[Somatic care in psychiatry : barriers perceived by patients and health professionals]. / Soins de santé somatiques en psychiatrie : barrières perçues par les patients et les professionnels de la santé.

Disparities in access to, use of and delivery of somatic health care contribute to widening gaps in morbidity and mortality between psychiatric patients and the general population. We conducted a qualitative semi-structured interview study with psychiatric patients and health professionals from different psychiatric care settings to understand these poor physical health outcomes. Optimal somatic follow-up of patients with severe mental illness seems to be hampered by (1) provider-related elements (attitude, training, experiences); (2) organisational aspects (equipment, infrastructure, staff, pharmacy, communication networks); (3) psychiatric patient-related elements and (4) financial barriers.There is an urgent need for integrated somatic and psychiatric health care systems and for cultural change. Psychiatrists and somatic health care providers continue to view the mental and physical health of their patients as mutually exclusive responsibilities. A range of system changes will improve the quality of somatic health care for these vulnerable patients.

Les disparités dans l'accès, l'utilisation et la prestation des soins de santé somatiques contribuent à creuser les écarts de morbidité et mortalité entre patients psychiatriques et la population générale. Nous avons mené une étude qualitative par entretiens semi-structurés auprès de patients psychiatriques et de professionnels de santé de différents lieux de soins psychiatriques afin de comprendre ces mauvais résultats en matière de santé physique. Le suivi somatique optimal des patients atteints d'une maladie mentale sévère semble entravé par des éléments : (1) liés aux prestataires de soins (attitude, formation, expériences); (2) en relation avec des aspects organisationnels (équipement, infrastructure, personnel, pharmacie, réseaux de communication); (3) inhérents aux caractéristiques des patients psychiatriques et (4) représentés par des obstacles financiers. Il est urgent de mettre en place des systèmes de soins de santé somatiques et psychiatriques intégrés et d'entamer un changement culturel. Les psychiatres et les prestataires de soins somatiques continuent de considérer la santé mentale et la santé physique de leurs patients comme des responsabilités mutuellement exclusives. Un changement de paradigme tendant vers une meilleure intégration permettra d'améliorer la qualité des soins de santé somatiques pour ces patients vulnérables.

[The placebo effects of good communication]. / De placebo-effecten van goede communicatie.

- Good communication is important for patients and can elicit placebo effects: true psychobiological effects not attributable to the medical-technical intervention.- It is, however, often unclear which communication behaviours influence specific patient outcomes.- In this article we present insights into the potential effect of specific communication, via specific mechanisms, on specific patient outcomes, including patients' perception of pain.- A recent systematic review and additional literature demonstrate that (a) manipulating patients' expectations, (b) demonstrating empathy, and (c) providing procedural information, might influence patient outcomes.- These placebo effects probably occur via (a) neurobiological responses comparable to the effects of pain medication, (b) reduction of anxiety and stress, and

The effect of patient-practitioner communication on pain: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Communication between patients and health care practitioners is expected to benefit health outcomes. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of experimentally varied communication on clinical patients' pain. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: We searched in July 2012, 11 databases supplemented with forward and backward searches for (quasi-) randomized controlled trials in which face-to-face communication was manipulated. We updated in June 2015 using the four most relevant databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Psychinfo, PubMed). RESULTS: Fifty-one studies covering 5079 patients were included. The interventions were separated into three categories: cognitive care, emotional care, procedural preparation. In all but five studies the outcome concerned acute pain. We found that, in general, communication has a small effect on (acute) pain. The 19 cognitive care studies showed that a positive suggestion may reduce pain, whereas a negative suggestion may increase pain, but effects are small. The 14 emotional care studies showed no evidence of a direct effect on pain, although four studies showed a tendency for emotional care lowering patients' pain. Some of the 23 procedural preparation interventions showed a weak to moderate effect on lowering pain. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of communication have a significant but small effect on (acute) pain. Positive suggestions and informational preparation seem to lower patients' pain. Communication interventions show a large variety in quality, complexity and methodological rigour; they often used multiple components and it remains unclear what the effective elements of communication are. Future research is warranted to identify the effective components.

Negotiating jurisdiction in the workplace: a multiple-case study of nurse prescribing in hospital settings.

This paper reports on a multiple-case study of prescribing by nurse specialists in Dutch hospital settings. Most analyses of interprofessional negotiations over professional boundaries take a macro sociological approach and ignore workplace jurisdictions. Yet boundary blurring takes place and healthcare professionals renegotiate formal policies in the workplace. This paper studies the division of jurisdictional control over prescribing between nurse specialists and medical specialists in the workplace, and examines the relationship between workplace jurisdiction and legal jurisdiction over prescribing. Data collection took place in the Netherlands during the first half of 2013. The study used in-depth interviews with fifteen nurse specialists and fourteen medical specialists, non-participant observation of nurse specialists' prescribing consultations and document analysis. Great variety was found in the extent to which and way in which nurse specialists' legal prescriptive authority had been implemented. These findings suggest that there is considerable discrepancy between the division of jurisdictional control over prescribing at the macro (legal) level and the division at the micro (workplace) level.

Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home.

BACKGROUND: It is known that many patients encounter a variety of problems in the first weeks after they have been discharged from hospital to home. In recent years many projects have addressed discharge planning, with the aim of reducing problems after discharge. Telephone follow-up (TFU) is seen as a good means of exchanging information, providing health education and advice, managing symptoms, recognising complications early, giving reassurance and providing quality aftercare service. Some research has shown that telephone follow-up is feasible, and that patients appreciate such calls. However, at present it is not clear whether TFU is also effective in reducing postdischarge problems. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of follow-up telephone calls in the first month post discharge, initiated by hospital-based health professionals, to patients discharged from hospital to home. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases from their start date to July 2003, without limits as to date of publication or language: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), PubMed, EMBASE (OVID), BiomedCentral, CINAHL, ERIC (OVID), INVERT (Dutch nursing literature index), LILACS, Picarta (Dutch library system), PsycINFO/PsycLIT (OVID), the Combined Social and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E), SOCIOFILE. We searched for ongoing research in the following databases: National Research Register (http://www.update-software.com/nrr/); Controlled Clinical Trials (http://www.controlled-trials.com/); and Clinical Trials (http://clinicaltrials.gov/). We searched the reference lists of included studies and contacted researchers active in this area. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of TFU initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for patients discharged home from an acute hospital setting. The intervention was delivered within the first month after discharge; outcomes were measured within 3 months after discharge, and either the TFU was the only intervention, or its effect could be analysed separately. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and for methodological quality. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the criteria from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. The data-extraction form was based on the template developed by the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Data was extracted by one review author and checked by a second author. For as far it was considered that there was enough clinical homogeneity with regard to patient groups and measured outcomes, statistical pooling was planned using a random effects model and standardised mean differences for continuous scales and relative risks for dichotomous data, and tests for statistical heterogeneity were performed. MAIN RESULTS: We included 33 studies involving 5110 patients. Predominantly, the studies were of low methodological quality. TFU has been applied in many patient groups. There is a large variety in the ways the TFU was performed (the health professionals who undertook the TFU, frequency, structure, duration, etc.). Many different outcomes have been measured, but only a few were measured across more than one study. Effects are not constant across studies, nor within patient groups. Due to methodological and clinical diversity, quantitative pooling could only be performed for a few outcomes. Of the eight meta-analyses in this review, five showed considerable statistical heterogeneity. Overall, there was inconclusive evidence about the effects of TFU. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The low methodological quality of the included studies means that results must be considered with caution. No adverse effects were reported. Nevertheless, although some studies find that the intervention had favourable effects for some outcomes, overall the studies show clinically-equivalent results between TFU and control groups. In summary, we cannot conclude that TFU is an effective intervention.

Thirst, interdialytic weight gain, and thirst-interventions in hemodialysis patients: a literature review.

A literature search completed over the period of 1980-1999 identified studies on the prevalence of thirst in hemodialysis (HD) patients and the relationship between thirst and interdialytic weight gain, as well as intervention studies in which thirst was used as an outcome variable. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. The prevalence of thirst varied between 6% and 95% across studies. In most studies more thirst was related to more weight gain. However, the studies were difficult to compare due to methodological differences. Three types of interventions were found: technical interventions in the dialysis mechanisms (increasing the frequency of dialysis sessions and varying the concentration of sodium in the dialysate), pharmaceutical interventions (ACE-inhibitors), and a dietetic intervention. Almost no conclusions could be drawn with regard to the effectiveness of these interventions due to methodological differences and weaknesses and due to the small sample sizes.

A randomized trial of a Telephone Reassurance Programme for patients recently discharged from an ophthalmic unit.

Patients often experience problems after discharge, for instance with housekeeping or a general lack of information. The effect of a nurse-initiated Telephone Reassurance Programme (TRP) on ophthalmic patient outcomes was investigated. Patients in the intervention group were phoned by a nurse 3-6 days after being randomized and discharged home. Patients in both intervention and control groups received a questionnaire 1 week and 1 month after discharge to assess the patient outcomes 'Informational needs', 'Uncertainty', 'Emotional complaints' and 'Functional limitations'. In an attempt to explain the lack of statistically significant results, the limitations related to the participants, intervention and outcomes are discussed.

Predictive validity of the BRASS index in screening patients with post-discharge problems. Blaylock Risk Assessment Screening Score.

RATIONALE: Discharge planning is a nursing intervention that aims to ensure continuity of care; it consists of several steps of which selecting patients in need of it is the first one. The Blaylock Risk Assessment Screening Score (BRASS) index is a risk screening instrument which can be used early after admission to identify those patients in need of discharge planning. AIM: To test the predictive validity of the BRASS index in screening patients with post-discharge problems. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal design with prediction instrument measured at admission, and outcomes measured at discharge and 7 and 30 days after discharge. OUTCOME MEASURES: length of stay, discharge destination, status after discharge. INSTRUMENTS: BRASS index, Problems after discharge Questionnaire, Nottingham Health Profile, COOP/WONCA charts. RESEARCH METHOD: 503 elderly patients were screened at admission with the BRASS index. Length of stay and discharge destination were measured at discharge in these same patients. Outcomes after discharge were gathered only in patients who were discharged home and with length of stay of more than 3 days (n=226); outcomes were measured by postal questionnaires at day 7 and day 30 after discharge. RESULTS: patients identified by the BRASS index as high risk are frequently not discharged home and have a longer length of stay. The BRASS scores correlate significantly with the outcome scores after discharge: the higher the BRASS score, the higher the difficulty score after discharge on all domains. However, the sensitivity of the BRASS index is rather low. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the BRASS index is a good predictor instrument for indicating patients who are not discharged home, that the BRASS scores correlate significantly with problems experienced after discharge and that it has high specificity to predict patients with problems after discharge. Clinical use, however, is limited due to the low sensitivity. The BRASS index is a promising case-finding instrument for discharge planning, but needs further development.

The problems of elderly patients at home after ophthalmic treatment.

1. Ophthalmic patients experience problems after discharge. For instance, most patients reported that they felt insufficiently informed, and some wanted additional help with housekeeping. 2. The most important informational needs are related to the expected recovery time and what the normal recovery signs are. Concerning housekeeping, patients experience most problems with household tasks involving heavy lifting and with shopping. 3. Nurses should address these problems and adapt their practices. For instance, nurses can mail a leaflet containing relevant information to patients before admission, or can institute a post-discharge telephone program to resolve problems.

The problems of elderly people at home one week after discharge from an acute care setting.

The problems of elderly people following discharge from hospital is a worldwide focus of nursing attention. Actual and local insight into the nature and extent of post-discharge problems is needed as a base for improving and evaluating discharge planning. Problems following discharge were investigated as the first part of a larger study. Over a 3-month period, 251 elderly people who had been discharged after a hospital stay of more than 3 days, were asked to participate in the study. Half received a postal questionnaire and half were interviewed at home, one week after discharge. There were 145 respondents. The need for information was mentioned by 80% of the patients. Housekeeping tasks also caused most patients some difficulty. Almost 40% of those discharged reported some kind of unmet need.

Home visits by community nurses for cancer patients after discharge from hospital: an evaluation study of the continuity visit.

After discharge from the hospital, patients with cancer can have several problems at home. In this project, patients with cancer, who at time of discharge from the hospital were not indicated for nursing care at home, were offered three home visits by a community nurse. A prospective, descriptive study was undertaken to assess indicators of usefulness of these "continuity visits." It was registered how many and what patients [sex, age, (time of) diagnosis, social support, therapy] wanted to receive the visit. Care needs, as mentioned by the patients during the continuity visits, were reported after the visit by the community nurse. Both patients and community nurses completed an evaluation form after the first visit. A continuity visit was offered to 337 patients; 112 patients received a first, 50 a second, and 24 a third continuity visit. Older patients, patients without social support, and those diagnosed less than half a year before more often agreed to received a first visit. Reasons for patients not receiving a second or third visit were either that patients did not want one or on the contrary they were in need of immediate nursing care or had died before the visit. Two weeks after discharge, 93% of the patients experienced one or more physical, psychological, or social problems; 70% mentioned a need for information; and 47% needed emotional support. Both patients and community nurses evaluate the first visit positively. The findings suggest that continuation of the offer of the first continuity visit could be useful.