From symptom onset to a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease (ALS/MND): experiences of people with ALS/MND and family carers - a qualitative study.

Our objectives were to explore the personal perspectives of the diagnostic experience for people with ALS/MND and their family carers identifying issues that could impact positively or negatively on these experiences. We conducted a qualitative study with face-to-face interviews to capture experiences from 24 people with ALS/MND and 18 current family carers. Ten former family carers were also interviewed. The diagnostic experience was fraught with difficulties. There was failure to recognize the significance of some symptoms by patients, carers and primary and secondary care health professionals, which ultimately delayed diagnosis. Delivery of the diagnosis was frequently unsatisfactory despite international guidelines on the subject. Immediate post-diagnosis support often compared negatively to that provided for people with cancer. In conclusion, this study has identified a need for a more streamlined and empathetic diagnostic pathway for people with ALS/MND. Improvements to medical curricula are required to increase awareness of the condition and reduce the likelihood of diagnostic delays resulting from a failure to recognize the need for a neurological referral. Greater public awareness of the illness is also needed. Furthermore, delivery of the diagnosis should more closely adhere to established guidelines.

Timelines in the diagnostic evaluation of people with suspected amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND)--a 20-year review: can we do better?

This paper examines diagnostic timelines for people suspected of having ALS/MND over a 20-year period, evaluates the impact of a 'fast track' diagnostic process and discusses typical causes of diagnostic delay. Key diagnostic timelines (dates of first symptom, diagnosis and death) were reviewed for people diagnosed between 1989 and 2008. Patients evaluated through a fast-track diagnostic process and those investigated through traditional neurology clinics were compared. Typical causes of diagnostic delay were investigated. Results showed that diagnostic timelines have been surprisingly consistent over this 20-year period. Time from first symptom to diagnosis hovered around 12 months, with the diagnosis typically being made around the midpoint (50% of total disease duration elapsed) of the disease pathway. The introduction of a fast-track process has not to date affected overall performance but has shortened times from referral to diagnosis. Diagnostic delays appear to be associated with clinical complexity and delays in referral, both within primary and secondary care services. In conclusion, more widespread implementation of fast-track processes could potentially reduce diagnostic delays. Educational interventions among health care professionals both in primary and secondary care may also help shorten diagnostic pathways.