Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(5): 511-518, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895576

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellows' views of self-preparedness upon starting postresidency training. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national survey of first-year NPM fellows in the United States. The validated survey had five major areas: professionalism, psychomotor ability, independence/graduated responsibility, clinical evaluation, and academia. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the free-text answers were categorized. RESULTS: Of 228 potential first-year NPM fellows, 140 (61%) initially responded to the survey. Overall, the fellows perceived themselves positively in professionalism and independence/graduated responsibility domains. Marked variability was observed in perceived preparedness in psychomotor ability, with confidence in neonatal intubation and arterial line placement of 86 and 49%, respectively. Lack of confidence in performing neonatal intubation procedures correlates with lack of attempts. The majority (75%) of fellows reported being interested in academia, but less than half felt capable of writing an article. CONCLUSION: First-year NPM fellows identified deficiencies in the domains of psychomotor ability and academia. Residency and fellowship programs should partner to address these deficiencies.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internship and Residency , Neonatology/education , Perinatology/education , Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Congenit Heart Dis ; 14(1): 95-99, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811795

ABSTRACT

The optimal treatment method for infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) necessitating closure remains a subject of controversy and debate. While the risks associated with surgical PDA ligation are well described, the available evidence base for alternative management strategies during infancy, including percutaneous closure or conservative (nonintervention) management, are not well explored. Among infants, the goals of this review are to: (a) use rigorous systematic review methodology to assess the quality and quantity of published reports on percutaneous closure vs surgical ligation; (b) compare outcomes of percutaneous closure vs conservative management; and (c) based on recommendations from the International PDA symposium, to elucidate needs and opportunities for future research and interdisciplinary collaboration. The available evidence base, as well as on broad consensus reached at the International PDA Symposium, suggests that a contemporary, pragmatic clinical trial comparing PDA treatment strategies is warranted. Additionally, quality assurance safeguards are necessary in the implementation of newer PDA closure devices. Finally, to determine best approaches to treatment for infants with PDA, tools for consistent data collection and reporting across centers and disciplines are needed to minimize heterogeneity and permit pooled analysis.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/trends , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Quality Improvement , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Infant, Newborn
3.
J Perinatol ; 39(1): 39-47, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353079

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes at two institutions with different approaches to care among infants born at 22 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study (2006-2015). Enrollment was limited to mother-infant dyads at 22 weeks of gestation. Proactive care was defined as provision of antenatal corticosteroids and neonatal resuscitation and intensive care. One center (Uppsala, Sweden; UUCH) provided proactive care to all mother-infant dyads (comprehensive center); the other center (Nationwide Children's Hospital, USA; NCH) initiated or withheld treatment based on physician and family preferences (selective center). Differences in outcomes between the two centers were evaluated. RESULT: Among 112 live-born infants at 22 weeks of gestation, those treated at UUCH had in-hospital survival rates higher than those at NCH (21/40, 53% vs. 6/72, 8%; P < 0.01). Among the subgroup of infants receiving proactive care (UUCH: 40/40, 100%; NCH: 16/72, 22%) survival was higher at UUCH than at NCH (21/40, 53% vs. 3/16, 19%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Even when mother-infant dyads were provided proactive care at NCH (selective center), survival was lower than infants provided proactive care at UUCH (comprehensive center). Differences between the approaches to care at the two centers at 22 weeks of gestation merits further investigation.


Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Prenatal Care , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/etiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/mortality , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Intensive Care, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Sweden/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...