[Comparison of the effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and cost-effectiveness between cefazolin (CEZ) and Sulbactam/Ampicillin (SBT/ABPC) in gastric cancer surgery employing clinical pathway].

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin (CEZ) and Sulbactam/Ampicillin (SBT/ABPC) in gastric cancer surgery employing clinical pathway. 157 patients (62 in the CEZ group and 95 in the SBT/ABPC group), who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at the First Department of Surgery of our hospital, were investigated. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to sex, age, incidence of complication, stage of cancer, surgical method, operative time and blood loss, length of hospitalization, the appearance of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), changes body temperature, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), or clinical outcome of postoperative care by a nurse during post-operation for 7 days. The prophylactic effect of infection was also no different between the CEZ (69.4%) and SBT/ABPC (69.5%) groups. In contrast, decision analysis strongly indicated that the anticipate cost of antibiotics was higher in the latter group (yen 20402) than in the CEZ group (yen 15556), suggesting that the prophylactic effect of CEZ may be more cost-effective. Thus, evaluations of pharmacotherapy from the aspect of cost may be one of the important responsibility of hospital pharmacists in the future.

[Clinical significance of a standardized clinical pathway in gastrectomy patients].

UNLABELLED: In traditional practice patterns, physicians take care of all clinical decisions, such as diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. In the Nippon Medical School Hospital a clinical pathway for distal gastrectomy patients, recorded as a post-operative care map, was introduced in August 2000. In January 2001 the post-operative management was analyzed and standardization of practice was carried out with printed order sets, such as drugs and infusion solutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the clinical pathway for gastrectomy patients by employing standardized postoperative management and printed order sets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2001, 87 patients underwent distal (43), total (28), proximal (7) and partial gastrectomy (9) for gastric cancer (stage IA: 47, IB: 9, II: 7, IIIA: 8, IIIB 2, IV: 10) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (4). These patients were randomly assigned to either the main building or the east building of our hospital. In the main building 38 patients were looked after using traditional practice (control group). In the east building 47 patients were looked after according to the clinical pathway (path group) and 2 patients were excluded from the path group because of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and severe heart failure. Aspects of the patients' outcomes, including length of stay, the first day of the diet, morbidity, and medical costs, were compared between the path group and the control group. All data were expressed as means+/-standard deviation. Statistical analyses were made using Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and chi(2) test, and the 5%level was chosen for statistical significance. RESULTS: The length of the hospital stay was 27.1+/-10.0 and 40.8+/-26.1 days (p<0.005) and the length of post-operative stay was 18.1+/-9.5 and 28.2+/-22.3 days (p<0.01) in the path group and the control group, respectively. The post-operative day when the diet was started for the path and control groups was 6.8+/-8.9 and 8.2+/-7.2, respectively; however, the length of the intravenous infusion for the two groups was 11.8+/-1.1 and 16.5+/-1.2 days (p<0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the morbidity rate between the path group (3/47) and the control group (5/38). The total cost was 1,502,587 yen +/-41,650 in the path group and 1,932,197 yen +/-131,030 in the control (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A clinical pathway for gastrectomy patients proved useful to optimize their postoperative care, including medication management and diet education. It is suggested that the implementation of a standardized clinical pathway for gastrectomy patients reduced the length of the hospital stay and the medical costs.

[Pharmacoeconomical evaluation of clinical pathway in gastrectomy patients].

The aim of the present study was to ascertain the pharmacoeconomical efficacy of a clinical pathway (CP) employing medication management and instruction tasks (i. e. pharmaceutical care and counseling for inpatients) in gastrectomy patients. Pharmaceutical services of a uniform quality were provided. These included a CP check sheet, medication management, and a history of the drugs chiefly prescribed by pharmacists. As a result, the average number of hospitalized days among the patients who were offered pharmaceutical care compared with those who were not was significantly shortened from 35.4 days to 26.1 days (P<0.001). Moreover, the average cost of medication was also significantly reduced from 270,631 yen to 190,331 yen (P<0.05). These data provide the first evidence that a CP employing medication management and instruction tasks for gastrectomy patients may play a substantial role in saving on medical costs.