Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (10): 77-81, 2017.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29076487

ABSTRACT

Accurate mapping of colorectal neoplasms is needed in many clinical situations. Intraoperative mapping of small lesions previously detected by endoscopy is often challenging, especially during laparoscopic surgery. Tumor location assessed during colonoscopy may be inaccurate because of limitations of the procedure. Small flat neoplasms with signs of invasiveness, which are hard to detect by palpation, hold a special place. The same situation is observed for nonradical endoscopic resection of malignant polyps or early cancer, when visual examination shows that the tumor masses have been completely resected but histological examination reveals the positive lateral or horizontal resection margin. Endoscopic tattooing is an effective, safe, and economically sound method to mark intraluminal colorectal neoplasms, which allows one to perform minimally invasive surgeries without using additional operating room resources.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Laparoscopy , Tattooing/methods , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Coloring Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual/prevention & control , Reproducibility of Results , Tumor Burden
2.
EBioMedicine ; 9: 140-147, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27333048

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In many countries, gastric cancer is not diagnosed until an advanced stage. An Internet-based e-learning system to improve the ability of endoscopists to diagnose gastric cancer at an early stage was developed and was evaluated for its effectiveness. METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. After receiving a pre-test, participants were randomly allocated to either an e-learning or non-e-learning group. Only those in the e-learning group gained access to the e-learning system. Two months after the pre-test, both groups received a post-test. The primary endpoint was the difference between the two groups regarding the rate of improvement of their test results. FINDINGS: 515 endoscopists from 35 countries were assessed for eligibility, and 332 were enrolled in the study, with 166 allocated to each group. Of these, 151 participants in the e-learning group and 144 in the non-e-learning group were included in the analysis. The mean improvement rate (standard deviation) in the e-learning and non-e-learning groups was 1·24 (0·26) and 1·00 (0·16), respectively (P<0·001). INTERPRETATION: This global study clearly demonstrated the efficacy of an e-learning system to expand knowledge and provide invaluable experience regarding the endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer (R000012039).


Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists/education , Program Development , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Gastroenterologists/psychology , Gastroscopy , Humans , Internet , Learning , Program Evaluation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...