Injury and performance related biomechanical differences between recreational and collegiate runners.

Introduction: Running related injuries (RRI) are common, but factors contributing to running performance and RRIs are not commonly compared between different types of runners. Methods: We compared running biomechanics previously linked to RRIs and performance between 27 recreational and 35 collegiate runners. Participants completed 5 overground running trials with their dominant limb striking a force plate, while outfitted with standardised footwear and 3-dimensional motion capture markers. Results: Post hoc comparisons revealed recreational runners had a larger vertical loading rate (194.5 vs. 111.5 BW/s, p < 0.001) and shank angle (6.80 vs. 2.09, p < 0.001) compared with the collegiate runners who demonstrated greater vertical impulse (0.349 vs. 0.233 BWs, p < 0.001), negative impulse (-0.022 vs. -0.013 BWs, p < 0.001), positive impulse (0.024 vs. 0.014 BWs, p < 0.001), and propulsive force (0.390 vs. 0.333 BW, p = 0.002). Adjusted for speed, collegiate runners demonstrated greater total support moment (TSM), plantar flexor moment, knee extensor moment, hip extensor moment, and had greater proportional plantar flexor moment contribution and less knee extensor moment contribution to the TSM compared with recreational runners. Unadjusted for speed, collegiate runners compared with recreational had greater TSM and plantar flexor moment but similar joint contributions to the TSM. Discussion: Greater ankle joint contribution may be more efficient and allow for greater capacity to increase speed. Improving plantarflexor function during running provides a strategy to improve running speed among recreational runners. Moreover, differences in joint kinetics and ground reaction force characteristics suggests that recreational and collegiate runners may experience different types of RRI.

Running kinetics and femoral trochlea cartilage characteristics in recreational and collegiate distance runners.

Recreational running can benefit knee cartilage, but the relationship between competitive running and knee cartilage is unclear. We compared femoral cartilage between collegiate runners, recreational runners, and controls; and evaluated the association between running amount, running kinetics and femoral cartilage characteristics. Thirty collegiate runners, 30 recreational runners, and 30 controls completed ultrasound imaging of the femoral cartilage and running gait analysis. Outcomes included cartilage thickness, and echo-intensity from the medial and lateral femoral condyles; and the peak external knee flexion (KFM) and knee adduction moments. Cartilage outcomes were compared via one-way MANOVA. The associations between running kinetics, running amount, and femoral cartilage characteristics were assessed via linear regression models adjusted for sex. No differences were found in cartilage outcomes between groups (p = 0.067). Among recreational runners, a larger peak KFM was associated with lower medial femoral cartilage echo-intensity (ΔR2 = 0.176, Δp = 0.014). In collegiate runners, a greater self-reported running amount was associated with higher medial femoral cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.117, Δp = 0.046) and lateral cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.121, Δp = 0.042) echo-intensity. Cartilage did not differ between groups, but the association between running kinetics, running amount, and knee cartilage may vary between collegiate and recreational runners.