Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Providers During the First 10 Months of Vaccine Availability: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers (HCPs)-including nurses-have played important roles in the vaccination effort. It is expected that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among HCPs has numerous consequences; however, the scope of these consequences and their impacts on providers, patients, and the broader healthcare system remained unclear. PURPOSE: To identify existing and emerging evidence to understand the state of knowledge of the consequences of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among HCPs. METHODS: A scoping review was completed based upon the JBI scoping review methodology. The databases searched included OVID Medline, EBSCOhost CINAHL, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, ProQuest APA PsycInfo, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The final literature search was completed on June 2, 2022. Studies were screened and retrieved based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria using Covidence reference management software. Data extraction followed criteria recommended in the JBI scoping review framework with additional relevant variables identified by the authors. RESULTS: A total of 33 sources were included in the review. Consequences of HCP COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were grouped under three themes and seven subthemes. Consequences affecting HCPs included health-related, psychosocial, and employment-related consequences. Consequences affecting patients pertained to COVID-19 vaccination communication and COVID-19 vaccination practices of HCPs. Consequences to the healthcare system involved consequences to coworkers and employment/attendance/staffing-related consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare provider COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was found to have numerous consequences. By understanding the scope and extent of these consequences, healthcare leaders, researchers, and HCPs can work together to protect providers, patients, and healthcare systems.

The complex nature of transportation as a key determinant of health in primary and community care restructuring initiatives in rural Canada.

It is well recognized that transportation is a barrier to healthcare access for rural-dwelling residents, particularly older adults. Healthcare restructuring initiatives seldom take into consideration the complexity of transportation, which acts as a barrier to appropriate and timely access to healthcare services for older adults in rural communities. This article presents findings of a qualitative research study that explored the complex nature of transportation challenges that rural-dwelling older adults experience in Western Canada when trying to access primary and community care services. Data were derived from a larger study of service user views on a healthcare restructuring initiative intended to facilitate aging-in-place. We conducted 15 focus groups and 9 interviews with a diverse sample of 83 older adults living in one urban centre and nine rural and small rural towns in British Columbia (BC)'s interior. We used content analysis to determine codes and derive themes. Study findings showed that transportation was a top priority for improving primary and community care. Older adult participants identified a range of transportation challenges in trying to get to healthcare services and care providers getting to them. Transportation was a social determinant of health (SDOH) for all participants, regardless of whether they lived in the urban centre or in a rural or small rural town. Our study provides more evidence to support that transportation is a key SDOH for rural-dwelling older adults. As such, transportation should be specifically addressed in healthcare restructuring initiatives that aim to support aging-in-place. Service providers need to advocate for system-wide solutions such as integrating transportation into the healthcare system, while it is imperative that decision-makers act on these solutions.

Development of a foot care model to determine the risk of foot problems among homeless adults in Canada.

Foot care is a common problem for homeless adults in cities, who often receive fragmented foot care services, resulting in increased foot problems, health complications, hospitalisation, limb removal and disabilities. Among the health factors that negatively affect the homeless, foot health is essential, but often neglected. This study employed a descriptive, cross-sectional research design to assess the foot care of homeless people and develop recommendations for clinical practice. Using Inlow's 60-s foot screening method, the foot conditions of a purposive sample of 65 homeless adults were examined in British Columbia, Canada, in 2019-2020. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Determinants, such as sex and years of homelessness significantly contributed to homeless individuals' risk of developing foot problems. Differences in perceived and observed foot problems were influenced by equitable access to social health and healthcare services. Foot assessment is not well-covered by homeless health services and should be implemented as part of the standard medical review of homeless patients. Furthermore, foot assessment should be conducted by healthcare professionals, rather than relying on the standard practice of service users' self-report. Finally, foot care should be based on tailoring assessments and interventions for the individualised needs of homeless service users. Future research must seek ways to integrate homeless individuals' voices in the development, implementation and evaluation of foot care services.

Usefulness of Abductive Reasoning in Nursing Education: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Hypothetico-deductive reasoning used by novice nurses could limit their ability to explain a presenting care situation in its entirety. Hence, scholars recommend the use of abductive reasoning as an alternative approach. PURPOSE: This study explored the effects of abductive reasoning training on baccalaureate nursing students' hypothesis generation abilities. METHOD: Through a pretest-posttest study, we delivered educational training on abductive reasoning and examined hypothesis accuracy, expertise, and breadth. Participants generated scenario-specific hypotheses before and after the training. Academic content experts validated the scenarios, and 2 independent raters scored participants' hypotheses. RESULTS: Twenty first- and second-year nursing students participated in this pilot study. Posttest scores showed a significant improvement in participants' hypothesis generation abilities: accuracy (P < .001), expertise (P < .001), and breadth (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Abductive reasoning training in nursing education may improve students' hypothesis generation abilities.

A concept analysis of abductive reasoning.

AIM: To describe an analysis of the concept of abductive reasoning. BACKGROUND: In the discipline of nursing, abductive reasoning has received only philosophical attention and remains a vague concept. In addition to deductive and inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning is not recognized even in prominent nursing knowledge development literature. Therefore, what abductive reasoning is and how it can inform nursing practice and education was explored. DESIGN: Concept analysis. DATA SOURCES: Combinations of specific keywords were searched in Web of Science, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PubMed, Medline and EMBASE. The analysis was conducted in June 2012 and only literature before this period was included. No time limits were set. METHODS: Rodger's evolutionary method for conducting concept analysis was used. RESULTS: Twelve records were included in the analysis. The most common surrogate term was retroduction, whereas related terms included intuition and pattern and similarity recognition. Antecedents consisted of a complex, puzzling situation and a clinician with creativity, experience and knowledge. Consequences included the formation of broad hypotheses that enhance understanding of care situations. Overall, abductive reasoning was described as the process of hypothesis or theory generation and evaluation. It was also viewed as inference to the best explanation. CONCLUSION: As a new approach, abductive reasoning could enhance reasoning abilities of novice clinicians. It can not only incorporate various ways of knowing but also its holistic approach to learning appears to be promising in problem-based learning. As nursing literature on abductive reasoning is predominantly philosophical, practical consequences of abductive reasoning warrant further research.

Comparative Analysis of External Validity Reporting in Non-randomized Intervention Studies.

This article describes a comparative analysis of external validity reporting in non-randomized behavioural and public health intervention studies that used and did not use the TREND (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs) statement. The search resulted in 14 non-randomized intervention studies that were rated based on Green and Glasgow's criteria for external validity reporting. Studies that used the TREND statement demonstrated improved external validity reporting when compared with studies that did not use the TREND statement. The implication is that the TREND statement and Green and Glasgow's criteria can improve external validity reporting of non-randomized behavioural and public health interventions.

Cet article présente une analyse comparative d'établissements de rapports de validité externe dans le cadre d'études d'interventions non aléatoires en matière de comportements et de santé publique faisant usage et ne faisant pas usage de l'énoncé TREND (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs). La recherche a relevé 14 études d'interventions non aléatoires, lesquelles ont été évaluées selon les critères de Green et Glasgow quant à l'établissement de rapports de validité externe. Les études ayant utilisé l'énoncé TREND ont démontré la présence de rapports de validité externe améliorés, en comparaison avec les études n'ayant pas fait usage de l'énoncé TREND. En conclusion, l'énoncé TREND et les critères de Green et Glasgow peuvent améliorer les rapports de validité externe d'interventions non aléatoires en matière de comportements et de santé publique.