased probability of choosing the best plan. CONCLUSIONS: Design enhancements could markedly improve average website users' understanding, ability to use, and experience of using the MPF.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Internet , Medicare/organization & administration , User-Computer Interface , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Medicare Part C/organization & administration , Medicare Part D/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
3.
Med Care Res Rev ; 65(6): 655-73, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18596176

ABSTRACT

This article describes physicians' responses to patient questions and physicians' views about public reports on hospital quality. Interviews with 56 office-based physicians in seven states/regions used hypothetical scenarios of patients questioning referrals based on public reports of hospital quality. Responses were analyzed using an iterative coding process to develop categories and themes from data. Four themes describe physicians' responses to patients: (a) rely on existing physician-patient relationships, (b) acknowledge and consider patient perspectives, (c) take actions to follow up on patient concerns, and (d) provide patients' perspectives on quality reports. Three themes summarize responses to hospital quality reports: perceived lack of methodological rigor, content considerations in reports, and attitudes/experience regarding reports. Findings suggest that physicians take seriously patients' questions about hospital-quality reports and consider changing referral recommendations based on their concerns and/or preferences. Results underscore the importance of efforts by report developers and physician outreach/education to address physicians' methodological concerns.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hospitals/standards , Mandatory Reporting , Physicians/psychology , Quality of Health Care , Humans , United States
4.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 28(3): 61-76, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17645156

ABSTRACT

Senior hospital executives responding to a 2005 national telephone survey conducted for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) report that Hospital Compare and other public reports on hospital quality measures have helped to focus hospital leadership attention on quality matters. They also report increased investment in quality improvement (QI) projects and in people and systems to improve documentation of care. Additionally, more consideration is given to best practice guidelines and internal sharing of quality measure results among hospital staff Large, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) accredited hospitals appear to be responding to public reporting efforts more consistently than small, non-JCAHO accredited hospitals.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Hospital Administration/standards , Information Dissemination , Mandatory Reporting , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Care Surveys , Hospital Administrators/psychology , Humans , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Leadership , Organizational Innovation , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 28(3): 1-4, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25372493
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...