ABSTRACT
We aimed to describe utilization and indication(s) for long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and identify potential strategies to decrease CVC utilization. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective quality improvement initiative at a 30-bed PICU in a large, freestanding, academic children's hospital. We created an electronic report to identify patients with an indwelling CVC for 7 days and older (defined as long term). We discussed the ongoing need for each long-term CVC with PICU clinicians at weekly interdisciplinary structured "CVC stewardship rounds." We then made recommendations around expedited removal of CVCs. We conducted multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to categorize CVC indications, identify modifiable factors, and educate PICU clinicians. We hypothesized that CVC stewardship rounds would decrease long-term CVC utilization in our PICU. RESULTS: From October 2016 to September 2017, 607 long-term CVCs were eligible for the stewardship intervention. Compared to the preintervention period, we recorded a significant increase in peripherally inserted central catheters and a decrease in nontunneled CVCs (P < 0.001). Most patients had single- or double-lumen CVCs in both the preintervention and intervention periods (86% and 91%, respectively). The utilization of overall long-term CVC devices, and those with modifiable indications, decreased during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: A single-center QI intervention focused on PICU CVC stewardship was associated with a decrease in CVC utilization.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Design, implement, and evaluate a rounding checklist with deeply embedded, dynamic electronic health record integration. DESIGN: Before-after quality-improvement study. SETTING: Quaternary PICU in an academic, free-standing children's hospital. PATIENTS: All patients in the PICU during daily morning rounds. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of an updated dynamic checklist (eSIMPLER) providing clinical decision support prompts with display of relevant data automatically pulled from the electronic health record. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prior daily rounding checklist, eSIMPLE, was implemented for 49,709 patient-days (7,779 patients) between October 30, 2011, and October 7, 2018. eSIMPLER was implemented for 5,306 patient-days (971 patients) over 6 months. Checklist completion rates were similar (eSIMPLE: 95% [95% CI, 88-98%] vs eSIMPLER: 98% [95% CI, 92-100%] of patient-days; p = 0.40). eSIMPLER required less time per patient (28 ± 1 vs 47 ± 24 s; p < 0.001). Users reported improved satisfaction with eSIMPLER (p = 0.009). Several checklist-driven process measures-discordance between electronic health record orders for stress ulcer prophylaxis and user-recorded indication for stress ulcer prophylaxis, rate of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis prescribing, and recognition of reduced renal function-improved during the eSIMPLER phase. CONCLUSIONS: eSIMPLER, a dynamic, electronic health record-informed checklist, required less time to complete and improved certain care processes compared with a prior, static checklist with limited electronic health record data. By focusing on the "Five Rights" of clinical decision support, we created a well-accepted clinical decision support tool that was integrated efficiently into daily rounds. Generalizability of eSIMPLER's effectiveness and its impact on patient outcomes need to be examined.
