VAD-doxil versus VAD-doxil plus thalidomide as initial treatment for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized trial of the Greek Myeloma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD-doxil) is equally effective with VAD-bolus yielding objective response rates of 61% as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). In a phase II study, the addition of thalidomide to VAD-doxil (TVAD-doxil) proved feasible and increased response rate to 74%. The aim of the present multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of VAD-doxil and TVAD-doxil in previously untreated MM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 232 newly diagnosed MM patients aged <75 years, 115 randomized to VAD-doxil (arm A) and 117 to TVAD-doxil (arm B). Patients in arm A received vincristine 2 mg i.v. and liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) i.v., on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily on days 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20 for the first cycle and on days 1-4 for the next three cycles. Patients in arm B received additionally thalidomide 200 mg p.o. daily, at bedtime. Treatment was administered every 28 days. RESULTS: On an intention-to-treat basis, at least partial response was observed, in 62.6% and in 81.2% of patients randomized to arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was 44.8% in arm A and 58.9% in arm B (P = 0.013). Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 64.6% and 77%, in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.037). Considering overall toxicity, constipation, peripheral neuropathy, dizziness/somnolence, skin rash and edema were significantly higher in arm B compared with arm A (P < 0.01), but grade 3-4 toxicities were low and similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of thalidomide to VAD-doxil increases response and PFS rates and probably OS in previously untreated myeloma patients. The superiority of efficacy counterbalances the higher overall toxicity of TVAD-doxil.

Treatment of early clinically staged Hodgkin's disease with a combination of ABVD chemotherapy plus limited field radiotherapy.

The current management of early stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) is usually based on clinical staging, combined modality therapy and the use of less toxic chemotherapy regimens. This approach entails high cure rates, while ensures less long term toxicity with avoidance of laparotomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a brief course of Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy followed by limited field radiotherapy (RT) in favorable clinical stage (CS) I and IIA HD. Forty patients, aged 17-68 (median 34) years, with favorable CS I and IIA HD, without bulky mediastinal disease, have been treated with 4-6 (median 4) cycles of ABVD plus limited field RT. Twenty seven (67%) patients received 4 cycles of chemotherapy, while 13 received 5-6 cycles. Thirty five (87%) patients received limited field RT with dose 24-36 Gy and five (13%) received extended field with 36-46 Gy. All patients responded completely to chemotherapy. One patient experienced a relapse two months after the end of therapy. All patients are alive; 39 in continuous complete remission. With a median follow-up period of 44 months (range 18-101) the actuarial overall and progress free survival was 100 and 97% at 5 years. We did not observe any case of secondary leukemia or solid tumor. Pulmonary toxicity was mild in cases of mediastinal irradiation. Considering the short follow-up time and the small number of patients, the combination of a brief course of ABVD plus regional RT is a very efficacious treatment of favorable CS I and IIA HD with mild toxicity. However, long term survival data are needed, which could give confident answers regarding the risk of late therapy related complications, particularly second malignancies.

Survival and prognostic factors after initiation of treatment in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia.

BACKGROUND: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an unusual lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma characterized by the presence of a serum monoclonal immunoglobulin M. Although several studies have evaluated possible prognostic factors of this disease, few have focused on the survival and prognosis of symptomatic patients after the initiation of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 122 previously untreated patients with a median age of 67 years who required systemic treatment. Multiple variables were analyzed for their prognostic value on survival after initiation of treatment using univariate and Cox regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 106 months. Pretreatment factors associated with shorter survival were age >/=65 years, splenomegaly, B-symptoms (weight loss, fever or night sweats), hemoglobin <10 g/dl, platelets <100 x 10(6)/dl, albumin <3.5 g/dl and bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate >/=50%. In the multivariate analysis, the two variables with independent prognostic value were age >/=65 years and hemoglobin <10 g/dl. Furthermore, we were able to divide our patients into three risk groups based on the presence of two, one or none of these two adverse prognostic factors. The median survival times in the high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups were 46 months, 107 months and 172 months, respectively (P <0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that advanced age and anemia appear to be the two dominant prognostic factors for survival after initiation of treatment in patients with WM. These two readily available parameters can stratify the patients into three distinct subgroups and may help the selection of appropriate treatment.

Prospective randomized comparison of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as intravenous bolus injection and VAD with liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The combination of vincristine and doxorubicin administered as a continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter together with intermittent high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) is an effective primary treatment for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. In order to avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, which imposes logistic problems for outpatient administration, several phase II studies have explored the feasibility and efficacy of VAD-like outpatient regimens. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare the objective response rates of two VAD-like outpatient regimens as primary treatment for symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were entered in a randomized study regardless of age, performance status and renal function. One hundred and twenty-seven patients received VAD bolus, which consisted of vincristine 0.4 mg i.v., doxorubicin 9 mg/m(2) i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for four consecutive days and 132 patients received VAD doxil, which consisted of vincristine 2 mg i.v. and liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for 4 days. The two regimens were administered every 28 days for four courses and in courses 1 and 3, in both arms, dexamethasone was also given on days 9-12 and 17-20. RESULTS: An objective response was documented in 61.4% and 61.3% of patients treated with VAD bolus and VAD doxil, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild or moderate and equally distributed between the two treatment arms with the exception of alopecia, which was more common after VAD bolus, and of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, which was more common after VAD doxil. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter trial, which included an unselected patient population, indicated that both VAD bolus and VAD doxil can be administered to outpatients and can provide an equal opportunity of rapid response in many patients with multiple myeloma.

Maintenance therapy with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) versus IFN-alpha plus chemotherapy in multiple myeloma (MM). The Greek Myeloma Study Group.

Results of studies using IFN-alpha treatment for maintaining remission and prolonging survival in multiple myeloma (MM) are in conflict and trials seeking optimum use for this biological response modifier are continuing. Between 1989 and 1993 a prospective randomized multicentre trial was undertaken to evaluate the role of the combination of IFN-alpha with chemotherapy (CT) in maintenance treatment of MM. For remission induction, in patients 65 yr or younger, we used VAD (group A) and for the remaining Melphalan and Prednisone (MP) (group B). For maintenance, patients were randomized to receive IFN-alpha 3 x 10(6) i.u. s.c. t.i.w. (group I) or alternating monthly cycles of IFN-alpha and CT. The CT cycles were also alternated (VAD, MP, CP) in an effort to prevent the development of multidrug resistance. Median survival of the two maintenance groups from randomization (36 months for group I and 31 months for group II, p = 0.3) as well as response duration (13 months in group I and 15 months in group II, p = 0.95) were similar. Toxicities were more pronounced both with VAD induction and in the combination maintenance arm. The addition of chemotherapy to the IFN maintenance regimen in MM did not have an advantage over IFN alone.

High frequency of HLA-DR5 in Greek patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B.

Sixty unrelated Greek patients with haemophilia (46 with haemophilia A and 14 with haemophilia B) were typed for HLA-A, B and DR antigens. A highly significant increase in the frequency of HLA-DR5 was observed in both groups of patients (58.6% vs 30.0%, chi 2 = 10.47, pc less than 0.03, RR = 3.31 for haemophilia A and 78.5% vs 30.0%, chi 2 = 12.32, pc less than 0.007, RR = 8.5 for haemophilia B). An increased frequency of HLA-B13 was also observed in patients with haemophilia A (15.2% vs 5.7%, chi 2 = 5.74, pc less than 0.4, RR = 2.9). Thirty of the 60 patients (50.0%) were positive for LAV/HTLVIII antibodies. HLA-DR5 was equally distributed in patients with and without these antibodies (63.3% and 63.3%, respectively). The presence of DR5 did not correlate with the severity of haemophilia A or B. These results may suggest an influence of gene(s) on chromosome 6 in haemophilia A and haemophilia B and no effect of HLA antigens in the susceptibility to LAV/ HTLVIII infection among haemophiliac patients.