Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison between recent users and nonusers of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To determine clinical, endoscopic, and outcome differences between recent users and nonusers of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 330 consecutive patients who presented with clinical manifestations of UGIB underwent urgent endoscopy after clinical assessment within 12 h of admission. The patients were divided into two groups, depending on whether there was a positive or negative history of recent NSAID use. Urgent endoscopy followed by endoscopic hemostasis and/or biopsy, as needed, was performed by the same endoscopist, who was blinded to the patients' clinical status. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics, clinically estimated severity of UGIB, and outcome did not differ between the two groups. Recent NSAID users were found to bleed from an ulcer more frequently (P=0.009) than nonusers of NSAIDs, the latter more often having a history of peptic ulcer or UGIB (P=0.02). Bleeding ulcers were mostly duodenal in the NSAID group and gastric in the non-NSAID group (P<0.001). Helicobacter pylori infection was significantly more common among NSAID users (P<0.01). The group of NSAID users included a significantly greater proportion of alcohol abusers (P=0.01), who were found to bleed mostly from erosive gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: Recent NSAID users were found to bleed from ulcers, mostly duodenal, and to have H. pylori infection more frequently than UGI bleeders with a negative history of NSAID consumption. Alcohol abuse was also more common among NSAID users. The severity of bleeding and the outcome did not differ between the two groups.

A new classification tool for clinical differentiation between haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke.

PURPOSE: To develop a simple and reliable diagnostic tool for differentiation of cerebral infarction (CIF) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in order to aid clinicians to decide about starting antiplatelet therapy in settings where rapid access to computed tomography (CT) is lacking. METHODS: Thirty variables regarding each patient admitted with acute stroke were recorded and considered in a logistic regression analysis using ICH as end-point (internal study). CT was used as the golden standard. The score derived was validated with data from the next consecutive stroke patients and was compared with the three preexisting scores (external validation study). RESULTS: Amongst 235 patients (119 males, mean age 70.6 +/- 11.2 years) of the internal study, 43 (18.3%) had ICH. Four independent correlates of ICH were identified and used for the derivation of the following integer-based scoring system: number of points=6 * (neurological deterioration within 3 h from admission) + 4 * (vomiting) + 4 * (WBC > 12 000) + 3 * (decreased level of consciousness). In the external study [168 patients, 85 males, mean age 70.2 +/- 10.8 years, 31 (18.5%) with ICH], when the cut-offs < or =3 points for CIF and > or =11 points for ICH were used, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the score for detection of stroke type were 97, 99, 97 and 99%, respectively; exceeding noticeably the three previously proposed systems. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model provides an easy to use tool for sufficiently accurate differentiation between haemorrhagic and nonhaemorrhagic stroke on the basis of information available to all physicians early after admission.