ABSTRACT
Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Enterocutaneous fistula is defined as an abnormal connection between the gastrointestinal tract and the skin. In addition to the early recognition and treatment of sepsis, nutritional support, wound management, the adequate replacement of lost fluids with a properly set and timely rehydration treatment, together with the control of fistula production represent the first steps in treatment management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors present an overview of oral rehydration therapy, describing the properties and effects of individual solutions on fistula. The absorption of fluids and electrolytes into the gastrointestinal tract is performed by the group of sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters (sodium-glucose linked transporter, SGLT1). DISCUSSION: The water and electrolyte absorption mechanisms described in the article can be used in the treatment of a patient with a high fistula. The amount of administered hypotonic fluids (water, tea) should not exceed 500 ml/day. The remaining volume, depending on fistula loss, must be supplemented with isoosmolar fluids. With a good tolerance of oral rehydration solutions and compliance with the other steps of treatment, it is possible to remain on oral intake during the entire duration of treatment without the need to prohibit it completely, thus improving the patient's overall comfort. CONCLUSION: Reducing the intake of hypotonic fluids (tap water, tea) and administering an isotonic solution help to reduce the production of the fistula, thereby contributing to its spontaneous closure.