RECIST 1.1 versus clinico-radiological response assessment for locally advanced cervical cancer: implications on interpreting survival outcomes of future trials.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in standard clinico-radiological evaluation versus Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for reporting survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and brachytherapy. METHODS: Between November 2017 and March 2020, patients recruited in cervical cancer trials were identified. MRI at diagnosis and at least one follow-up imaging was mandatory. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were determined using standard evaluation (clinical examination and symptom-directed imaging) and RECIST 1.1. Agreement between criteria was estimated using κ value. Sensitivity analysis was done to test the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of RECIST 1.1 in detecting response to treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-nine eligible patients had at least one target lesion. Thirty-three patients (47.8%) had pathological lymph nodes. Of these 33 patients, RECIST 1.1 classified only 18% (6/33) as 'target nodal lesions' and the remaining nodes as 'non-target'. There were 6 (8.7%) and 8 (11.6%) patients with disease events using RECIST 1.1 and standard evaluation, respectively. The disease-free survival at 12, 18, and 24 months using RECIST 1.1 was 94.2%, 91.2%, 91.2%, and with standard evaluation was 94.2%, 89.7%, and 88.2%, respectively (p=0.58). Whereas, progression-free survival at 12, 18, and 24 months using RECIST 1.1 and standard evaluation were same (94.2%, 91.2%, and 91.2%, respectively). The κ value was 0.84, showing strong agreement in assessing disease-free survival, although an absolute difference of 3% between endpoint assessment methodologies. RECIST 1.1 had a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 34.91% to 96.81%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 94.13% to 100%), and accuracy of 97.1% (95% CI 89.92% to 99.65%). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed 1.5% and 3% difference in disease-free survival at 18 and 24 months and no difference in progression-free survival between RECIST 1.1 and standard evaluation in a patient cohort with low event rate.

Clinical outcomes of adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy technique in locally advanced cervical cancer: A real-world data.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-based adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC followed by IC-ISBT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in resource-constrained settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LACC patients treated with adaptive brachytherapy techniques were analyzed to evaluate treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test for univariate analysis. RESULTS: Out of 141 eligible patients with LACC, 87 (61.7%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in referral hospitals, while 54 (38.3%) were treated at our center. We divided our cohort into two groups: poor EBRT responder group (n = 70 [49.6%]) where IC-ISBT was adapted to achieve optimum tumor doses and OAR optimization group 71 (50.4%) where IC-ISBT was performed to reduce OAR doses. Median HRCTV-D90 dose was 88 Gy (range 70-109 Gy) with median HRCTV volume 33cc (range 15-96). Median D2cc doses to OARs were 90 Gy (range 70-107), 71 Gy (range 55-105) and 70 Gy (range 47-90) to bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively. At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83%, 75%, 64% and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better outcomes for OAR optimization compared to poor EBRT responders, with 3-year LC (95% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), LRC (87.3% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), DFS (79.2% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), and OS (86.2% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: In resource-constrained settings, implementation of Adaptive IC-ISBT is a viable alternative for optimizing OAR doses in LACC. However proactive approach employing IC-ISBT for tumor dose-escalation from first fraction of BT is warranted for improving LC in poor EBRT responders.

Longitudinal Costs of Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation: Lessons From Phase III PARCER Trial for Shaping Resource-Stratified Guidelines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

PURPOSE: The PARCER trial provided level I evidence for image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) in patients with cervical cancer. Further information regarding long-term financial impact is imperative for adoption into the National Cancer Grid of India cervical cancer resource-stratified guidelines. METHODS: Patient data from the PARCER trial were analyzed to evaluate the cost implications of transitioning to IG-IMRT. Lacking differences in outcomes between the three-dimensional conformal radiation (3D-CRT) and IG-IMRT, differences in treatment costs, adverse event incidence, and toxicity management costs were examined. The overall financial impact was estimated by adding the treatment costs, toxicity management, and wage loss. This was extrapolated nationally to determine if a transition to IG-IMRT would be feasible for the Indian health care system. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients in the PARCER trial, 93 faced grades ≥2 adverse events (3D-CRT = 59, IG-IMRT = 34). Patients in the 3D-CRT and IG-IMRT arms spent an average of 2.39 years and 1.96 years in toxicity, respectively. The average toxicity management and the yearly financial impact per patient were, respectively, 1.50 and 1.44 times higher for 3D-CRT patients compared with IG-IMRT patients. Extrapolation to the national level showed that treatment with 3D-CRT led to a 2.88 times higher cost ratio when compared with treatment with IG-IMRT. CONCLUSION: Although the initial costs of IG-IMRT are high, on the basis of longitudinal data, it is financially inefficient to treat with 3D-CRT. Resource-stratified guidelines should include longitudinal health intervention costs rather than solely initial costs for policy decisions to implement advanced radiation technology.

Clinical Implementation of "Plan of the Day" Strategy in Definitive Radiation Therapy of Cervical Cancer: Online Adaptation to Address the Challenge of Organ Filling Reproducibility.

PURPOSE: Definitive pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer is susceptible to geographic miss due to daily positional and volumetric variations in target and organs at risk. Hence, despite evidence of reduced acute and late treatment-related toxicities, implementation of image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) with a reasonable safety margin to encompass organ motion is challenging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this prospective, nonrandomized phase 2 study, patients with cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2-IIIB between the ages of 18 and 65 years were treated with definitive pelvic chemoradiotherapy with a prespecified organ (bladder and rectum) filling protocol. Reproducibility of organ filling was assessed along with the implementation of daily comprehensive adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), with a library of 3 IMRT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans with incremental expansions of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) (primary) margins (small, 0.7 cm; adequate, 1 cm; and large, 1.5 cm) and a backup motion robust 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan; the appropriate plan is chosen based on pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) ("plan of the day" approach). RESULTS: Fifty patients with a median age of 49 years (IQR, 45-56 years) received definitive radiation therapy (45-46 Gy in 23-25 fractions to pelvis, with simultaneous integrated boost to gross nodes in 15 patients) with the aforementioned IGRT protocol. In the analysis of 1171 CBCT images (in 1184 treatment sessions), the mean planning computed tomography (CT) and CBCT bladder volumes were 417 and 373 cc, respectively. Significant interfractional variation in bladder volume was noted with a mean absolute dispersion of 29.5% with respect to planning CT; significant influential random factors were postchemotherapy sessions (P ≤ .001), pre-CBCT protocol duration (P = .001), and grades of chemotherapy induced nausea vomiting (P = .001). Significantly higher variation in bladder filling was noted in patients with older age (P = .014) and larger planning CT bladder volume (P ≤ .001). Time trend analysis of fraction-wise bladder volume revealed an absolute systemic reduction of 16.3% in bladder volume means from the first to the fifth week. Variation in rectal diameter was much less pronounced, with 19.2% mean dispersion and without any significant factors affecting it. Although in 19% and 2% of sessions large IMRT PTV and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy were necessary to cover the primary target, respectively, reduction in treated volume was possible in 43% of sessions with small PTV selection instead of standard adequate PTV (36% sessions). Plan of the day selection had a moderate to strong correlation with nonabsolute dispersion of bladder filling (Spearman ρ =0.4; P = .001) and a weak (but significant) correlation with grades of acute toxicities. The planned protocol was well tolerated with no radiation-induced local grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Interfractional variation in organ filling (especially bladder) is inevitable despite fixed pretreatment protocol in definitive settings (intact cervix). Despite the logistical challenges, adaptive IGRT in the form of plan of the day based on incremental CTV-to-PTV margins is a relatively simple and feasible strategy to minimize geometric uncertainties in radical IG-IMRT of cervical cancer.

Transitioning India to advanced image based adaptive brachytherapy: a national impact analysis of upgrading National Cancer Grid cervix cancer guidelines.

Background: High-dose-rate image guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for cervical cancer leads to improved local control and reduced toxicity and is a critical component of treatment. However, transition to IGBT requires capacity upscaling. An institutional activity mapping and national impact analysis of such a transition were undertaken to understand feasibility. Methods: Between September 2020 and March 2021, activity mapping was conducted in a high-volume centre that triaged cervical cancer patients for brachytherapy into four workflows; A: two-dimensional (2D) X-Ray point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy, B: CT point A-based intracavitary brachytherapy, C: MRI/CT-volume based intracavitary brachytherapy, D: MRI/CT volume-based intracavitary +/- interstitial brachytherapy. Clinical process time mapping was performed, and case scenarios for transition were modelled at the institutional and national levels based on available incidence and infrastructure levels. Treatment capacity changes were calculated, and potential strategies for workflow reorganisation were proposed. Findings: Eighty-four patients were included in the study. The total time taken for the workflows A, B, C, and D were 176 min (57-208), 224 min (74-260), 267 min (101-302), and 348 min (232-383), respectively. The transition from workflow A to D through sequential steps led to 35%, 49%, and 64% loss of treatment capacity in the index institution. Solutions such as 10-hour or 12-hour overlapping shifts increased treatment capacity by 25% and 50% and performing single implants and delivering multiple fractions increased capacity by 100%. Twenty-three Indian states and Union Territories are predicted to be able to transition to advanced workflows. For four Indian states, it may be detrimental considering the current infrastructure level, and eight Indian states lacked brachytherapy access. Further financial investment is required in the latter 12 states for transition to advanced workflows. Interpretation: Our study demonstrates that unplanned transition to IGBT can lead to treatment capacity loss and increase in waiting lists to access treatment. The proposed solutions of workflow reorganisation, using strategies such as single brachytherapy applicator implant and delivering multiple treatment fractions can improve access to treatment for women with cervix cancer in resource-strained and high patient-volume settings. We recommend state-wise solutions for the upscale from conventional 2D workflows to IGBT, subject to the availability of skilled personnel, infrastructure and training. Financial investments may be needed in some states to achieve this goal. Funding: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supported the salary of VH through project E33042 that focussed on implementation strategies of image guided brachytherapy.

Brachytherapy training in India: Results from the GEC-ESTRO-India survey.

INTRODUCTION: Brachytherapy (BT) is integral in treatment of gynecological malignancies and is also an option for many other cancers. Data on training and proficiency levels of early career oncologists is limited. Like other continents a survey was conducted for early career oncologists in India. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An online survey was conducted from November 2019 to February 2020, through Association of Radiation Oncologists of India (AROI) for early career radiation oncologists expected to be within 6 years of training. The survey used a 22 item questionnaire that was also used for European survey. Responses to individual statements were recorded on a 1-5 Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics were used to describe proportions. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-four (17%) of 700 recipients responded to the survey. Majority of the respondents (88%) stated that being able to perform BT at the end of their training was important. Two-thirds of the respondents (81/124) had performed >10 intracavitary procedure and 22.5% had performed >10 intracavitary-interstitial implants. Many respondents had not performed nongynecological procedure- breast (64%), prostate(82%), gastro-intestinal (47%). Respondents predicted that in next 10 years, the role of BT is likely to increase. Lack of dedicated curriculum and training was perceived as the greatest barriers to achieving independence in BT (58%). Respondents suggested that BT training should be prioritized during conferences (73%) and online teaching modules (56%), along with development of BT skills labs (65%). CONCLUSION: This survey identified a lack of proficiency in gynecological intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy and non-gynecological brachytherapy, despite BT training being regarded as highly important. Dedicated programs, including standardized curriculum and assessment need to be developed for training early- career radiation oncologists in BT.

Sigmoid dose accumulation and reporting for multifractionated brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Methodological development of sigmoid points through virtual endoscopic method.

PURPOSE: The sigmoid is an important organ at risk for gynecological brachytherapy (BT). However, the reliability of localization of high-dose regions during multi-fractionated treatment is limited. This work reports the methodological development of sigmoid points to summate multi-fractionated doses. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Ten paired MRI data sets of ring-based intracavitary brachytherapy were obtained. Simulating a virtual endoscope, a reference line was created along the central axis of the anorectosigmoid for each implant. A trendline was generated, and linear dose was determined. Three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of high-dose regions were identified, and overlap was determined. In the next step, 3D coordinates of high-dose sigmoid points were localized in reference to cervical os and re-verified for location in reference to sigmoid lumen and corroboration with 2cc doses. With minor modifications, sigmoid points were proposed. RESULTS: In 6 of 10 patients, high-dose regions co-localized in subsequent fractions of BT. Three high-dose regions were identified along the sigmoid length and proposed as sigmoid points in reference to cervical os. (S1'= 0.5 cm right, 1.5 cm posterior, and 2.4 cm cranial; S2' = 0.3 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial; S3' = 2.7 cm left, 3 cm anterior, and 3.6 cm cranial to the cervical os). S1' and S2' were located in the sigmoid in 70% and 60% of data sets. The mean difference between D2cc and S1'/S2' was 0.30 Gy and 1.06 Gy respectively. S3' had limited corroboration to sigmoid lumen or 2 cc doses. The points S1' and S2' were further modified (minor) for applicability and proposed as sigmoid points 1 and 2 (SP1 0.5 right,1.5 posterior and 2.5 cm cranial to cervical os and SP2 (0.5 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial to cervical os)). CONCLUSION: SP1 and SP 2 are proposed as a surrogate for 2 cc sigmoid doses and may provide a method of reliable inter-fraction dose summation. This pilot work requires further validation.

Early outcomes of abbreviated multi-fractionated brachytherapy schedule for cervix cancer during COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) for cervix cancer was listed as a level I priority and reduced number of implants and multiple fractions were recommended during COVID-19 pandemic. We present early clinical outcome of this approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy and BT with single implant and multiple fractions BT were included. Treatment protocol included 3-5 fractions of 5-8.5 Gy with an aim to achieve point A dose of 70 Gy EQD210Gy (or HRCTV dose of >80 Gy EQD210Gy) in those undergoing intracavitary (IC) and HRCTV dose >85 Gy EQD2 10Gy in patients undergoing Intracavitary-Interstitial (IC/IS) whereas maintaining bladder (B2cc), rectum (R2cc), sigmoid (S 2cc) doses of 90, 75, and 75 Gy EQD23Gy. Time to event analysis was used to report oncological endpoints. Toxicity was reported using crude proportions. RESULTS: From April 2020 to March, 2021, 64 patients with stage IB2-IV received single implant and multi-fraction BT after external radiation of 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Only 76.7% (n = 49) received concurrent chemotherapy. Median overall treatment time (OTT) was 56 days (38-131 days). Overall, 62.5% (n = 40) patients received IC and 37.5% (n = 24) received IC+IS. The median HRCTV was 34.7 cc (IQR 25-41). Median (IQR) point A dose, HRCTV D90, B2cc, R2cc, and S2cc for those undergoing IC was 74 Gy (71-78), 80 Gy (73-84), 86 Gy (82-89), 70 Gy (65-74), 65 Gy (59-73) respectively. For the IC+IS cohort, HRCTV D90, B2cc, R2cc, and S2cc was 84 Gy (78-89 Gy), 89 Gy (86-92), 70 Gy (67-74), 68 Gy (59-76). At a median follow-up of 16 months (5-27) the 2-year local control, pelvic control, cause specific and overall survival was 88%, 85.3%, 92.2%, and 81.3% respectively. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary grade ≥III toxicities were 14% and 1.5% each. CONCLUSIONS: Abbreviated BT outcomes are encouraging for oncological outcomes despite delays in overall treatment time and omission of chemotherapy. Further mature follow up is needed.

Serial Bone Density Changes in Women Undergoing Pelvic (Chemo) Radiation: Results From the PARCER Trial.

PURPOSE: Pelvic irradiation leads to substantial dose to the pelvic girdle. However, bone density loss as a function of radiation therapy dose and time has not been investigated. This study was undertaken to evaluate such a dose-response relationship. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy for cervix cancer within a phase 3 trial were included. The study necessitated 2 computed tomography imaging sets acquired at least 12 months apart in patients with no evidence of relapse. All images were transferred to the treatment planning system to determine radiation dose and Hounsfield unit (HU). Across the entire lumbopelvic region (lumbar 1-5 [L1-5] vertebrae, pubic symphysis, femur, acetabulum, greater trochanter, and anterior-superior iliac spine) multiple regions were defined to measure radiation therapy dose and HU. Bone health was categorized as normal if >130 HU, osteopenic at 110 to 130 HU, and osteoporotic <110 HU at baseline and follow-up. Univariate analysis was performed to test the effect of various factors on HU. Further interaction among radiation therapy dose, time, and HU was assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Overall, 132 of 300 patients were eligible. The median age was 49 (42-56) years. With a prescription dose of 50 Gy, the L1 and L2 vertebrae received a median dose of 1.2 and 4 Gy, respectively, and L3-5 received 10 to 50 Gy. At 24 months, median HU loss at L4-5 was 45 HU (interquartile range, 34-77 HU). Out of the 132 patients, at baseline 96% had normal bone health. However, at the last follow-up, 3% of patients had normal bone health, 12% developed osteopenia, and 85% developed osteoporosis (P < .001). There were no patient- or treatment-related factors predicted for HU loss on univariate analysis. HU loss >60 to 70 was observed at >45 Gy at L5 vertebra (60-70 HU, P < .02) and >15 Gy at L4 vertebra (33 HU; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-response relationship is observed between radiation dose and bone mineral density loss. Prospective studies are needed to corroborate these observations and design future interventions.

Salvage (Re)radiation in Oligometastatic and Oligorecurrent Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE: In patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, the median survival time is 13 to 24 months based on the choice of palliative systemic chemotherapy. Evolving evidence suggests that the addition of radiation may lead to improved survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients treated with radiation with or without systemic chemotherapy for oligometastatic or oligorecurrent disease within the period from 2017 to 2020 were included. All patients received systemic chemotherapy consultation and radiation to relapsed or metastatic sites. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined as the period between diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and the last progression of the disease. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and follow-up or death. The effect of various prognostic and predictive factors was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were included. The median time to relapse was 18 months (8-205 months). At the time of first relapse, 34.4% of patients (n = 20) had locoregional relapse, 32.8% (n = 19) had distant nodal metastases, and 32.8% (n = 19) had visceral metastases. The relapse was within previously irradiated portals in 34.5% (n = 20), out of field in 50% (n = 29), and both in 15.5% (n = 9) of patients. Overall, 56% of patients (n = 33) received systemic chemotherapy. The radiation therapy dose in equivalent doses of 2 Gy at the time of retreatment was 44 Gy (31-68 Gy). The median PFS and OS from the date of first relapse were 16 (12-19) and 28 months (2-108), respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients. No patient- or treatment-related factor was identified as predictive of OS on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of potentially radical doses of radiation, including reirradiation at locoregional or distant oligorelapse or metastasis, is associated with encouraging PFS and OS in patients with cervical cancer.

Dose Accumulation for Multicourse Gynecological Reirradiation: A Methodological Narrative and Clinical Examples.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation (re-RT) is a suitable and potentially curative treatment option for in-field locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. Lack of clear guidelines on prescription, dose-response relationship, and clinical outcomes limits its clinical use. This clinical narrative describes the methodology for integration of deformable image registration (DIR) for cumulative dose assessment in the setting of re-RT for gynecologic malignancies, using the tools available within a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients who received re-RT for locoregional recurrence or second cancer within previously irradiated areas for a gynecologic primary were identified. Patient-specific DIR for deformable dose mapping and accumulation was retrospectively performed using intensity-based algorithm provided by the Varian Medical Systems Velocity AI version 4.1. Cumulative equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) delivered to overlapping targets and organs at risk were generated and compared with the physically summated doses. For both approaches, brachytherapy (BT) component was physically summated in cases where the BT applicator caused significant anatomic distortion. RESULTS: The mean maximum cumulative overlapping target dose was 119.4 Gy10 (range, 84.7 Gy10-144.9 Gy10). The mean cumulative doses received by 2 cm3 of bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel were 114.6 Gy3 (101.1-133.4 Gy3), 98.7 Gy3 (67-136.2 Gy3), 92.5 Gy3 (70.4-107 Gy3), and 89.9 Gy3 (81.1-102.8 Gy3), respectively. In the setting of in-field nodal recurrence, DIR-based dose summation was associated with lower cumulative organs at risk doses than those estimated with physical summation, except in one case with a higher bowel dose. In cases where re-RT was given for local recurrence/second primary, variation in sigmoid doses was observed between the 2 dose-summation strategies across all 3 cases, but it was inconsistent with bladder, rectum, or the bowel. CONCLUSIONS: DIR-based dose accumulation can be used to guide re-RT planning and can provide clinically relevant information, especially in cases with nodal recurrences. Registration of BT data sets remain challenging and requires an individualized assessment when applying these algorithms to clinical practice.

Months and Severity Score (MOSES) in a Phase III trial (PARCER): A new comprehensive method for reporting adverse events in oncology clinical trials.

Background: Adverse event reporting in oncology trials lacks temporal description. We propose a toxicity summarizing method that incorporates time. Methods: Patients recruited in a phase III trial (NCT01279135) that compared three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for late toxicity in cervical cancer were included. Adverse events were reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 and quality of life (QOL) with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24. A total of six symptoms with a related QOL question (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anorexia, urinary incontinence, frequency and fatigue) were included. Month and severity score [MOSES= ∑ (CTCAE grade x proportionate time)] was calculated. Cumulative-MOSES (C-MOSES) was calculated by summating these 6 individual MOSES. QoL was categorized as "substantially symptomatic" or "not". Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the MOSES cut off that predicts for substantial QOL symptoms. CTCAE and MOSES were tested for accurately categorizing QOL impact. Findings: In the construction dataset, 201/300 patients had symptoms. MOSES > 0.20 had higher accuracy than CTCAE for predicting impact on QOL related to diarrhoea (85% vs. 69%), anorexia (61% vs 51%), abdominal pain (71% vs. 57%), urinary incontinence (72% vs. 61%) and frequency (62% vs. 59%). C-MOSES > 0·70 correlated with reduction in role functioning and global QOL. While no difference was seen in CTCAE grade ≥1 Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity between 3DCRT or IMRT arm, 3DCRT had higher C-MOSES than IMRT (HR=0.64;95% CI 0.41-0.99, p = 0.04). Interpretation: MOSES has higher accuracy than CTCAE in categorizing symptom specific and functional QOL. These results require further external validation. Funding: None.

Concurrent chemoradiation and brachytherapy alone or in combination with nelfinavir in locally advanced cervical cancer (NELCER): study protocol for a phase III trial.

INTRODUCTION: In locally advanced cervical cancer, nodal, local and distant relapse continue to be significant patterns of relapse. Therefore, strategies to improve the efficacy of chemoradiation are desirable such as biological pathway modifiers and immunomodulating agents. This trial will investigate the impact of nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor that targets the protein kinase B (AKT) pathway on disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Radiosensitising effect of nelfinavir in locally advanced carcinoma of cervix is a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomised phase-III study. Patients aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of carcinoma cervix stage III are eligible for the study. After consenting, patients will undergo randomisation to chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm or nelfinavir with chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm. The primary aim of the study is to compare the difference in 3-year DFS between the two arms. Secondary aims are locoregional control, overall survival, toxicity and quality of life between the two arms. Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its impact on tumour AKT, programmed cell death ligand 1, cluster of differentiation 4, cluster of differentiation 8 and natural killer 1.1 expression will be investigated. The overall sample size of 348 with 1 planned interim analysis achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a HR of 0.66 when the proportion surviving in the control arm is 0.65. The planned study duration is 8 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee-I of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai (reference number: IEC/0317/1543/001) and will be monitored by the data safety monitoring committee. The study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conference presentations. Study participants will be accrued after obtaining written informed consent from them. The confidentiality and privacy of study participants will be maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/08/009265) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03256916).

Postoperative adjuvant radiation for cervix cancer: reflections on the evidence and a peep into the future.

Early stage cervical cancer, stages IB1-2 and IIA1, can be treated with (chemo)radiation and brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy with or without further adjuvant (chemo)radiation. In a carefully selected cohort for surgery, traditionally a small proportion of patients would need adjuvant (chemo)radiation so that the therapeutic ratio is maximized. However, advances in radiation technology, specifically intensity modulated radiotherapy, have led to a reduction in treatment related adverse events. Also, recent developments in risk stratification suggest using a lower threshold to offer adjuvant treatment to minimize pelvic relapse. These developments together present opportunities of not only re-examining the therapeutic ratio but also of further evolving postoperative risk stratification. This review article summarizes the current evidence on adjuvant treatment strategies and summarizes the key areas where research should be focused.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

We investigated whether the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches in the databases of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science yielded 881 articles. Two reviewer authors independently selected 31 articles for full text review and deemed eight studies eligible for inclusion. Two were randomised controlled trials (RCT), one was a large (n = 609) matched-case study and the remaining were small retrospective cohort studies; in total 2150 patients. Risk of bias assessment showed that the RCTs were at low risk and all other studies were at high risk of bias. Pooled hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.78 (95%CI 0.45-1.33, p = 0.36) and 0.85 (95%CI 0.65-1.10, p = 0.22), respectively. Analysis stratified by study design and sensitivity analysis showed similar results. Funnel plots showed significant publication bias due to a lack of small studies with negative outcomes.

Patterns of Relapse After Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (PARCER): An Evaluation of Updated NRG Oncology/RTOG Target Delineation Guidelines.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) under NRG Oncology recently published updated contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiation therapy in postoperative treatment for endometrial and cervical cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the implications of newly published guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We recruited 300 patients in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer (NCT01279135) to understand patterns of relapse. For those patients with pelvic relapse, we imported radiation therapy structure sets, treatment plans, and diagnostic images at relapse on the treatment planning system. We performed rigid registration with treatment planning images that contained the delineated planning target volume and radiation dose information. We delineated gross tumor volume at time of relapse on the diagnostic scans and superimposed it on the radiation therapy treatment scans. We categorized the site of pelvic relapse as "within field of old RTOG/[Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER)] target delineation guidelines" or "within field of new NRG/RTOG guidelines," or both, and compared proportions of recurrences contained within the 2 guidelines. We consider a P value of <.05 statistically significant. Additionally, we generated intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans based on the new guidelines for a limited set of patients to see if these new guidelines increased the organ at risk doses. RESULTS: Most common form of relapse was distant metastasis (15%). Pelvic relapse rate in our study was 8%. Overall, 9 out of 19 relapses were encompassed in the contouring guidelines of the old RTOG/ Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER) trial, and 12 out of 19 were encompassed within the new RTOG 2021 contouring guidelines. This corresponded to a further 1% reduction in local relapses (P = .007). Dose to rectum was marginally increased with the new contouring, with no difference in other organs at risk. Salvage treatment was offered in 25 out of 60 patients who relapsed. Patients who received local treatment after relapse had a mean survival after relapse of 27.2 months compared with 8 months among those who received supportive care alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of newly published NRG/RTOG contouring guidelines in patients with cervical cancer who have undergone hysterectomy. Further data are needed to ascertain if anterior extension of the clinical target volume is needed as in the Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer trial.

Adjuvant Systemic Therapy after Chemoradiation and Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is chemoradiation and brachytherapy. The addition of adjuvant systemic treatment may improve overall survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize evidence on survival outcomes, treatment completion and toxicity. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched for relevant prospective and retrospective studies. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Pooled hazard ratios for survival endpoints were estimated using random effect models. Weighted averages of treatment completion and toxicity rates were calculated and compared by the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: The search returned 612 articles; 35 articles reporting on 29 different studies on adjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy were selected for systematic review. Twelve studies on an adjuvant platinum-pyrimidine antagonist or platinum-taxane were included for meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.76 (99%CI: 0.43-1.34, p = 0.22) and 0.47 (99%CI: 0.12-1.86, p = 0.16) for the addition of, respectively, a platinum-pyrimidine antagonist or platinum-taxane to chemoradiation and brachytherapy. Completion rates were 82% (95%CI: 76-87%) for platinum-pyrimidine antagonist and 74% (95%CI: 63-85%) for platinum-taxane. Severe acute hematological and gastro-intestinal toxicities were significantly increased by adding adjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation and brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of adjuvant platinum-pyrimidine antagonist or platinum-taxane after chemoradiation and brachytherapy does not significantly improve overall survival, while acute toxicity is significantly increased. These adjuvant treatment strategies can therefore not be recommended for unselected patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: In 2018, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) proposed a new staging for cervical cancer. The present study was designed to reclassify patients with locally advanced cervix cancer and perform a comparative evaluation with FIGO 2009. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB2-IVA) who had baseline cross-sectional imaging and received (chemo-) radiation and brachytherapy were included. Survival outcomes were analyzed according to FIGO 2009. Patients were then reclassified according to FIGO 2018, and TNM classification outcomes were analyzed. FIGO stage and known prognostic factors were included in univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the prognostic value of clinical stage. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-two patients were included. Overall, 185 (29.3%) patients had pelvic adenopathy, and 51 (8.2%) had positive paraortic nodes. At a median follow-up of 33 months, 116 (18.3%) patients had recurrence. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) according to FIGO 2009 for stage IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA was 86%, 91%, 76%, 57%, 65%, and 61%, respectively. The 3-year DFS after restaging according to FIGO 2018 for stage IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC1, IIIC2, and IVA was 100%, 93%, 84%, 53%, 77%, 74%, 61%, and 61%, respectively. Patients with clinically significant lymphadenopathy had inferior outcomes compared with node-negative patients (62.9% vs 77.8%; P = .002). Patients with ≥3 paraortic nodes had poorer DFS than patients with <3 paraortic lymphadenopathy (13.6% vs 56.3%; P = .001). Furthermore, patients with primary tumor volume >30 cm3 had worse 3-year DFS than those with primary tumor volume ≤30 cm3 (67.4% vs 78.5%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: FIGO 2018 modification is associated with heterogenous outcomes in node-positive patients that are affected by primary tumor and nodal volume. We propose a modification to the existing TNM staging system to allow more robust classification of outcomes.

Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance-Based Brachytherapy?

Purpose Recent guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging-based brachytherapy (MRBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, its implementation is challenging within the developing world. This article reports the outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and point A-based brachytherapy (BT) using x-ray- or computed tomography-based planning. Methods Patients treated between January 2014 and December 2015 were included. Patients underwent x-ray- or computed tomography-based BT planning with an aim to deliver equivalent doses in 2 Gy (EQD2) > 84 Gy10 to point A while minimizing maximum dose received by rectum or bladder to a point or 2 cc volume to < 75 Gy EQD2 and < 90 Gy EQD2, respectively. The impact of known prognostic factors was evaluated. Results A total of 339 patients were evaluated. Median age was 52 (32 to 81) years; 52% of patients had stage IB2 to IIB and 48% had stage III to IVA disease. There was 85% compliance with chemoradiation, and 87% of patients received four or more cycles. Median point A dose was 84 (64.8 to 89.7) Gy. The median rectal and bladder doses were 73.5 (69.6 to 78.4) Gy3 and 83 (73.2 to 90.0) Gy3, respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 (4 to 45) months, the 3-year local, disease-free, and overall survival for stage IB to IIB disease was 94.1%, 83.3%, and 82.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III to IVA were 85.1%, 60.7%, and 69.6%. Grade III to IV proctitis and cystitis were observed in 4.7% and 0% of patients, respectively. Conclusion This audit demonstrates good 3-year outcomes that are comparable to published MRBT series. Conventional BT with selective use of interstitial needles and MRBT should continue as standard procedures until level-I evidence for MRBT becomes available.