Impact of Weight Management on Obesity-Driven Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer Progression.

PURPOSE: Excess body and visceral fat increase the risk of death from prostate cancer (PCa). This phase II study aimed to test whether weight reduction by > 5% total body weight counteracts obesity-driven PCa biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty men scheduled for prostatectomy were randomized into intervention (n = 20) or control (n = 20) arms. Intervention participants followed a weight management program for 4 to 16 weeks before and 6 months after surgery. Control participants received standardized educational materials. All participants attended visits at baseline, 1 week before surgery, and 6 months after surgery. Circulating immune cells, cytokines, and chemokines were evaluated. Weight loss, body composition/distribution, quality of life, and nutrition literacy were assessed. Prostate tissue samples obtained from biopsy and surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: From baseline to surgery (mean = 5 weeks), the intervention group achieved 5.5% of weight loss (95% CI, 4%-7%). Compared to the control, the intervention also reduced insulin, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, leptin, leptin:adiponectin ratio, and visceral adipose tissue. The intervention group had reduced c-peptide, plasminogen-activator-inhibitor-1, and T cell count from baseline to surgery. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells were not statistically different by group. Intervention group anthropometrics improved, including visceral and overall fat loss. No prostate tissue markers changed significantly. Quality of life measures of general and emotional health improved in the intervention group. The intervention group maintained or kept losing to a net loss of 11% initial body weight (95% CI, 8%-14%) at the study end. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated improvements in body composition, PCa biomarkers, and quality of life with a weight management intervention.

Expressions of glucose transporter genes are diversely attenuated and significantly associated with prostate cancer progression.

Prostate cancer is a health-threaten disease in men worldwide, however, lacking is the reliable biomarkers for patient management. Aberrant metabolic events including glucose metabolism are involved in prostate cancer progression. To examine the involvement of glucose metabolic pathways in prostate cancer, we analyzed the expression profiles of glucose transporter family genes using multiple RNA-seq datasets. Our results showed that three SLC2A family genes (SLC2A4/5/9) were significantly downregulated in primary prostate cancers compared to their benign compartments. These down-regulated expressions were inversely correlated with their gene promoter methylation and genome abnormalities. Among these three SLC2A genes, only SLC2A4 showed a significantly reverse correlation with all clinicopathological parameters, including TNM stage, disease relapse, Gleason score, disease-specific survival, and progression-free interval. In addition, the expression levels of these three genes were strongly correlated with anti-cancer immune cell filtration in primary prostate cancers. In a group of patients with early-onset prostate cancers, SLC2A4 also showed a strong negative correlation with multiple clinicopathological parameters, such as tumor mutation burden, biochemical relapse, pre-surgical PSA levels, and Gleason score but a positive correlation with progression-free interval after surgery. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC), SLC2A9 gene expression but not SLC2A4 or SLC2A5 genes showed a significant correlation with androgen receptor (AR) activity score and neuroendocrinal (NE) activity score. Meanwhile, SLC2A2/9/13 expression was significantly elevated in CRPC tumors with neuroendocrinal features compared to those without NE features. On the other hand, SLC2A10 and SlC2A12 gene expression were significantly reduced in NEPC tumors compared to CRPC tumors. Consistently, SLC2A10/12 expression levels were significantly reduced in castrated animals carrying the LuCaP35 xenograft models. Survival outcome analysis revealed that SLC2A4 expression in primary tumors is a favorable prognostic factor and SLC2A6 is a worse prognostic factor for disease-specific survival and progression-free survival in prostate cancer patients. In conclusion, our results suggest that SLC2A4/6 expressions are strong prognostic factors for prostate cancer progression and survival. The significance of SLC2A2/9/13 over-expression during NEPC progression needs more investigation.

Aberrant expression of multiple glycolytic enzyme genes is significantly associated with disease progression and survival outcomes in prostate cancers.

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer death after lung cancer in men. Recent studies showed that aberrant metabolic pathways are involved in prostate cancer development and progression. In this study, we performed a systemic analysis of glycolytic enzyme gene expression using the TCGA-PRAD RNAseq dataset. Our analysis revealed that among 25 genes, only four genes (HK2/GPI/PFKL/PGAM5) were significantly upregulated while nine genes (HK1/GCK/PFKM/PFKP/ALDOC/PGK1/PGAM1/ENO2/PKM) were downregulated in primary prostate cancer tissues compared to benign compartments. Among these 13 altered genes, four genes (ENO2/ALDOC/GPI/GCK) exhibited strong diagnostic potential in distinguishing malignant and benign tissues. Meanwhile, GPI expression exerted as a prognostic factor of progression-free and disease-specific survival. PFKL and PGAM5 gene expressions were associated with AR signaling scores in castration-resistant patients, and AR-targeted therapy suppressed their expression. In LuCap35 xenograft tumors, PFKL and PGAM5 expression was significantly reduced after animal castration, confirming the AR dependency. Conversely, GCK/PKLR genes were significantly associated with neuroendocrinal progression, representing two novel neuroendocrinal biomarkers for prostate cancer. In conclusion, our results suggest that GPI expression is a strong prognostic factor for prostate cancer progression and survival while GCK/PKLR are two novel biomarkers of prostate cancer progression to neuroendocrinal status.

Evaluating PubMed-Indexed Publications of Applicants Successfully Matching into the Top 50 Urology Residency Programs in the 2021-2023 Cycles.

Background and objective Urology residency match occurs through the American Urological Association (AUA), and hence information about the success of applicants in finding a match is not readily available. The average number of publications a successful urology applicant has when applying for residency is unknown. In light of this, we conducted this study to examine the number of PubMed-indexed research projects involving US senior medical students who successfully matched into the top 50 urology residency programs in the 2021, 2022, and 2023 match cycles. We also assessed these applicants based on their medical schools and gender. Methods Doximity Residency Navigator was used to generate the top 50 residency programs as sorted by reputation. Newly matched residents were found using program Twitter accounts and residency program websites. PubMed was queried for peer-reviewed publications of incoming interns. Results The average number of publications across all incoming interns in the three years was 3.65. The average number of urology-specific publications was 1.86 and that of first-author urology publications was 1.11. The median number of total publications for matched applicants was 2, and applicants with a total of five publications were in the 75th percentile for research productivity. Conclusion A successful applicant had two PubMed-indexed urology papers on average and also had a urology-specific first-author paper in the cycles we surveyed. There has been an increase in publications per applicant when comparing the results to previous application cycles, which can be attributed to post-pandemic changes.

The Impact of the Virtual Interview on Candidate Experience and Outcomes: Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Interns Who Participated in the 2020-2021 Urology Match.

OBJECTIVE: To examine retrospective experiences with the virtual interview (VI) process among postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) urology residents who participated in the 2020-2021 American Urologic Association (AUA) Match cycle. METHODS: A 27-question survey created by a Society of Academic Urologists Taskforce on VI was distributed to PGY1 residents from 105 institutions between February 1, 2022 and March 7, 2022. The survey asked respondents to reflect on the VI process, cost concerns, and how experiences at their current program aligned with prior VI representation. RESULTS: A total of 116 PGY-1 residents completed the survey. The majority felt the VI represented the following domains well: (1) institution/program culture and strengths (74%), (2) representation of all faculty/disciplines (74%), (3) resident quality of life (62%), (4) personal fit (66%), (5) quality of surgical training and volume (63%), and (6) opportunities to meet residents (60%). Approximately 71% of respondents did not match at their home program or a program they visited in-person. Within this cohort, 13% agreed important aspects of their current program were not translated virtually, and they would not have prioritized the program had they been able to visit in-person. In total, 61% ranked programs they ordinarily might not have listed during an in-person interview season. Overall, 25% deemed financial costs a "very important" consideration during the VI process. CONCLUSION: The majority of PGY1 urology residents reported key components of their current program translated well from the VI process. This platform offers a method of overcoming conventional geographic and financial barriers associated with the in-person interview process.

Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: The traditional residency selection process was altered dramatically by the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. For the 2020-2021 application cycle in-person interviews were transitioned to the virtual format. What was thought to be a temporary transition has now become the new standard with continued endorsement from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the Society of Academic Urologists (SAU) for virtual interviews (VI). We sought to assess the perceived efficacy and satisfaction of the VI format from the urology residency program director's (PDs) perspective. DESIGN: A designated SAU Taskforce on "Optimizing the Applicant Experience in the Virtual Interview Era" developed and refined a survey composed of 69 questions on VI and was distributed to all urology program directors (PD) of member institutions of the SAU. The survey focused on candidate selection, faculty preparation, and interview day logistics. PDs were also asked to reflect on the impact of VI on their match results, recruitment of underrepresented minorities and female gender, and what their preference would be for future applications cycles. PARTICIPANTS: Urology residency PDs (84.7% response rate) between January 13, 2022 - February 10, 2022 were included in the study. RESULTS: Most programs interviewed a total of 36 to 50 applicants (80%), with an average of 10 to 20 applicants per interview day. The top 3 ranked criteria for interview selection reported by urology PDs surveyed included letters of recommendation, clerkship grades, and USMLE Step 1 score. The most common areas of formal training for faculty interviewers were diversity, equity and inclusion (55%), implicit bias (66%), and review of the SAU guidelines on illegal questions (83%). Over half (61.4%) of PDs believed that they were able to accurately represent their training program through the virtual platform, while 51% felt that VI did not afford similar assessments of applicant as in-person interviews. Two-thirds of PDs believed the VI platform improve access for all applicants to attend interviews. Focusing on the impact of the VI platform for recruitment of underrepresented minorities (URM) and female gender applicants, 15% and 24% reported improved visibility respectively for their program, and 24% and 11% reported increased ability to interview URM and female gender applicants respectively. Overall, in-person interviews were reported to be preferred by 42%, and 51% of PDs desired VIs to be included in future years. CONCLUSIONS: PDs opinion and role of the VIs into the future is variable. Despite uniform agreement of cost savings and belief that VI platform improves access for all, only half of PDs expressed interest of the VI format being continued in some form. PDs note limitation of VI in the ability to comprehensively assess applicants as well as the in-person format. Many programs have begun to incorporate vital training in the areas of diversity equity and inclusion bias, and illegal questions. There is a role for continued development and research on ways to optimize virtual interviews.

Preference Signaling Pilot in the Urology Match: Outcomes and Perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions and outcomes of the A preference signaling (PS) pilot implemented by the Society of Academic Urology in the 2021-2022 Urology Match cycle. METHODS: Five non-weighted signals were provided to each applicant, and signals were delivered to programs by the American Urological Association to provide an applicant-centered formal and equitable process to express genuine interest in residency programs. Applicant and program perception and behavior was assessed through surveys. Signal distribution, mean, range, and interview offer rates for overall, signaled, and non-signaled programs were calculated. RESULTS: In the 2021-2022 Urology Match cycle, 566 applicants completed signaling; 2829 total signals were sent to programs with 97% applicant and 100% program participation. Each program received a mean number of 19 signals (range of 1-62), and 25% of programs received 49% of all signals. The overall interview-offer rate for the cohort was 12.5% (6019 interviews held/47,989 applications received); the signaled interview rate was 51% (1443/2829), and the non-signaled interview rate was 10% (4576/45,160) with an approximate 4-fold increase in rate of interview for signaled programs compared to non-signaled programs. There was moderate to high levels of satisfaction from applicants and programs on the overall process. 48% of programs incorporated PS into initial application review. CONCLUSION: Preference signaling was demonstrated to be feasible and successful in providing a novel applicant-directed, formal, equitable, and credible structured process for applicants to express genuine interest in programs. Additionally, programs were able to incorporate PS into their interview selection and recruitment process.

Preoperative Optimization of Promotility in Robotic Prostatectomy and Minimally Invasive Kidney Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Patients are routinely discharged postoperative day 1 following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for prostate cancer and kidney cancer. Delays in discharge are often related to gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain and vomiting; however, the role of baseline constipation in these symptoms and resultant delays in discharge is unclear. We conducted a prospective observational study to describe the incidence of baseline constipation among patients undergoing MIS prostate and kidney surgery, and its relationship to length of stay (LOS). METHODS: Consenting adult patients undergoing MIS procedures for kidney and prostate cancer completed constipation symptom questionnaires perioperatively. Clinicopathological data were collected prospectively. Delay in discharge, defined as LOS >2 days, was the primary outcome. Patients were stratified by the primary outcome and preoperative Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) scores were compared. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients enrolled, of whom 29 underwent radical nephrectomy, 34 underwent robotic partial nephrectomy and 34 underwent robotic prostatectomy. Constipation symptoms were reported in 67/97 patients (69%). A total of 17/97 patients (18%) had a delay in discharge. Patients who discharged on time had a median PAC-SYM score of 2 (IQR 2-9) compared to 4 (IQR 0-7.5) for those with a delay (p=0.021). Patients who had a delay with gastrointestinal symptoms had a median PAC-SYM score of 5 (IQR 1.5-11.5, p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Seven out of 10 patients undergoing routine MIS procedures report constipation symptoms, which may represent a target for preoperative interventions to reduce LOS after surgery.

Cost Implications of Routine Preoperative Blood Typing and Crossmatching Prior to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment of small renal masses has shifted from open to minimally invasive approaches. Preoperative blood typing and product orders often mirror the practices of the open era. We aim to define the rate of transfusion after robot-assisted partial laparoscopic nephrectomy (RAPN) at an academic medical center and the costs associated with current practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of an institutional database was utilized to identify patients who underwent RAPN and transfusion of blood products. Patient, tumor and operative variables were identified. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2021, 804 patients underwent RAPN, with 9 (1.1%) patients requiring a transfusion. Comparison of the transfused group with nontransfused patients yielded a significant difference in mean operative blood loss (527.8 ml vs 162.5 ml, p <0.0001), R.E.N.A.L. (for radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry score (7.1 vs 5.9, p <0.05), hemoglobin (11.3 gm/dl vs 13.9 gm/dl, p <0.05) and hematocrit (34.2% vs 41.4%, p <0.05). The variables associated with transfusion on univariate analysis were examined for predictive capacity using logistic regression. Operative blood loss (p <0.05), nephrometry score (p=0.05), hemoglobin (p <0.05) and hematocrit (p <0.05) remained associated with a transfusion. The hospital charge for blood typing and crossmatching was $1,320 USD per patient. CONCLUSIONS: With the maturity of RAPN techniques and outcomes, the extent of preoperative testing related to blood products should evolve to better reflect current procedural risks. Prioritizing testing resources for patients at increased complication risk can be based on predictive factors.

Patient Preferences Regarding Chaperone Use for Sensitive Examinations.

INTRODUCTION: Chaperones are often employed during sensitive patient encounters and have been assumed to be mutually beneficial to the patient and provider. The aim of this study is to characterize patient preferences regarding the use of chaperones. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board Approval, a questionnaire designed to evaluate preferences regarding chaperone use from a patient perspective was distributed electronically through the ResearchMatch platform as well as to patients in an outpatient urology clinic. Descriptive statistics were used to assess responder demographics, clinical experiences and preferences. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with a preference for having a chaperone present during health care visits. RESULTS: A total of 913 individuals completed the survey. Over half (52.9%) reported they would not want a chaperone for any part of a health care visit. Although rectal and genital/pelvic examinations were considered sensitive by 76.3% and 85% of responders, respectively, only 25.4% and 15.7% preferred a chaperone during these encounters. Reasons for not wanting a chaperone included trust in the provider (80%) and comfort with examinations (70.4%). Male responders were less likely to report a preference for a chaperone (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19-0.39) or consider provider gender as a significant factor in preferring a chaperone (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Preference regarding the use of a chaperone is primarily influenced by gender of both the patient and the provider. For sensitive examinations commonly performed in the field of urology, most individuals would not prefer a chaperone be present.

Intensive preoperative ostomy education for the radical cystectomy patient.

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit formation usually receive training on the use of their stoma during their initial hospitalization - while actively recovering from surgery - often with little follow-up or reinforcement. Many of these patients are not equipped to deal with these significant body changes, which can lead to additional clinic visits, stoma-related complications, and decreased patient satisfaction/health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In an effort to improve patient education, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a preoperative comprehensive stoma education session termed the "stoma bootcamp" for patients scheduled for a radical cystectomy and ileal conduit (RCIC). We tracked patient related outcomes to determine its impact. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal, quality-improvement feasibility study at the University of Kansas Health System. All patients who were scheduled to undergo a RCIC for bladder cancer were offered enrollment into the study at their preoperative clinic visit. The "stoma boot camp" consisted of a 3-hour group session within 2 weeks of the surgery date. Patients were given a short presentation by residents and advanced practice providers regarding the operation, recovery, and expectations for their post-operative care. Ostomy nurses then demonstrated basic urostomy care - pouching, sizing, emptying - along with trouble-shooting tips for common ostomy problems. Measurements of HRQOL questionnaires were completed at the initial visit, after "boot camp," and at defined time points after surgery for 12 weeks. This included using an ostomy adjustment score. Length of stay, unplanned stoma-related interventions, and re-admissions within 30 days were also tracked. RESULTS: In this initial pilot program, 51 patients participated in the stoma bootcamp. The patients had an average ostomy adjustment score (OAS) of 150.4 (95% CI 142.0, 158.8) at discharge from the hospital, and these high OAS levels persisted throughout the 12 weeks of follow-up data without any significant decline. Short-form 36 (SF-36) scores demonstrated numerical improvements in each individual category at the 6-week mark above baseline. These improvements persisted at the 12-week mark. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we were able to establish the feasibility of implementing a preoperative comprehensive stoma education session for patients scheduled for a RCIC. Additionally, we were able to document favorable HRQOL data and improved ostomy adjustment scores surrounding the education session.

First Characterization of Resident Clinical Experience at American Urological Training Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To provide the first nationwide characterization of the clinical learning environment in American urological training programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors (PD) at American Urological Association-accredited urological training programs after requesting their email address from each program coordinator. The 21-question survey was designed to ascertain key components of each training environment: demographics, training model, clinic structure, and resident perception. RESULTS: The program coordinator of 131 American Urological Association-accredited training programs received an email for participation, yielding the PD email for 113 programs. 60/113 (53%) PDs responded to the survey. Residents participated in clinic at the following types of hospitals: Children's 51 (85%), County/Indigent 23 (38%), Private 29 (48%), University 56 (93%), Veterans Administration 38 (63%). Prevalence of clinical training models is presented in table 1. On average, PDs estimated their residents spend 2.6 half days in clinic each week (1-6). Thirteen programs (22%) reported a "clinic only" rotation, varying from 1 to 6 months total. PDs reported time constraint and schedule to be the biggest barrier to teaching in clinic and 40% felt residents see clinic as a valuable part of their training while 30% felt residents see clinic as a necessary exercise but with limitations to learning opportunities. CONCLUSION: We present the first characterization of resident participation in the clinical learning environment. Structure is highly variable and directed effort is necessary to move toward improved assessment and monitoring of resident competency in clinic.

When virtual becomes reality: short term impressions of a two-week virtual urology sub-internship program.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical student education and posed a unique challenge for educators, especially for surgical clerkships. In response to COVID-19 rotation restrictions, we implemented a virtual urologic surgery sub-internship program and evaluated medical student impressions of the experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-week urology curriculum was created with content delivered by interactive videoconferencing. The curriculum included synchronous and individual learning with live patient clinical experiences in the outpatient clinic and operating room, lectures, departmental conferences, a suture lab, self-reflective writing exercises, and an oral presentation. Student impressions were assessed with an exit survey. Descriptive statistics were utilized to evaluate the 5-point Likert scale responses. RESULTS: A total of 40 students applied, and 18 were selected for 1 of 5 two-week rotation blocks. All students successfully passed the rotation. Of the 18 students who participated, 16 (88.9%) completed the exit survey. The overall experience was rated as "strongly positive" by 14 of 16 (87.5%) students. The learning experience was rated as 4.75 (0.45) (average (SD)). The rotation positively impacted our virtual students' plan to apply to this residency program (mean 4.81 (0.54)). All students reported they would recommend this rotation to a fellow student, and feedback regarding the self-reflection activities was positive. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully implemented a two-week virtual urology sub-internship rotation with a wide variety of clinical and educational experiences. The rotation was well received by our medical students. This is a unique experience in urology that can easily be implemented by other surgical sub-specialty programs in the future.

A qualitative evaluation of a nurse-led pre-operative stoma education program for bladder cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy remains the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Postoperative ostomy education is common, but patients struggle to maintain self-management practices. A preoperative ostomy education program was developed to meet this need, and we conducted a qualitative study with participating patient-caregiver dyads to evaluate the educational and psychosocial impacts of the program and examine alignment with program objectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted utilizing a thematic analysis approach. Sixteen patients, eighteen caregivers, and three program educators completed semi-structured interviews from 3 to 18 months post the program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thirteen end-of-course surveys from the initial educational program cohort were transcribed, coded, analyzed; this data was triangulated with patient, caregiver, and educator interviews. RESULTS: Analysis uncovered three themes: (1) Patient and caregiver motivation to attend the program, (2) attitudes toward this life-changing event, and (3) education. For theme 1, patients and caregivers cited lack of knowledge, fear, and concern about ostomy surgery and care as motivation. For theme 2, there were a variety of attitudes toward the ostomy, ranging from avoidance to acceptance, and a similar breadth of attitudes toward caregiving, with some patients and caregivers describing ongoing dependence and other patients seeking complete independence. For theme 3, the interactive curriculum was determined to be effective, and the patient advocate was cited as the most memorable program component. CONCLUSIONS: A formal preoperative ostomy education program employing an interactive educational approach and featuring a patient advocate can prepare bladder cancer patients and caregivers for ostomy self-management and post-ostomy life.

Feasibility of a Weight Management Program Tailored for Overweight Men with Localized Prostate Cancer - A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Overweight men with prostate cancer are more likely to suffer from recurrence and death following prostatectomy compared with healthy weight men. This study tested the feasibility of delivering a comprehensive program to foster weight loss before and weight maintenance after surgery in overweight men with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty overweight men scheduled for prostatectomy elected either the intervention (n = 15) or the nonintervention (n = 5). Anthropometrics, biomarkers, diet quality, nutrition literacy, quality of life, and long-term follow-up were assessed in both groups. RESULTS: The intervention led to 5.55 kg of weight loss including 3.88 kg of fat loss from baseline to surgery (mean = 8.3 weeks). The intervention significantly increased fiber, protein, fruit, nut, and vegetable intake; and decreased trans fats intake during weight loss. The intervention significantly reduced insulin, C-peptide, systolic blood pressure, leptin:adiponectin ratio, and visceral adiposity compared to the nonintervention. Post-surgically, weight loss was maintained. Changes in lipid profiles, nutrition literacy, and follow-up were not statistically significant in either group. CONCLUSION: Significant weight loss (≥5%) is feasible with a coaching intervention in overweight men preparing for prostatectomy and is associated with favorable cardiometabolic effects. This study is registered under NCT02252484 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Effect of COVID-19 on Urology Residency Training: A Nationwide Survey of Program Directors by the Society of Academic Urologists.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has profoundly impacted residency training and education. To date, there has not been any broad assessment of urological surgery residency changes and concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Society of Academic Urologists distributed a questionnaire to urology residency program directors on March 30, 2020 exploring residency program changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics are presented. A qualitative analysis of free response questions was undertaken. A post hoc analysis of differences related to local COVID-19 incidence is described. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 144 residency programs with 65 responses for a 45% response rate. Reserve staffing had started in 80% of programs. Patient contact time had decreased significantly from 4.7 to 2.1 days per week (p <0.001). Redeployment was reported by 26% of programs. Sixty percent of programs reported concern that residents will not meet case minimums due to COVID-19. Wellness activities centered on increased communication. All programs had begun to use videoconferencing and the majority planned to continue. Programs in states with a higher incidence of COVID-19 were more likely to report resident redeployment (48% vs 11%, p=0.002) and exposure to COVID-19 positive patients (70% vs 40%, p=0.03), and were less likely to report concerns regarding exposure (78% vs 97%, p=0.02) and personal protective equipment availability (62% vs 89%, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As of April 1, 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic had resulted in significant changes in urology residency programs. These findings inform a rapidly changing landscape and aid in the development of best practices.

The Limited Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance after Radical and Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: We determined the usefulness of ultrasound compared to cross-sectional imaging in the detection of intra-abdominal recurrences after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 800 patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy between 2008 and 2015. Patients had at minimum 1 year of followup at our institution, at least 1 ultrasound during surveillance and no metastases at time of surgery. Our primary outcome was the rate of diagnosis of abdominal recurrence based on modality of surveillance. RESULTS: Median followup for the entire cohort was 37.5 months (range 12 to 166). Overall 396 and 404 patients underwent radical and partial nephrectomy, respectively, for localized renal cell carcinoma. There were 224 (57%) and 234 (58%) patients in the radical and partial nephrectomy cohorts, respectively, who had 2 or more ultrasounds performed during surveillance. In the radical and partial nephrectomy cohorts a total of 149 (19%) abdominal recurrences were detected, with only 8 (19%) initially detected by ultrasound. On the other hand, 15 (10%) recurrences were missed by a prior negative ultrasound. Furthermore, there were 8 false-positive ultrasound studies that cross-sectional imaging later ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: The low yield of ultrasound in the detection of abdominal recurrences after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma raises questions as to its usefulness in routine surveillance.

Eighteen-Year Review of Resident Performance on the American Urological Association In-Service Examination.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze national performance trends of urology residents on the American Urological Association In-Service Examination (ISE) over the last 18 years. METHODS: Trends in the national averages on the in-service examination for each year of residency training were collected and analyzed between the years 2000 and 2017. Mean and standard error were calculated for examination performance for each year of residency. Subject-specific performance was also determined for each given year of residency. Regression analysis was used to model trends in performance as a function of residency year. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in examination performance over 18 years with respect to each specific residency year. While there was an overall improvement in total scores with each advancing training year, year-over-year improvement in total examination performance began to plateau after Uro-2. Largest absolute performance improvement from Pre-Uro to Uro-4 were in subjects of "Urinary Diversion," "Obstructive Uropathy" and "Neoplasm." Scores in "Sexual Dysfunction, Endocrinopathy, Fertility Problems", and "Congenital Anomalies, Embryology, Anatomy" were consistently the lowest regardless of year of training. CONCLUSION: No significant change in performance was seen in each given year of residency over the 18-year period. There was improvement in overall scores as residents progressed through training, but scores plateaued after Uro-2 with minimal improvement between Uro-3 and Uro-4 years. Difference in subject scores suggests a disparity in educational focus in residency curricula and a potential need to improve the teaching strategies for subjects that tested less well throughout residency training.

The Feasibility of a Health Care Application in the Treatment of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

PURPOSE: Patients who undergo radical cystectomy of bladder cancer are at high risk for complications and hospital readmissions. Studies indicate insufficient preoperative education and perioperative monitoring. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a health care application to provide more patient education and more thorough monitoring perioperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with home Wi-Fi access who were undergoing radical cystectomy were recruited for this pilot trial. Each subject was provided a tablet preloaded with the m.Care (LifeScience Technologies, Leawood, Kansas) health care application, an accelerometer and vital sign equipment. Participants were asked to watch educational videos, use the provided accelerometer and perform vital sign monitoring. RESULTS: In 1 year 20 participants enrolled in the study and 15 completed it. The most frequently viewed videos were "Ileal Conduit versus Neobladder" and "Comprehensive Care Pathway." All participants used the accelerometer and 60% kept up with syncing the data regularly. The average step count preoperatively was 5,679 reflecting a sedentary population. Step counts decreased during the inpatient stay (1,351 steps) and trended toward baseline during the postoperative period (3,156 steps). Vital signs were recorded on 85% of assigned days and generated 33 triggers for intervention. While most triggers led to repeat assessment, education and encouragement, 4 participants underwent outpatient treatment, including cultures, intravenous fluids, antibiotics or dronabinol prescription, without the need for hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Providing more education and monitoring perioperatively is feasible using a health care application. Testing is warranted to determine the extent to which implementation will improve patient triaging and reduce readmissions.