A pilot with a helicopter in the left atrium: a case report of an embolized Watchman device.

BACKGROUND: Embolization of a Watchman device in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is a rare complication. Retrieval of the device can be achieved percutaneously with a snaring technique or a bioptome. CASE SUMMARY: We present an illustrative case of Watchman closure device embolization during an LAA closure attempt in a 77-year-old man. The complication was caused by anatomical restraints of the LAA, in particular limited depth resulting in poor stability of the closure device after implantation. By the use of a double snaring technique, however, we managed to retrieve the device percutaneously. By applying such strategy, a more invasive surgical approach can be prevented. DISCUSSION: Prompt response is needed when embolization of a Watchman device occurs. A snaring technique can be used in most cases to attempt device retrieval. A double snaring technique is in this case associated with higher retrieval success than a single snaring technique.

Frequency and predictors of cholesterol target attainment in patients with stable coronary heart disease in Belgium: results from the Dyslipidemia International Study II (DYSIS II CHD).

Objectives: To document the frequency and predictors of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target value attainment among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in Belgium. Methods: The second Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS II) was an observational study of the prevalence of dyslipidemias and lipid target value attainment. Patients in this analysis were aged ≥ 18, had documented CHD, and had a full lipid profile. Use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), lipid profile, and LDL-C target value attainment (< 70 mg/dL) were assessed cross-sectionally at the enrollment visit. The distribution of LLTs was assessed among treated patients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables predictive of LDL-C target value attainment in treated patients. Results: We identified 409 patients with CHD in Belgium, 387 (94.6%) of whom were on LLT at the time of the lipid profile. Among treated patients, the rate of LDL-C target value attainment was 40.6%, and statin monotherapy was the most commonly used LLT (79.3%). Among users of statin monotherapy or combination therapy, simvastatin was the most commonly used treatment (41.6% of patients). Diabetes was associated with higher odds of LDL-C target value attainment (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.33-3.93), and female gender was associated with lower odds (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97). Conclusion: Rates of LDL-C target value attainment are low in patients with CHD in Belgium. Intensifying statin therapy or combining it with non-statins is essential in Belgian patients for optimal LDL-C reduction.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the Belgian registry.

AIMS: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy at midterm follow-up of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using different devices, in real life in Belgium. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between June 2009 and November 2016, 457 consecutive patients (63% male, 75±12 yrs, CHA2DS2-VASc 4±0.6, HAS-BLED 3.5±0.7) undergoing LAAO were included. Technical success was 97.1%. There were 19 periprocedural major adverse events (4.1%) including three deaths (0.6%), nine tamponades (1.9%), four major bleedings (0.8%) and two device embolisations (0.4%). Among patients successfully implanted having a complete follow-up (672 patient-years, median follow-up 370 days), the actual annual stroke rate was 1.2%, lower than the expected stroke risk of 4% (70% reduction). The observed bleeding rate was 2%, while the calculated risk was 3.7% (46% reduction). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a similar overall survival (93±2% and 87±3% versus 91±3% and 87±4%; p=0.35) and event-free survival (92±2% and 84±3% versus 88±3% and 80±5%; p=0.17) at one and two years, for the ACP/Amulet versus the WATCHMAN groups of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the Belgian left atrial appendage occlusion registry suggest that the procedure is effective and relatively safe in a real-world setting, using either the WATCHMAN or the ACP/Amulet device.

The COMmon control of hypErtenSion and Therapeutic Attitudes in Belgium and Luxemburg study (COME STAI).

STUDY AIM: The aim of this study was to assess hypertension management in general practice in Belgium and Luxembourg, shortly before the publication of the 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for arterial hypertension management. METHODS: A total of 516 general physicians evaluated 10,078 consecutive hypertensive patients. All used the same definitions to assess cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: Systolic (S) blood pressure (BP) was 139 ± 19 mmHg, diastolic (D) BP 80 ± 11 mmHg, patients were 64 ± 13 years old and their body mass index (BMI) was 28 ± 5 kg/m2 (mean ± SD). Treatment remained unchanged in 71% of the patients with a SBP ≥ 140 mmHg. Those on ≥ 2 antihypertensive drugs were older, had higher BMI, slower HR, higher perceived cardiovascular risk, but lower BP (all P ≤ 0.001 vs no and monotherapy groups). Patients in whom treatment was intensified were at higher cardiovascular risk, as substantiated by an increased prevalence of males, a higher BP, a faster HR and a larger BMI (all P ≤ 0.0001). High cardiovascular risk patients underwent more frequent treatment simplifications with fixed-combination therapies or the addition of another antihypertensive class (all P ≤ 0.0001 vs not at high cardiovascular risk). Among the 523 patients older than 80 years with SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, treatment intensification occurred in 32% when SBP ≥ 150 mmHg, and in 10% when SBP was between 140 and 149 mmHg (P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The COME STAI study suggests that there is still room for improvement in hypertension control in Belgium and Luxembourg.

Long-term effect of molsidomine, a direct nitric oxide donor, as an add-on treatment, on endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the MEDCOR trial.

OBJECTIVE: The MEDCOR trial is a double-blind, randomized study aiming at demonstrating the superiority of molsidomine (direct NO donor) over placebo, used as add-on treatments, on improving endothelial function (EF) after 12 months, in stable angina patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: EF was assessed by peripheral vasodilator response (i.e. Endoscore) using arterial tonometry and by several biomarkers, in terms of changes versus baseline after a one-year treatment. RESULTS: The change in Endoscore was +75 ± 130% in placebo group and +39 ± 145% in molsidomine group (p = 0.143). There was a decrease in sICAM-1 with molsidomine (-6%) and an increase with placebo (+6%). The MPO activity/antigen ratio slightly increased with placebo (+9%) and strongly decreased with molsidomine (-42%) (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The MEDCOR trial was not able to demonstrate significant differences between molsidomine and placebo for all parameters, except the MPO activity/antigen ratio which significantly decreased with molsidomine (p = 0.020 versus placebo).

Prevalence, associated factors and management implications of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a two-year, two-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) develop cardiogenic shock due to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction - there is, however, a paucity of data regarding this condition. METHODS: Prevalence, associated factors and management implications of LVOT obstruction in TTC was explored, based on two-year data from two Belgian heart centres. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with TTC were identified out of 3,272 patients presenting with troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome. In six patients diagnosed with TTC (19%), a significant LVOT obstruction was detected by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients with LVOT obstruction were older and had more often septal bulging, and presented more frequently in cardiogenic shock as compared to those without LVOT obstruction (P < 0.05). Moreover, all patients with LVOT obstruction showed systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior mitral valve leaflet, which was associated with a higher grade of mitral regurgitation (2.2±0.7 vs. 1.0±0.6, P<0.001). Adequate therapeutic management including fluid resuscitation, cessation of inotropic therapy, intravenous ß-blocker, and the use of intra-aortic balloon pump resulted in non-inferior survival in TTC patients with LVOT obstruction as compared to those without LVOT obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: TTC is complicated by LVOT obstruction in approximately 20% of cases. Older age, septal bulging, SAM-induced mitral regurgitation and hemodynamic instability are associated with this condition. Timely and accurate diagnosis of LVOT obstruction by echocardiography is key to successful management of these TTC patients with LVOT obstruction and results in a non-inferior outcome as compared to those patients without LVOT obstruction.

Double-blind parallel placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of molsidomine on the endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the MEDCOR Trial.

The effects of molsidomine (a direct nitric oxide donor) on the endothelial dysfunction have never been evaluated using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT). The objective of the MEDCOR double-blind trial will be to demonstrate the superiority of molsidomine (Coruno® 16 mg, once daily) over placebo, on improving the endothelial function (Endoscore by RH-PAT) after 12 months of treatment in stable angina patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Study design will take care of the real-life situation, in which patients are being offered PCI and stent placement (drug-eluting or bare metal), but also gold standard medical therapy (beta-blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and/or calcium antagonists). Demonstrating clinical and statistical superiority of the study drug over placebo will be a real challenge. Therefore, a sequential approach has been designed with a pilot phase aiming at recruiting 50 patients. Upon evaluation of the results by an independent data steering committee, a larger sample size phase will eventually be considered.

A critical review on telemonitoring in heart failure.

Morbidity and mortality remain high in heart failure despite considerable progress achieved with medical therapy and electrical devices. A multidisciplinary approach is actually strongly recommended. In order to provide optimal care to the ever-growing population of patients with heart failure, telemonitoring has been proposed as a modality to improve usual care. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence on telemonitoring in HF. Despite two major meta-analyses with favourable results, two recent, large, multicentre, randomized controlled trials, one with a sophisticated technical remote telemonitoring approach (TIM-HF) in stable chronic HF and the other with a comprehensive telephone-based interactive voice-response monitoring (Tele-HF) in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure, have been performed and both failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit for telemonitoring. Newer technologies or other modalities, such as collaboration between a general practitioner and a heart failure clinic facilitated by telemonitoring should be further evaluated. Dedicated telemonitoring for heart failure may be a practical adjunct in selective centres and patients, on top of usual care, including education and a multidisciplinary approach. However, prior to being accepted as a standard of care, more evidence from large, randomized clinical trials is required.

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status and emerging therapies.

Stroke is the most common cardiovascular disorder after heart disease, with a high mortality and often poor quality of life in survivors. Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most commonly occurring sustained cardiac arrhythmia increases the risk of stroke by five. However, stroke risk is not homogeneous and varies with associated morbidities and risk factors. Risk assessment scores have been developed and according to the calculated level of risk, guidelines recommend treatment with antithrombotic agents, preferably vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Despite these recommendations many patients with AF do not receive adequate thromboprophylaxis. The presence of AF is often not recognized and VKA are underused due to doctor- or patient-related factors and intrinsic disadvantages of these drugs. An awareness campaign for the diagnosis of AF is warranted, highlighting the risk of stroke. Novel anticoagulants that largely overcome many of the limitations of vitamin K antagonists are becoming available.

Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg compared to rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled despite prior statin monotherapy.

AIMS: This post hoc analysis compared the effects of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (EZE/SIMVA) or rosuvastatin 10 mg (ROSUVA) in uncontrolled high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients with/without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) despite statin monotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 618) at high risk for coronary vascular disease with elevated LDL-C ≥100 and ≤190 mg/dL despite use of statins were randomized 1:1 to double-blind EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg or ROSUVA 10 mg for 6 weeks. Patients were classified as having T2DM based on ≥1 of the following: diagnosis of T2DM, antidiabetic medication, or FPG ≥126 mg/dL. This analysis evaluated percent changes from baseline in lipids among patients with (n = 182) and without T2DM (n = 434). RESULTS: EZE/SIMVA was more effective than ROSUVA at lowering LDL-C, TC, non-HDL-C, and apo B in the overall study population and within both subgroups. Numerically, greater between-treatment reductions in LDL-C, TC, non-HDL-C, and apo B were seen in patients with T2DM versus those without T2DM. A significant interaction (P= 0.015) was seen for LDL-C indicating that patients with T2DM achieved larger between-group reductions versus those without T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg versus ROSUVA 10 mg provided superior lipid reductions in patients with/without T2DM.

Lipid-altering efficacy of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk patients with and without metabolic syndrome.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a clustering of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk factors. This post-hoc analysis compared the effects of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg in a cohort of 618 high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients with (n=368) and without (n=217) MetS who had previously been on statin monotherapy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to double-blind ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks. Least squares mean percent change from baseline and 95% confidence intervals in lipid efficacy parameters were calculated for the population and within subgroups. Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin was significantly more effective than rosuvastatin at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, non- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (all p<0.001). No significant differences in treatment effects were seen between the presence and absence of MetS. In this post-hoc analysis of high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients the lipid-reducing effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin were not altered significantly by the presence of MetS.

Where does the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and/or ezetimibe treatment stand today?

The evidence of the different concepts underlying the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and ezetimibe treatment were reviewed in the light of the eight major trials where cholesterol absorption and synthesis were analyzed on a large scale using the plasma levels of precursors of cholesterol and plant sterols. The only concept supported in all studies is a significant and consistent increase of cholesterol absorption with statin (correlated with the inhibition of synthesis) and of cholesterol synthesis with ezetimibe, whereas in combination, statin and ezetimibe reduce both cholesterol synthesis and absorption. In contrast, most of the other concepts failed to be clearly proven. At baseline, the inverse relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis (only examined in two studies) was found to be weak. On statin treatment, four studies showed that the changes in cholesterol synthesis and absorption, contributed less than 9% to the variability in cholesterol response to statin therapy. It has not been consistently demonstrated that good absorbers/bad synthesizers are bad responders to statin (6 studies) and good responders for ezetimibe (3 studies). There is also no clear inverse correlation between LDL reduction on statin treatment and that on ezetimibe treatment. Finally, the original idea from the first pioneer study of Miettinen et al. that, the higher the baseline intestinal ability to absorb cholesterol, the lower the benefit on the clinical cardiovascular outcomes was not reproduced in the PROSPER study. In conclusion, with the exception of a reverse effect of statin and ezetimibe on absorption and synthesis, most ideas supporting the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis lacked consistency between studies. At present, the use of the plasma levels of plant sterols and cholesterol precursors as markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis is far too limited to definitively solve these questions.

Switching from statin monotherapy to ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin modifies the relationships between apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol in patients at high risk of coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relationships between apolipoprotein B (Apo B), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-HDL-C in high-risk patients treated with lipid-lowering therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: This post-hoc analysis calculated LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels corresponding to an Apo B of 0.9 g/L following treatment with 1) statin monotherapy (baseline) and 2) ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20mg or rosuvastatin 10mg (study end). The percentages of patients reaching LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B targets were calculated at study end. RESULTS: After switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin, the LDL-C and non-HDL-C corresponding to Apo B=0.9 g/L were closer to the more aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals (1.81 and 2.59 mmol/L, respectively). Only slightly >50% of the patients who reached minimum recommended LDL-C or non-HDL-C at study end also had an Apo B level <0.9 g/L with both treatments. CONCLUSION: The use of Apo B for monitoring the efficacy of lipid-altering therapy would likely lead to more stringent criteria for lipid lowering.

Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients stratified by prior statin treatment potency.

OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis compared the lipid-altering efficacy of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg (EZ/Simva) versus Rosuvastatin 10 mg (Rosuva) in patients stratified by statin potency/dose prior to randomization. METHODS: Patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite prior statin treatment (n=618) were randomized 1:1 to EZ/Simva 10/20 mg or Rosuva 10 mg for 6 weeks. Percent change from baseline in lipids and attainment of lipid targets were assessed within each subgroup (low potency n=369, high potency n=249). Consistency of the treatment effect across subgroups was evaluated by testing for treatment-by-subgroup interaction. No multiplicity adjustments were made. RESULTS: Significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction occurred for LDL-C (p=0.013), total cholesterol (p=0.025), non-HDL-C (p=0.032), and apolipoprotein B (p=0.016) with greater between-treatment differences in favor of EZ/Simva observed in patients from the high potency stratum vs low potency stratum. Individual and triple target attainment was higher for Eze/Simva compared with Rosuva in both strata. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Rosuva, switching to EZ/Simva provided greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B and higher target attainment in patients on prior statin treatment, regardless of potency, although patients treated with higher potency statins prior to randomization experienced greater between treatment differences in favor of EZ/Simva. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00479713.

High cardiovascular risk and poor adherence to guidelines in 11,069 patients of middle age and older in primary care centres.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the risk for fatal cardiovascular (CV) disease and adherence to guidelines in ambulatory patients in primary care centres. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of risk factors and 10-year Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk in 11,069 patients aged 50 years or more in primary care. RESULTS: Three-thousand, seven hundred and thirteen (33.5%) patients were actual smokers. Although 61% of the patients were treated with at least one antihypertensive drug, the mean systolic blood pressure was 141±15 mmHg. Of the treated patients, only 15.9% were at goal. Thirty-six percent of the patients were perceived as normocholesterolemic by the primary care physician. In the group of patients, presumed as hypercholesterolemic, the total cholesterol level was 235±38 mg/dl, suggesting that only very high cholesterol level was considered relevant by physicians. Virtually 0% of the patients (n=2) were treated correctly. Obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m) was found in 41% of the patients and central obesity was found in 50% of the patients. Diabetes was present in 2085 (19%) patients and at least one earlier vascular event was present in 2913 (26.3%) patients, with combined pathologies in 388 (4.5%) patients. In the remaining 6766 (61%) patients (neither diabetes nor earlier CV event), the 10-year fatal CV risk according to the Belgian SCORE table was calculated as follows: 716 (10.6%) patients had a risk of less than 2%; 1680 (24.8%) patients had a risk of 2-4%; 2576 (38%) patients had a risk of 5-9% and 1794 (26.6%) patients had a risk of 10% or more. CONCLUSION: Despite simple, clear, credible guidelines, despite the existence of a simple tool such as SCORE risk scoring and despite a very accessible health system in Belgium, the CV risk remains very high even in a professional medical environment of daily primary care practice.

Comparison of the prognostic value of dipyridamole and dobutamine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in hemodialysis patients.

Screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) in hemodialysis patients is hampered by contraindications and/or limitations of the available techniques in this population. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) using dipyridamole has been considered inaccurate due to abnormally high basal levels of adenosine in uremia that could blunt the vasodilatory response. Since dobutamine may be more reliable, we directly compared the two in patients on hemodialysis. We performed MPS at rest and after separate dipyridamole or dobutamine stress in 121 chronic hemodialysis patients. More numerous, larger, and more intense reversible lesions were induced with dobutamine than with dipyridamole, mainly in the anteroseptal segments. Reversibility with dipyridamole but not dobutamine MPS was independently and strongly related with mortality associated with CAD and with fatal and non-fatal CAD. We hypothesize that the chronotropic action of dobutamine induced alterations of wall motion, leading to spurious perfusion defects, not unlike artifacts seen with left bundle branch block. Our study shows that even though dobutamine induced more pronounced myocardial ischemia than dipyridamole in chronic hemodialysis patients, dipyridamole MPS more accurately identifies patients at high risk for subsequent cardiac death or non-fatal CAD than dobutamine.

Comparison of neointimal formation in polymer-free paclitaxel stents versus stainless stents (from the ASPECT and ELUTES randomized clinical trials).

The investigators examined 326 pairs of angiograms from 2 randomized dose-finding (0.2 to 3.1 microg paclitaxel/mm(2) of stent surface area) clinical trials of polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo lesions (the ASian Paclitaxel-Eluting stent Clinical Trial [ASPECT] and the European evaLUation of Taxol Eluting Stent [ELUTES]). A dose-dependent effect was observed: the largest dose of paclitaxel in the 2 trials resulted in a significantly larger proportion of lesions at follow-up with <10% diameter stenosis (54% vs 16%, p = 0.00012 in ASPECT; 53% vs 21%, p = 0.013 in ELUTES) and with minimal luminal diameter located outside the stent compared with control stents (62% vs 20% in ASPECT, 48% vs 18% in ELUTES; p <0.05). Also, significantly shorter lesion lengths at 6-month follow-up were observed for the doses of 0.7 to 3.1 microg/mm(2) (p <0.03) relative to their respective lengths before the procedure compared with control stents.

Short-term effect of atorvastatin on ischaemic threshold in hypercholesterolaemic patients with stable ischaemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Hypercholesterolaemia is associated with a loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which may facilitate the occurrence of myocardial ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The improvement of endothelial dilator function after 4 to 6 weeks of oral lipid-lowering therapy has been documented. Whether this early restoration of endothelial function by statins translates into anti-ischaemic effects is unknown. This study was designed to determine the effect of 4 weeks' treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin daily on exercise-induced ischaemia in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease (IHD) receiving standard anti-anginal drug therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with documented CAD, exercise-induced ischaemia and LDL-cholesterol > 130 mg/dl underwent exercise ECG, angina score and lipid level assessment at baseline, after 4 weeks of placebo treatment, and after 4 weeks of therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg. Primary endpoint was the change in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression (= ischaemic threshold) between placebo and treatment period. Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a 55% reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (from mean of 162 (SD 32) to 72 (20) mg/dl). For a comparable rate-pressure product, the average time to 1 mm ST-segment depression was 295 (112) s at baseline, 314 (149) s after placebo and 301 (131) s after atorvastatin, indicating that the ischaemic threshold was not significantly modulated after 4 weeks of atorvastatin treatment. There was also no significant change in global angina score or in time to maximal ST-segment depression. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose atorvastatin treatment for 4 weeks drastically reduced LDL-cholesterol. However, the present study did not demonstrate a significant effect on the ischaemic threshold in patients with stable IHD already under treatment with anti-ischaemic agents.

Inhibition of restenosis with a paclitaxel-eluting, polymer-free coronary stent: the European evaLUation of pacliTaxel Eluting Stent (ELUTES) trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of a stent to deliver a drug may reduce in-stent restenosis. Paclitaxel interrupts the smooth muscle cell cycle by stabilizing microtubules, thereby arresting mitosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: On the basis of prior animal studies, the European evaLUation of the pacliTaxel Eluting Stent (ELUTES) pilot clinical trial (n=190) investigated the safety and efficacy of V-Flex Plus coronary stents (Cook Inc) coated with escalating doses of paclitaxel (0.2, 0.7, 1.4, and 2.7 microg/mm2 stent surface area) applied directly to the abluminal surface of the stent in de novo lesions compared with bare stent alone. The primary efficacy end point was angiographic percent diameter stenosis at 6 months. At angiographic follow-up, percent diameter stenosis was 33.9+/-26.7% in controls (n=34) and 14.2+/-16.6% in the 2.7-microg/mm2 group (n=31; P=0.006). Late loss decreased from 0.73+/-0.73 to 0.11+/-0.50 mm (P=0.002). Binary restenosis (> or =50% at follow-up) decreased from 20.6% to 3.2% (P=0.056), with no significant benefit from intermediate paclitaxel doses. Freedom from major adverse cardiac events in the highest (effective) dose group was 92%, 89%, and 86% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively (P=NS versus control). No late stent thromboses were seen in any treated group despite clopidogrel treatment for 3 months only. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel applied directly to the abluminal surface of a bare metal coronary stent, at a dose density of 2.7 microg/mm2, reduced angiographic indicators of in-stent restenosis without short- or medium-term side effects.