Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Med J ; 37(4): 446-9, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27052289

ABSTRACT

Malignant melanomas (MM) of the oral cavity are extremely rare, accounting for 0.2% to 8.0% of all malignant melanomas. Malignant melanomas is more frequently seen at the level of the hard palate and gingiva. Early diagnosis and treatment are important for reducing morbidity. Malignant melanoma cells stain positively with antibodies to human melanoma black 45, S-100 protein, and vimentin; therefore, immunohistochemistry can play an important role in evaluating the depth of invasion and the location of metastases. A 76-year-old man developed an oral malignant melanoma, which was originally diagnosed as a bluish reactive denture hyperplasia caused by an ill-fitting lower denture. The tumor was removed surgically, and histopathological examination revealed a nodular-type MM. There was no evidence of recurrence over a 4-year follow-up period.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis
2.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 44(2): 126-33, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732635

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effect of platelet-rich fibrin on bone regeneration in critical size defects in the calvaria of diabetic rabbits. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 40 male New Zealand rabbits, were divided into two groups a non-diabetic control group (Group A) and a diabetic experimental group (Group B). Two bicortical circular defects 15 mm in diameter were created in the parietal bone of each animal. Each group was further divided into four groups: subgroup E, the defect was left empty; subgroup PRF, the defects were filled only with PRF; subgroup AB, the defects were filled with autogenous bone; subgroup AB + PRF, the defects were filled with autogenous bone combined with PRF. The animals sacrificed at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Bone formation was assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning, histological and histomorphometric analysis. RESULT: The total percent of new bone was the lowest in group A-E (6.77 ± 0.21 at 4 weeks, 11.01 ± 0.37 at 8 weeks) and highest in group A-AB + PRF (21.66 ± 0.91 at 4 weeks, 37.46 ± 1.25 at 8 weeks; p < 0.05). The mean percent of new bone was greatest in group B-AB + PRF at 4 and 8 weeks (16.87 ± 0.92, 29.59 ± 1.09, respectively) and lowest in group B-E (5.83 ± 0.09 at 4 weeks, 7.36 ± 1.02 at 8 weeks). CONCLUSION: This study, despite its limitations, showed that PRF can be used safely and that PRF induced bone healing in diabetic rabbits.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets/physiology , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Fibrin/pharmacology , Animals , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus , Male , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Rabbits , X-Ray Microtomography
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 69(5): 1350-4, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21292371

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the heat generated from implant drilling using stainless steel and ceramic drills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 fresh bovine femoral cortical bone samples were used in this study. A constant drill load of 2.0 kg was applied throughout the drilling procedures via a drilling rig at a speed of 1,500 rpm. Two different implant drill types (stainless steel and ceramic) were evaluated. Heat was measured with type K thermocouple from 3 different depths. Data were subjected to the independent-sample t test and Pearson correlation analysis. The α level was set a priori at 0.05. RESULTS: The mean maximum temperatures at the depths of 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm with the stainless steel drill were 32.15°C, 35.94°C, and 37.05°C, respectively, and those with the ceramic drill were 34.49°C, 36.73°C, and 36.52°C, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found at the depth of 3 mm (P = .014) whereas there was no significant difference at the depths of 6 and 9 mm (P > .05) between stainless steel and ceramic drills. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, although more heat was generated in the superficial part of the drilling cavity with the ceramic drill, heat modifications seemed not to be correlated with the drill type, whether stainless steel or ceramic, in the deep aspect of the cavity. Further clinical studies are required to determine the effect of drill type on heat generation.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature/physiology , Ceramics , Dental Alloys , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/instrumentation , Femur/surgery , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Stainless Steel , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cattle , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Equipment Design , Hot Temperature , Materials Testing , Osteotomy/methods , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Thermometers , Time Factors
4.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 67(12): 2663-8, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19925988

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heat generated in bone by 2 implant drill systems in vitro with and without using surgical drill guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temperature was measured with K type thermocouple in vitro using the bovine femoral cortical bone model. A constant drill load of 2.0 kg was applied throughout the drilling procedures via a drilling rig at a speed of 1,500 rpm. Two different implant drill systems-System A (with external irrigation) and System B (with both external and internal irrigation)-were evaluated. The samples were divided into 4 groups. System A test group 1 (TG1) included the following: 20 samples for drilling with surgical drill guides; control group 1 (CG1): 20 samples for classical implant site preparation. System B test group 2 (TG2) included the following: 20 samples for drilling with surgical drill guides; control group 2 (CG2): 20 samples for classical implant site preparation. Heat was measured at the final drill in the drilling sequence (4.2 and 4.4 mm). Thermocouples were placed at a 1-mm distance from the osteotomy area at depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm. Heat measurements were recorded out to 50 uses by a software program. Data were subjected to the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The alpha level was set a priori at 0.05. RESULTS: The mean maximum temperatures at the depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm using surgical drill guides were 34.2 degrees , 39.7 degrees , and 39.8 degrees C, respectively, although without using surgical drill guides the values were 28.8 degrees , 30.7 degrees , and 31.1 degrees C. A statistically significant difference was found at the depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm between using surgical drill guides and classical drilling procedure. CONCLUSIONS: From a heat generation standpoint, we conclude that preparing an implant site with using surgical drill guides generates heat more than classical implant site preparation regardless of the irrigation type.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Instruments , Hot Temperature , Animals , Cattle , Dental High-Speed Technique , In Vitro Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...