ABSTRACT
In 1992, Israel's Services for the Aged identified private institutions for the elderly operating illegally, which are notorious for poor quality. This article presents the findings of screening visits in 97 "pirate" institutions, as part of a plan to improve surveillance, and evaluates the outcomes as a measure of the effectiveness of intervention. Although a high proportion of deficiencies was found, some institutions showed a significant ability to correct them.
Subject(s)
Housing for the Elderly/standards , Licensure , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sentinel Surveillance , Aged , Caregivers/standards , Consumer Behavior , Elder Abuse , Entrepreneurship , Housing for the Elderly/classification , Housing for the Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Israel , Nursing Care/standards , Public Health Administration , Total Quality ManagementABSTRACT
An interjudge reliability test was conducted to evaluate the questionnaires used in the surveillance of residential care institutions. Because the reliability test was carried out as part of the routine surveillance program and not as part of a controlled experiment, it was subject to deviations from the optimal reliability test model. However, this nonpure design provided an opportunity to not only examine the reliability of the items in the surveillance tool, but also to gain a better understanding of the use of a reliability test in an "imperfect" field setting. Two different surveyor teams administered the 257 questions on the questionnaires to a representative sample of 32 institutions on two separate occasions. In order to explain the variance in the reliability scores, a multivariate analysis was conducted for two units of analysis: the surveillance questions and the institutions. Based on the results of the reliability test, changes were introduced to improve the questionnaires and their administration.
Subject(s)
Program Evaluation/methods , Quality of Health Care , Residential Facilities/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Humans , Israel , Patient Satisfaction , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
As part of the evaluation of an experimental programme of surveillance of institutions for the semi-independent and frail elderly using the regulation, assessment, follow-up (RAF) method, an examination was made of the licensing status, quality of care, and completeness of the surveillance process. Included in the examination were 126 institutions which underwent the surveillance process between 1990 and 1993. Aims to investigate whether the RAF method of surveillance was being implemented in a professional and uniform manner. Concludes that surveyor's recommendations to grant or not grant a licence were usually based on findings about the quality of care. Nevertheless, in order to reinforce the relationship between licensing and quality of care, it was suggested that surveyors be given clear criteria of quality on which to base their recommendations regarding conditional licensing. It was found that the surveillance process is indeed implemented uniformly in long-term care institutions of varying quality.
