A Novel Classification of the Inframammary Fold for Use in Primary Breast Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Previous aesthetic breast surgery algorithms have not addressed the importance of evaluating the native inframammary fold before primary breast augmentation. In the authors' experience, assessment of native inframammary fold anatomy significantly impacts surgical planning and technique. Failure to adequately evaluate and manage the inframammary fold leads to many of the common problems of the lower pole, including double-bubble deformity. METHODS: The authors assessed the inframammary fold preoperatively in 2192 consecutive patients undergoing primary breast augmentation between June of 2014 and December of 2018. A novel classification of inframammary fold morphology was devised based on review of standardized preoperative photographs. Outcome assessment was performed postoperatively at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: The authors identified four clear inframammary fold subtypes based on their clinical appearance, ranging from the nonexistent type F0 to the well-formed and fixed type F3. The key outcome measure examined was the presence of double-bubble deformity postoperatively. There were three total cases of double-bubble deformity identified in our cohort (<1 percent of patients). All cases of double-bubble deformity occurred in patients with a type 3 fold. CONCLUSIONS: The inframammary fold defines the inferior boundary of the lower pole of the breast and is a critical landmark to the aesthetic breast surgeon. The authors describe a unique and simple inframammary fold classification system that assists in selection of the appropriate approach to the inframammary fold in addition to implant dimensional planning. The authors have found that this system-in particular, the identification of the type F3 inframammary fold-has minimized the risk of inframammary fold-associated complications in over 2000 cases. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations. RESULTS: Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics.

A split forehead flap for the treatment of resistant bilateral upper and lower eyelid ectropion postburn injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this surgical procedure was to definitively correct severe recurrent upper and lower bilateral eyelid ectropion after 2 attempts with full-thickness skin grafts. It was necessary to repair all 4 eyelids with forehead skin. Middle lamella support was required. METHODS: Bilateral median forehead flaps, which were well vascularized by the supratrochlear vessels, were chosen for this procedure to utilize the readily available forehead tissue. The median forehead flap can be easily positioned to cover the entire eyelid. Furthermore, the flap could be split in half, without the risk of vascular compromise. Middle lamella support was provided with a cartilage graft from the nasal septum. RESULTS: At 4 months, the patient no longer suffered from exposure keratopathy and both forehead flaps had healed well. At 12 months, the functional and cosmetic outcomes of this procedure were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This method of surgery can be effective in the young, in whom the Mustarde cheek advancement fails, or when there is little available unburnt tissue. It can be used as an alternative to a forehead flap when both upper and lower eyelids are damaged bilaterally. The split forehead flap definitively corrected the ectropion in this case.

Biliary tract injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a single unit.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into Australia in early 1990. Its rapid increase in acceptance was, however, tempered by reports of an increased incidence of bile duct injury. The aim of this study was to report on the incidence of biliary tract injuries in a single unit, comment on the way they were managed and look at strategies to prevent them. METHODS: A retrospective audit was conducted on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between January 1992 and March 2001. The data was collated from patient medical record files and yielded a total of 1216 procedures. RESULTS: There were 899 women (74%) and 317 men (26%), with an age range of 13-92 years. Most of the procedures were performed on an elective (94%) rather than emergent basis (6%). There was one bile duct injury (0.09%) and seven bile leaks (0.63%). The single injury involved common bile duct obstruction by a misplaced clip and was successfully managed by chol-angio-enteric bypass. Of the seven bile leaks, three were from the cystic duct stump, two from the gallbladder bed, and two were unidentified, settling conservatively. Of the five patients actively treated, two underwent therapeutic laparoscopy, two proceeded to laparotomy, and one was managed successfully by endoscopic stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Single-centre studies such as this are important in ensuring that standards of surgery are maintained in a community setting.