Bleeding events in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: prevalence, severity, and associated damage accrual.

Background: Life-long anticoagulation increases bleeding risk in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome does not include bleeding events in damage accrual. Objectives: We aimed to characterize the prevalence, severity, and damage associated with bleeding events in patients with APS. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with thrombotic APS (2006 Sydney criteria). Bleeding events were reviewed up to 43 years and classified according to the ISTH definitions into 2 groups: 1) major bleedings and 2) nonmajor bleedings (minor bleedings and clinically relevant nonmajor bleedings). Damage events were recorded as bleeding events a) resulting in permanent (>6 months) decrease in organ function and b) complicated by total/partial organ resection. Results: Among 197 patients (2412 patient-years [PYs] of follow-up), all of whom had been exposed to antithrombotic therapy, 40.6% experienced 167 bleedings (6.9 events per 100 PYs), of whom 61.3% had nonmajor bleedings (77.2% of bleedings: 42.6% minor, 57.4% clinically relevant nonmajor) and 38.8% had major bleedings (22.8% of bleedings; 1.6 events per 100 PYs). Soft/connective tissue was affected in 44.3% of bleedings, and 94.6% were nonmajor bleedings. Central nervous system was affected in 20.9% of bleedings, and 62.9% were major bleedings. Bleeding events were spontaneous in 90.4% of cases, and thrombocytopenia was likely involved in 62.2% of bleedings. Damage occurred in 11.4% of bleedings and affected 7.6% of patients. Most of the damage was associated with central nervous system events (8.4% of all bleedings). Conclusion: Approximately 40% of patients experienced at least 1 bleeding, and almost 8% of patients were left with organ damage not recognized by the current version of the Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Platelets and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL): lupus anticoagulant and/or IgG/IgM anti-ß2-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies. APS carries significant morbidity for a relatively young patient population from recurrent thrombosis in any vascular bed (arterial, venous, or microvascular), often despite current standard of care, which is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Platelets have established roles in thrombosis at any site, and platelet hyperreactivity is clearly demonstrated in the pathophysiology of APS. Together with excess thrombin generation, platelet activation and aggregation are the common end result of all the pathophysiological pathways leading to thrombosis in APS. However, antiplatelet therapies play little role in APS, reserved as a possible option of low dose aspirin in addition to VKA in arterial or refractory thrombosis. This review outlines the current evidence and mechanisms for excessive platelet activation in APS, how it plays a central role in APS-related thrombosis, what evidence for antiplatelets is available in clinical outcomes studies, and potential future avenues to define how to target platelet hyperreactivity better with minimal impact on haemostasis.

Survey on antiphospholipid syndrome diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment in patients with ischemic stroke, other brain ischemic injury, or arterial thromboembolism in other sites: communication from ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated acute ischemic stroke (AIS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or other brain ischemic injury is poorly defined. OBJECTIVES: The survey goal was to capture variations in diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment of APS-associated ischemic stroke and related disorders to inform guidance and clinical trials to define optimal management. METHODS: Professional colleagues, including key opinion leaders, were invited to complete a REDCap survey questionnaire initiated by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies. The survey data were tallied using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was generally good agreement on several aspects, including which patients to test for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), use of a lifelong vitamin K antagonist for AIS or recurrent TIA, and formal cognitive assessment for suspected cognitive impairment. There was less agreement on other aspects, including aPL testing for brain ischemic injury other than AIS/TIA or if an alternative cause for AIS or TIA exists; choice of aPL tests, their timing, and age cutoff; the aPL phenotype to trigger antithrombotic treatment; management for patent foramen ovale; antithrombotic treatment for first TIA or white matter hyperintensities; head magnetic resonance imaging specifications; and low-molecular-weight heparin dosing/anti-Xa monitoring in pregnancy. The survey highlighted that approximately 25% practice at dedicated APS clinics and <50% have a multidisciplinary team structure for patients with APS. CONCLUSION: Much of the variation in practice reflects the lack of evidence-based recommendations. The survey results should inform the development of a more uniform multidisciplinary consensus approach to diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment.

Antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, and stroke.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prothrombotic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinicopathological manifestations and is a well-established cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), particularly in younger patients. There is growing recognition of a wider spectrum of APS-associated cerebrovascular lesions, including white matter hyperintensities, cortical atrophy, and infarcts, which may have clinically important neurocognitive sequalae. Diagnosis of APS-associated AIS/TIA requires expert review of clinical and laboratory information. Management poses challenges, given the potential for substantial morbidity and recurrent thrombosis, additional risk conferred by conventional cardiovascular risk factors, and limited evidence base regarding optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention. In this review, we summarize key features of APS-associated cerebrovascular disorders, with focus on clinical and laboratory aspects of diagnostic evaluation. The current status of prognostic markers is considered. We review the evidence base for antithrombotic treatment in APS-associated stroke and discuss uncertainties, including the optimal intensity of anticoagulation and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants. Clinical practice recommendations are provided, covering antithrombotic treatment, supportive management, and options for anticoagulant-refractory cases, and we highlight the benefits of adopting a considered, multidisciplinary team approach.

The use of fondaparinux and rituximab for recurrent thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Limited evidence exists to guide the management of recurrent thrombosis occurring despite therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this case series, fondaparinux, with or without an antiplatelet agent, provided an effective and safe option in three patients with thrombotic APS, all two triple and one single positive for antiphospholipid antibodies, who had recurrent venous and/or arterial thromboembolism. Rituximab was also used in all patients. Recurrent events occurred despite therapeutic anticoagulation, including at high-intensity, with warfarin and subsequent low-molecular-weight heparin. There were no major bleeding events. Adjunctive therapies used for thrombosis included catheter-directed thrombolysis and rituximab.