Management of Helicobacter pylori-related disorders.

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has opened new opportunities in the management of gastrointestinal disorders, with the cure of chronic ulcer disease now being possible for the first time. The 1994 United States National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference recommended that patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers unrelated to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) should be given eradication therapy. These guidelines were refined at a conference held recently in Maastricht. The updated guidelines strongly recommend treatment in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer disease, low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) gastric lymphoma, gastritis with severe macro-or microscopic changes and after resection of early gastric cancer. Despite a lack of hard scientific evidence, the guidelines also suggest that eradication treatment is advisable in patients with unequivocally diagnosed functional dyspepsia, a family history of gastric cancer, long-term treatment with proton-pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), planned or existing NSAID treatment, after gastric surgery for ulcer or cancer, or if the patient wants to be treated. Many different therapeutic regimens have been used previously, but at present the best treatment is proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy, comprising a proton-pump inhibitor plus two drugs out of clarithromycin, a nitroimidazole and amoxycillin. One-week low-dose triple therapy cures 85-95% of infected patients.

Motility of Helicobacter pylori in a viscous environment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastroduodenal disease produce gastric mucus of higher viscosity, and mucins that are of a smaller size, than normal. We have modelled these changes to the mucus layer in solutions of methylcellulose, and measured bacterial motility in biopsied mucus, to assess how they might influence the movements of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Motilities of Helicobacter pylori were measured in solutions of methylcellulose with molecular mass of 14 and 41 kDa, and in biopsied mucus with a Hobson BacTracker. Four parameters of bacterial motility were quantified: curvilinear velocity (CLV), path length, track linearity and curvature rate. RESULTS: All H. pylori were motile in methylcellulose solutions, and had optimal motilities at a viscosity of 3 cp (CLV in methylcellulose of 41 kDa, for instance, was 33 +/- 1.4 microm/s (mean +/- SEM) and the path length in methylcellulose of 41 kDa was 22.4 +/- 2 microm). At higher viscosities, mean CLVs, path lengths and curvature rates decreased, and track linearities increased in direct proportion to the increase in methylcellulose viscosity. Bacteria become non-motile at a viscosity of 50 cp in methylcellulose of 14 kDa, and at 70 cp in methylcellulose of 41 kDa. Mean CLVs, path lengths and curvature rates (but not track linearities) were greater in methylcellulose of 41 kDa than in methylcellulose of 14 kDa at each viscosity tested. Motilities of H. pylori from patients with duodenal ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia in methylcellulose solutions were not significantly different. H. pylori had poor motility in biopsied mucus, but became highly motile when biopsied mucus was diluted with saline. CONCLUSIONS: The viscosity-motility profiles of H. pylori in methylcellulose and the motilities of H. pylori in biopsied mucus suggest (1) that H. pylori may have poor motility in mucus at the epithelial surface, but high motility at the luminal surface of the mucus layer, and (2) that the increased mucus viscosity and decreased mucin size in patients with gastroduodenal disease act in combination to decrease H. pylori motility in vivo.

Incidence of duodenal ulcer healing after 1 week of proton pump inhibitor triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The Lansoprazole Helicobacter Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of short-term twice-daily Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens but few have investigated the proportion of patients in whom duodenal ulcer disease was healed with these regimens. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of four 1-week H. pylori eradication regimens in the healing of H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: Following endoscopic confirmation of duodenal ulcer disease and a positive CLO test, patients underwent a 13C-urea breath test to confirm H. pylori status. Treatment with one of four regimens: LAC, LAM, LCM or OAM, where L is lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., A is amoxycillin 1 g b.d., M is metronidazole 400 mg b.d., C is clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., and O is omeprazole 20 mg b.d., was assigned randomly to those patients who were H. pylori positive, with 62 (LAC), 64 (LAM), 61 (LCM) and 75 (OAM) patients in each treatment group. Follow-up breath tests and endoscopies were performed at least 28 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Duodenal ulcer disease was healed 28 days after treatment in 53/62 (85.5%) patients who were treated with LAC, 52/64 (81.3%) of patients treated with LAM, 49/61 (80.3%) of patients treated with LCM and 60/75 (80.0%) of patients treated with OAM (intention-to-treat analysis, n = 262, assumed unhealed if no follow-up endoscopy was performed). All the treatments were of similar efficacy (P = 0.85, chi-squared test) with regard to the healing of duodenal ulcer disease. CONCLUSIONS: The four 1-week treatment regimens were equally effective in healing H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease.

Is the only good Helicobacter a dead Helicobacter?

BACKGROUND: Vast numbers of therapeutic studies of various drug regimens used for the cure of H. pylori infection have been published. However, many of these studies have been uncontrolled, included small numbers of patients, were published only as abstracts, differed widely in dosage sizes, schedules and durations and were of insufficient statistical power to make meaningful statements concerning their efficacy. Furthermore, there are no clear or universally accepted guidelines for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Thus, there remains profound confusion among practitioners on whom and how to treat. OBJECTIVE: To critically review the currently available management strategies for H. pylori infection. METHODS: Review of the literature. RESULTS: Treatment of H. pylori requires the use of multiple drug regimens (triple therapy) which can be expensive and is often associated with side effects. Bad choice of treatments, poor patient counseling and compliance will lead to the emergence of resistant H. pylori strains. Resistance to H. pylori to metronidazole is already widespread and resistance to other antimicrobial agents is increasing. The resource/financial implications are not negligible. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of kits that will enable the identification of pathogenic strains of H. pylori in the office setting may decrease the number of patients being given H. pylori eradication therapy, but much more evidence is needed to establish the practical value of such tests. In the meantime, as many clinicians adhere to the idea that the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori, the best practical policy option is education concerning the correct diagnostic methodology, correct choice of patients and the correct choice of treatment regimens. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has revolutionized our concepts of etiology, pathophysiology and treatment of many foregut diseases. Gastritis, gastric ulcer (GU), duodenal ulcer (DU), gastric cancer, MALT gastric lymphoma and other conditions are now regarded as being independent on the colonization of the stomach by H. pylori. Many aspects of pathophysiology, such as the abnormalities of gastric acid secretion in duodenal ulcer disease, now for the first time fall into a logical and comprehensible pattern.

Management of Helicobacter pylori-related disorders.

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has opened new opportunities in the management of gastrointestinal disorders, with the cure of chronic ulcer disease now being possible for the first time. The 1994 United States National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference recommended that patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers unrelated to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) should be given eradication therapy. These guidelines were refined at a conference held recently in Maastricht. The updated guidelines strongly recommend treatment in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer disease, low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) gastric lymphoma, gastritis with severe macro- or microscopic changes and after resection of early gastric cancer. Despite a lack of hard scientific evidence, the guidelines also suggest that eradication treatment is advisable in patients with unequivocally diagnosed functional dyspepsia, a family history of gastric cancer, long-term treatment with proton-pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), planned or existing NSAID treatment, after gastric surgery for ulcer or cancer, or if the patient wants to be treated. Many different therapeutic regimens have been used previously, but at present the best treatment is proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy, comprising a proton-pump inhibitor plus two drugs out of clarithromycin, a nitroimidazole and amoxycillin. One-week low-dose triple therapy cures 85-95% of infected patients.

Recurrence of duodenal ulcer after Helicobacter pylori eradication is related to high acid output.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the recurrence of duodenal ulcers. It is unclear why duodenal ulcers rarely recur in the absence of reinfection with H. pylori or NSAID treatment. METHODS: Basal, gastrin-releasing peptide- and pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid outputs in patients with ulcer relapse after H. pylori eradication were measured, and compared with patients without ulcer relapse after H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output was significantly higher in H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcers than in H. pylori-negative controls, and fell significantly after H. pylori eradication. In H. pylori-negative patients with recurrent duodenal ulcers, pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output was significantly higher than in controls and similar to H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that duodenal ulcer relapse after eradication of H. pylori may be related to high pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output. In this subset of patients with duodenal ulcers, maintenance anti-secretory treatment may be necessary to prevent relapse.

One week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre comparative study. Lansoprazole Helicobacter Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori cures and prevents the relapse of duodenal ulceration and also results in histological resolution of chronic active gastritis. AIM: To compare four treatment regimens lasting seven days of a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics in the eradication of H pylori. PATIENTS: Men or women with H pylori positive duodenal ulceration or gastritis, or both. METHODS: A single blind, prospectively randomised, parallel group, comparative, multicentre study. After a positive CLO test, patients underwent histology, H pylori culture, and a 13C urea breath test to confirm H pylori status. Treatment with one of four regimens: LAC, LAM, LCM, or OAM, where L is 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily, A is 1 g of amoxycillin twice daily, M is 400 mg of metronidazole twice daily, C is 250 mg of clarithromycin twice daily, and O is 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily, was assigned randomly. A follow up breath test was done at least 28 days after completing treatment. RESULTS: H pylori eradication (intention to treat) was 104/121 (86.0%) with LAC, 87/131 (66.4%) with LAM, 103/118 (87.3%) with LCM, and 94/126 (74.6%) with OAM. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the proportion of patients in whom eradication was successful between LAC and LCM when compared with LAM, but no significant difference (p = 0.15) between LAM and OAM. Metronidazole resistance before treatment was identified as a significant prognostic factor with regard to eradication of H pylori. The regimens which contained metronidazole were significantly less effective than those without metronidazole in the presence of pretreatment resistant H pylori. There was no difference among the treatment groups with regard to the incidence and severity of adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: All four treatment regimens were safe and effective in eradicating H pylori in the patient population studied. LAC was the most efficacious treatment in patients with pretreatment metronidazole resistant H pylori, and was significantly better than LAM and OAM in this group of patients.

Lansoprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole for seven days in Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: This study determines the efficacy and safety of a 1-week triple therapy regimen of lansoprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole in an area with a high prevalence of pre-treatment metronidazole-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Seventy-five H. pylori positive patients with gastritis or duodenal ulcer were entered into an open study of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. H. pylori status was determined by CLOtest, histology, culture and by 13C-urea breath test (repeated > or = 28 days after treatment). RESULTS: Seventy-one patients completed the treatment and returned for follow-up. H. pylori was eradicated in 61 of 71 (86%) patients by per-protocol analysis, and in 61 of 75 (81%) patients by intention-to-treat analysis. H. pylori was eradicated in 12 of 16 (75%) patients with metronidazole-resistant strains compared with 22 of 24 (92%) in patients with metronidazole-sensitive strains of H. pylori (P = 0.14). Fourty-five patients reported at least one adverse event, and three patients stopped treatment due to them (two with headaches and one with diarrhoea). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. eradicates H. pylori in up to 86% of patients. It is of proven benefit in patients with pre-treatment metronidazole-resistant strains of H. pylori.

Relation between gastric acid output, Helicobacter pylori, and gastric metaplasia in the duodenal bulb.

BACKGROUND: Factors that determine gastric metaplasia in the duodenal bulb are ill defined. It is more common and extensive in the presence of high acid output and possibly in the presence of Helicobacter pylori. However, no quantitative relation between acid output and the extent of gastric metaplasia has been demonstrated and its relation to H pylori is uncertain. AIM: To determine the relation between H pylori infection and acid output and the presence and extent of gastric metaplasia in the duodenal bulb. subjects: H pylori positive and negative patients with duodenal ulcer and healthy controls were studied. METHODS: Quadrantic duodenal bulb biopsy specimens were taken and the presence and extent of gastric metaplasia determined using a computer enhanced image intensifier. Basal and stimulated acid outputs were measured. RESULTS: gastric metaplasia was significantly (p < 0.05 more common and significantly (p < 0.05) greater in extent in patients with duodenal ulcer than in controls. Neither the prevalence or extent of gastric metaplasia was affected by H pylori status. There were significant (p < 0.01) direct correlations between acid output and extent of gastric metaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence and extent of gastric metaplasia are not related to H pylori in controls, or in patients with duodenal ulcer. Rather, high acid response to gastrin may be more important.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer lowers basal and peak acid outputs to gastrin releasing peptide and pentagastrin.

BACKGROUND: Patients with duodenal ulcer (DU) have high basal (BAO) and peak (PAO) acid outputs. The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on these variables is unclear. AIM: To discover if gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with DU is caused by H pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BAO, gastrin releasing peptide (GRP), and pentagastrin stimulated PAO in 10 H pylori negative controls, and in 10 H pylori positive patients with DU was measured before and six months after H pylori eradication. H pylori status was determined by histology, culture, and by the 13C-urea breath test. After collecting a 30 minute basal aspirate, GRP 40 pmol/kg/h was infused for 45 minutes, and after a 30 minute washout, pentagastrin 6 micrograms/kg was injected intramuscularly. RESULTS: Basal and stimulated acid output (PAOGRP and PAOPg) were significantly higher in H pylori positive DU than in H pylori negative controls. Six months after H pylori eradication, basal and stimulated acid outputs were all significantly lower than before H pylori eradication. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that BAO, PAOGRP, and PAOPg are higher in H pylori positive DU than in H pylori negative controls. All decreased significantly six months after H pylori eradication, to fall within the range of controls. These results are compatible with a hypothesis that acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer disease is caused by H pylori infection.

Parietal cells in the duodenal bulb and their relation to Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM: To investigate the prevalence, and relation to Helicobacter pylori, of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb using a monoclonal antibody directed against H+,K(+)-ATPase (HK12.18). METHODS: Twenty six patients with duodenal ulcer disease and 16 healthy controls were studied. H pylori status was determined by gastric histology and culture and by the 13C-urea breath test. Four biopsy specimens were taken from the duodenal bulb and stained with HK12.18. The presence/absence and number of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb were assessed blindly by a histopathologist. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb was 31% (13/42) and was similar in patients with duodenal ulcer and in controls, and in H pylori positive and negative subjects. The median (range) number of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb was 7.5 (4-20) parietal cells/subject, and was similar in all four groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb (31%) is notably higher than previously reported in endoscopic studies, and is in keeping with reports from studies on necropsy/operative specimens. There was no difference in the prevalence or number of parietal cells in the duodenal bulb between patients with duodenal ulcer and controls, regardless of H pylori status. These findings suggest that parietal cells in the duodenal bulb do not contribute to the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer.

Helicobacter pylori and upper gastrointestinal disease: a survey of gastroenterologists in the United Kingdom.

The objective of this study was to conduct a survey of the opinions and practices of gastroenterologists in the United Kingdom concerning the impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on the management of upper gastrointestinal diseases. A postal questionnaire was sent to all medically qualified members of the British Society of Gastroenterology working in the UK. Replies were received from 670 of 1037 eligible BSG members (65%). Of these, 73% thought that H pylori was a cause of duodenal ulcer and 84% thought that eradication of H pylori decreased ulcer recurrence in comparison with acid suppression. While 80% used anti-H pylori therapy for a chronic relapsing duodenal ulcer, only 25% used such therapy for an ulcer at first presentation and 17% never used anti-H pylori therapy for patients with duodenal ulcer. Although 75% of respondents did not agree that H pylori was a cause of non-ulcer dyspepsia, 69% used anti-H pylori therapy to treat a patient with this condition. At the time of the survey, 69% of those who used anti-H pylori therapy adopted some variant of standard triple therapy. Only 7% routinely tested for bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics and only 22% assessed their patients for eradication after treatment. There was a lack of consensus about whether H pylori was a cause of gastric ulcer or gastric cancer with only 47% and 17% respectively believing in these associations. In conclusion, at the time of the survey, the use of anti-H pylori therapy had been accepted by a majority of specialist UK gastroenterologists in the management of upper gastrointestinal disease. There was, however, a substantial degree of uncertainty and divergence about which patients should be treated.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Although there are numerous publications reporting eradication results, the general picture is confused by the bewildering multiplicity of treatment schedules employed by the various workers. The over-riding need now is for large scale trials, and more especially for direct comparisons of different treatment regimens in the same populations of patients. Such data are entirely absent from the literature at present. Standardization of definitions and of methodology pertaining to diagnosis of eradication, recording of side effects, measurement of compliance and determination of recurrence or of reinfection, is badly needed. As the definition of eradication remains arbitrary, it is important to include genome fingerprinting techniques in the long-term follow-up for recurrence, so that the question of reinfection versus recrudescence can be examined (Bell et al, 1993b; Xia et al, 1994). Because of the wide differences in the agents used in H. pylori eradication therapies, proper double-blinding of treatment trials remains a difficult problem. This can be dealt with to some extent by ensuring that the interpretation of tests for H. pylori eradication is performed by personnel unaware of the clinical details. Review of the existing data on eradication of H. pylori indicates that clinically useful results can be achieved in some 70 to 95% of patients, on an intention to treat basis. Compliance, side effects and resistance to metronidazole remain the limiting factors. Efficacy, freedom from side effects, simplicity and low cost will determine the success of any regimen in the future. At present, it is not possible to make firm recommendations in favour of one regimen over another, but it seems reasonable to forecast that dual therapies consisting of a PPI and an antibiotic will receive much attention. Preparations consisting of an H2RA associated with a bismuth compound, which are used together with an antibiotic are an interesting approach. Compliance should be as good as with a normal dual therapy and the eradication results look promising (Wyeth et al, 1994; Webb et al, 1994). The advantages of dual therapies that include a PPI lie in their simplicity, in not relying on imidazole for their anti-H. pylori effect but on the profound inhibition of acid output produced by the PPI. Thus PPI based dual therapy can probably evoke better compliance than the more complicated regimens. The use of PPIs has other advantages in addition to decreasing the MIC90 of the antibiotic combined with it. This is because administration of a powerful inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, such as a PPI, will aid the rapid healing of an ulcer crater and will rapidly relieve the symptoms of peptic ulceration. Gastrin releasing peptide-stimulated acid secretion is raised in duodenal ulcer patients to approximately sixfold over control levels according to El-Omar et al (1993b), and although it returns to normal following the eradication of H. pylori, this process takes time to become effective (El-Omar et al, 1993a). Suppression of acid output provides an immediate therapeutic shield, while the decrease in inflammation and acid output secondary to H. pylori eradication can be established. The most widespread resistance to antibiotics exhibited by H. pylori is with respect to imidazoles. The prevalence of metronidazole resistance is widespread in the emergent countries (Glupczynski et al, 1990), but it is also appreciable in the West, especially in women, who may have been given metronidazole in the treatment of pelvic infections (Rautelin et al, 1992; Banatvala et al, 1994). Moreover, H. pylori becomes resistant to metronidazole very easily and often as a result of treatment which includes an imidazole compound (Malfertheiner, 1993; Banatavala et al, 1994). On the other hand, H. pylori resistance to macrolides is not widespread and does not develop easily during their administration. It is difficult to forecast which antibiotic will be the most widely used agent