Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 30(6): 745-754, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36349508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The necessity of a specific T classification for extrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) type 2, one of the precursors of cholangiocarcinoma (CC), remains unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection for extrahepatic biliary tumors were reviewed. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared between IPNB type 2 and CC, stratified by T classification. RESULTS: The cohort involved 443 patients with IPNB type 2 (n = 57) and CC (n = 386). In 342 patients with perihilar tumors, 5-year RFS of IPNB type 2 and CC group was 49.8% versus 34.5% (p = .012), respectively. The RFS was 54.6% versus 47.2% (p = .110) for pT1-2 tumors and 28.6% versus 22.7% (p = .436) for pT3-4 tumors, respectively. In 92 patients with distal tumors, 5-year RFS was 47.4% versus 42.1% (p = .678). The RFS was 68.2% versus 49.6% (p = .422) for pT1 tumors and 18.8% versus 38.3% (p = .626) for pT2-3 tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that poor histologic grade (HR, 2.105; p < .001), microscopic venous invasion (HR, 1.568; p = .002), and nodal metastasis (HR, 1.547; p < .001) were independent prognostic deteriorators, while tumor type (IPNB type 2 vs. CC) was not. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic impact of IPNB type 2 was limited, suggesting unnecessity of a specific T classification for IPNB type 2 with invasive carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Humans , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Prognosis , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...