Is Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Safe and Effective after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has emerged as an alternative option for biliary drainage in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS. In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we aim to study the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS in cases of failed conventional ERCP. Methods: Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched to include all studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS. Using the random effect model, the pooled weight-adjusted event rate estimate for clinical outcomes in each group were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success rates. Secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (AEs), rates of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and rates or re-intervention. Results: Our analysis included 70 studies, with a total of 3527 patients. The pooled technical and clinical success rates for EUS-HGS were 98.1% ([95% CI, 97.5-98.7]; I2 = 40%) and 98.1% ([95% CI, 97.5-98.7]; I2 = 40%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of AEs with EUS-HGS was 14.9% (95% CI, 12.7-17.1), with bile leakage being the most common (2.4% [95% CI, 1.7-3.2]). The pooled incidence of RBO was 15.8% [95% CI, 12.2-19.4], with a high success rate for re-intervention (97.5% [95% CI, 94.7-100]). Conclusions: Our analysis showed high technical and clinical success rates of EUS-HGS, making it a feasible and effective alternative to ERCP. The ongoing development of dedicated devices and techniques is expected to make EUS-HGS more accessible and safer for patients in need of biliary drainage.

Acute Esophageal Necrosis or Black Esophagus in the Setting of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) or black esophagus is a rare cause of mortality in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. We present a case of a 54-year-old female who presented with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and developed melena eventually attributed to AEN. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) identified severe inflammation with black discoloration consistent with acute esophageal necrosis in the middle and lower esophagus. The patient was managed with intravenous pantoprazole and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) until she was able to tolerate an adequate diet. Black esophagus should be added to the differential diagnosis of patients with DKA who develop gastrointestinal bleeding. This need is stressed by the fact that early treatment is essential to reducing complications and mortality associated with the condition.

An in-depth review of retrospective studies to assess the role of vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of complex patients with multiple risk factors for DES-ISR.

BACKGROUND: Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) used to be an effective treatment modality for management of in-stent stenosis but was superceded by drug eluting stents (DES) which had shown a greater efficacy. However, there is no clear evidence to support superior management for in-stent restenosis (ISR) which continues to be a challenge. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature and appraised PubMed, Medline, Web of science, ProQuest and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2020. We assessed comparative outcomes including efficacy (as assessed by measuring major adverse cardiac events, target vessel revascularisation, target lesion revascularisation, all-cause mortality, target lesion myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis) and safety of VBT. RESULTS: Of 1083 records obtained, a total of 8 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. In the included studies, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates ranged from 10% to 17.5% in the VBT group compared to 14.1% to 28.2% in the re-DES group at one year follow up. There were lower rates of target vessel revascularisation (VBT 10-22.8%; control 18-22.9%) and target lesion revascularisation (VBT 10-14.1%, Control 8-22.1%) between the VBT and re-DES groups. There were significantly low rates of all-cause mortality (1-5.4%), target lesion myocardial infarction (0-7%) and stent thrombosis (0-2.1%) in the VBT group at one year. CONCLUSIONS: VBT is considered to be an effective and safe treatment strategy in complex patients with multiple risk factors for DES-ISR in initial reports. There are no long-term comparison studies available beyond 1 year. There is a need for randomised controlled trials to objectively assess the role of VBT compared to DES and drug coated balloons.

Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc and One Shape File Systems Using CBCT-An In Vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: Root canal preparation leads to deviation of the canal anatomy causing canal transportation which affects the success of the treatment. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a non invasive imaging technique to analyse the shape of the root canal before and after the preparation. AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate the canal transportation in curved mandibular molar root canals and centering ability of Reciproc and One Shape file systems after instrumentation using CBCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty mandibular molars were taken and allocated into two groups (n=10): Group 1-One Shape and Group 2-Reciproc. The canals were then scanned using CS 3D CBCT scanner (Carestream) before and after preparation, to assess the transportation and centering values at different levels respectively from the apex. The data gathered were then assessed statistically with Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that Reciproc and One Shape showed statistically no significant difference in terms of canal transportation and centering ability (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: One shape and Reciproc performed similar in terms of canal transportation & centering ability.