Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
2.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 16(4): 279-280, 2023 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994816
3.
4.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 15(4): 303-304, 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36377622
5.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 42(6): e161-e174, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36305922

ABSTRACT

Postextraction bone grafting and implant placement help preserve alveolar bone volume. Collagen wound dressings and soft tissue graft substitutes may help protect extraction socket bone grafts and provide better gingival contours. This randomized, controlled, multicenter, and double-blinded study was conducted to compare a control (wound dressing) and a test (soft tissue graft) substitute in nearly intact extraction sockets. Both test and control sockets were grafted with a xenogeneic bone graft. Graft containment, extraction socket soft tissue gap closure, gingival contour, and gingival thickness were examined over 16 weeks, at which time implants were placed. Healing was uneventful for both groups, and there was no significant difference (P < .05) between the times required to close the extraction socket soft tissue gap (~80% of sites closed by 8 weeks). Bone grafts were covered and contained longer in the test group (~4 weeks vs ~2 weeks), with less contour disruption out to 4 weeks; however, at implant placement, soft tissue contours in both groups were comparable, and soft tissue thicknesses were not significantly different.


Subject(s)
Tooth Extraction , Tooth Socket , Humans , Tooth Socket/surgery , Prospective Studies , Bone Transplantation , Bandages
6.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 15(3): 265-275, 2022 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36082660

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to generate an international and multidisciplinary consensus on the clinical management of implant protrusion into the maxillary sinuses and nasal fossae. A total of 31 experts participated, 23 of whom were experts in implantology (periodontologists, maxillofacial surgeons and implantologists), 6 were otolaryngologists and 2 were radiologists. All the participants were informed of the current scientific knowledge on the topic based on a systematic search of the literature. A list of statements was created and divided into three surveys: one for all participants, one for implant providers and radiologists and one for otolaryngologists and radiologists. A consensus was reached on 15 out of 17 statements. According to the participants, osseointegrated implants protruding radiographically into the maxillary sinus or nasal fossae require as much monitoring and maintenance as implants fully covered by bone. In the event of symptoms of sinusitis, collaboration between implant providers and otolaryngologists is required. Implant removal should be considered only after pharmacological and surgical management of sinusitis have failed.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Sinusitis , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Humans , Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging
8.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 15(2): 103-104, 2022 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546721
10.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 14(4): 343-344, 2021 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34726845
12.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 14(1): 3-4, 2021 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006067

Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dentistry
14.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 36(1): 122-25, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600532

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine if penicillin allergy and/or clindamycin therapy may contribute to a higher incidence of postsurgical infections after bone augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients between 2014 and 2019 who received bone augmentation procedures (socket grafting [SG]; ridge augmentation [RA]) prior to placement of dental implants. All the grafting procedures were performed under preoperative and postoperative oral antibiotic coverage with either amoxicillin or clindamycin for patients who reported penicillin allergy. Infections associated with the bone augmentation procedures were recorded. RESULTS: In this study, 1,814 patients received 2,961 bone augmentation procedures (2,530 SG, 431 RA). In the 2,530 SG procedures, 270 (10.7%) were associated with a penicillin allergy. Infections occurred in 91 of the 2,530 SG sites (3.6%). However, the infection rate was 10.7% (29 SG sites) for clindamycin and only 2.7% (62 SG sites) for amoxicillin (P < .02). In the 431 RA procedures, 71 (16.5%) were associated with a penicillin allergy. Overall infections occurred in 31 of the 431 sites (7.2%). However, the infection rate was 22.5% (16 RA sites) for clindamycin and only 4.2% for amoxicillin (15 RA sites; P < .01). Penicillin-allergic patients taking clindamycin demonstrated a higher risk of infection with a risk ratio of 6.9 (95% CI) and 4.5 (95% CI) compared with nonallergic patients taking amoxicillin for RA and SG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy and the use of clindamycin following SG and RA procedures was associated with a higher rate of infection and may be a risk factor for bone augmentation complications.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Dental Implants , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans , Penicillins/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528445

ABSTRACT

Vertical bone augmentation (VBA) procedures for dental implant placement are biologically and technically challenging. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies on VBA have failed to identify clinical procedures that provide superior results for treatment of the vertical ridge deficiencies. A decision tree was developed to guide clinicians on selecting treatment options based on reported vertical bone gains (< 5 mm, 5 to 8 mm, > 8 mm). The choice of a particular augmentation technique will also depend on other factors, including the size and morphology of the defect, location, and clinician or patient preferences. Surgeons should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each option for the clinical situation and select an approach with low complications, low cost, and the highest likelihood of success.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Dental Implants , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Decision Trees , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans
19.
20.
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) ; 12(4): 391-392, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31781695

Subject(s)
Social Media , Dentistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...