Nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most complex ablation procedures. Both patients and operators are exposed to scattered radiation. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intracardiac echo (ICE)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) without fluoroscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 481 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency PVI with the CARTO 3 system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). ICE-guided PVI without fluoroscopy and without CT/MRI integration (Nonfluoro group) was performed for 245 patients, and conventional fluoroscopy-guided PVI (Fluoro group) was performed for 236 patients. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedure duration, fluoroscopy duration, and acute PVI rate. RESULTS: Mean procedure times between groups were similar (108.8 ± 18.2 minutes in the Non-fluoro group vs 113.6 ± 26.8 minutes in the Fluoro group; P  =  not significant [NS]). Acute PVI was achieved in all patients, with mean radiofrequency application times of 43.4 ± 7.5 and 44.4 ± 10.7 minutes for the Nonfluoro and Fluoro groups, respectively (P  =  NS). The incidence of cardiac tamponade was 1.2% (3/245 patients) in the Nonfluoro group and 0.8% (2/236 patients) in the Fluoro group (P  =  NS). During 15.2 ± 4.1 months of follow-up, after a single procedure, AF recurrence was documented in 65 of 245 (26.5%) patients and 61 of 236 (25.8%) patients in the Nonfluoro and Fluoro groups, respectively (P  =  NS). CONCLUSIONS: Nonfluoroscopic ICE-guided catheter ablation of AF without prior cardiac image integration or angiography is feasible and safe. PVI without fluoroscopy did not affect procedure duration or long-term efficacy.

Mapping of ventricular arrhythmias using a novel noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the use of a novel noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system (NEEES) for mapping of ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Eight patients (2 females, mean age 50±17 years) with ischemic (n=3) and nonischemic (n=5) cardiomyopathy and inducible ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiology study were enrolled. Noninvasive mapping of ventricular arrhythmias was performed using the NEEES based on body-surface electrocardiograms and computed tomography imaging data. Arrhythmia patterns were analyzed using noninvasive phase mapping. RESULTS: Macro-reentrant VT circuits were observed in 3 ischemic and 1 nonischemic cardiomyopathy patient, respectively. In the remaining 4 patients, phase mapping revealed relatively stable rotor activity and multiple wavelets. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive cardiac mapping was able to visualize the macro-reentrant circuits in patients with scar-related VT. In patients without myocardial scar only polymorphic VT or VF was inducible, and rotor activity and multiple wavelets were observed.