ABSTRACT
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease that causes severe joint destruction and persistent inflammation. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of various herbal interventions in managing RA, providing valuable insights for patients and healthcare practitioners. To investigate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of selected herbal interventions, including turmeric, ginger, Boswellia serrata (frankincense), green tea, and Ashwagandha, to assess their potential as complementary treatments for RA, a comprehensive analysis is performed on the anti-inflammatory mechanisms and antioxidant effects of selected herbs. Emphasis is placed on the modulation of key inflammatory pathways and their ability to counteract oxidative stress, which are crucial factors in RA progression. Safety profiles and potential adverse effects of herbal remedies are also scrutinized. The review reveals promising evidence supporting the efficacy of turmeric and ginger in alleviating RA symptoms by modulating inflammatory pathways. Additionally, Boswellia serrata shows potential as an adjunct therapy for joint health and inflammation. The antioxidant-rich properties of green tea and Ashwagandha are highlighted, suggesting their role in counteracting oxidative stress associated with RA. In conclusion, while herbal remedies like turmeric, ginger, Boswellia serrata, green tea, and Ashwagandha offer potential complementary treatments for RA, their safety profiles and adverse effects warrant careful consideration. Rigorous clinical trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety, highlighting the necessity for further research in this area. These findings are crucial for patients and healthcare providers in making informed decisions about incorporating herbal interventions into RA treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
The Diagnosis and classification of periodontal diseases has remained a dilemma since long. Two distinct concepts have been used to define diseases: Essentialism and Nominalism. Essentialistic concept implies the real existence of disease whereas; nominalistic concept states that the names of diseases are the convenient way of stating concisely the endpoint of a diagnostic process. It generally advances from assessment of symptoms and signs toward knowledge of causation and gives a feasible option to name the disease for which etiology is either unknown or it is too complex to access in routine clinical practice. Various classifications have been proposed by the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) in 1986, 1989 and 1999. The AAP 1999 classification is among the most widely used classification. But this classification also has demerits which provide impediment for its use in day to day practice. Hence a classification and diagnostic system is required which can help the clinician to access the patient's need and provide a suitable treatment which is in harmony with the diagnosis for that particular case. Here is an attempt to propose a practicable classification and diagnostic system of periodontal diseases for better treatment outcome.
