Effects of Mechanical Performance on Deliverability and Dose Distribution by Comparing Multi Institutions' Knowledge-based Models for Prostate Cancer in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance and the effect on dose distribution and deliverability of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for prostate cancer created with the commercial knowledge-based planning (KBP) system (RapidPlan™). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three institutions, A, B, and C were enrolled in this study. Each institution established and trained a KBP model with their own cases. CT data and structures for 45 patients at institution B were utilized to validate the dose-volume parameters (D2(%), D95(%), and D98(%) for target, and V50(%), V75(%), and V90(%) for rectum and bladder), and the following mechanical performance parameters and gamma passing rates of each KBP model: leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), total monitor unit (MU), modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), MU/control point (CP), aperture area (AA)/CP, and MU×AA/CP. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<0.01) in dosimetric parameters such as D2 and D98 for target and V50, V75, and V90 for bladder were observed among the three institutions. The means and standard deviations of MCSv were 0.31±0.03, 0.29±0.02, and 0.32±0.03, and the angles of maximum and minimum MU×AA/CP were 269° and 13°, 269° and 13°, and 273° and 153° at institutions A, B, and C, respectively. The mean gamma passing rate (1%/1 mm.) was >95% for all cases in each institution. Dose distribution and mechanical performance significantly differed between the three models. CONCLUSION: Each KBP model had different dose distributions and mechanical performance but could create an acceptable plan for deliverability regardless of mechanical performance.

Characteristics of microSilicon diode detector for electron beam dosimetry.

A microSilicon™ (PTW type 60023), a new unshielded diode detector succeeding Diode E (model 60017, PTW), was characterized for electron beam dosimetry and compared with other detectors. Electron beams generated from a TrueBeam linear accelerator were measured using the microSilicon, Diode E, and microDiamond synthetic single-crystal diamond detector. Positional accuracy of microSilicon was measured by data collected in air and water. The percent depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), dose-response linearity, dose rate dependence, and cone factors were evaluated. The PDDs were compared with data measured using a PPC40 plane-parallel ionization chamber. The maximum variations of depth of 50% and 90% of the maximum dose, and practical depth among all detectors and energies were 0.9 mm. The maximum variations of the bremsstrahlung dose among all detectors and energies were within 0.3%. OCR showed good agreement within 1% for the flat and tail regions. The microSilicon detector showed a penumbra width similar to microDiamond, whereas Diode E showed the steepest penumbra shape. All detectors showed good dose-response linearity and stability against the dose rate; only Diode E demonstrated logarithmic dose rate dependency. The cone factor measured with microSilicon was within ±1% for all energies and cone sizes. We demonstrated that the characteristics of microSilicon is suitable for electron beam dosimetry. The microSilicon detector can be a good alternative for electron beam dosimetry in terms of providing an appropriate PDD curve without corrections, high spatial resolution for OCR measurements and cone factors.

Characteristics of a bolus created using thermoplastic sheets for postmastectomy radiation therapy.

This study applied a "shell bolus," an immobilizing thermoplastic shell locally thickened with extra layers over the radiation target, during postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). We performed ion chamber and film measurements for a solid water phantom for thermoplastic sheets and a gel bolus for dosimetric characterization using a 6-MV X-ray flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam. The air gaps between the body surface for the gel and shell bolus were measured using computed tomography (CT) images in patients who underwent PMRT. This included seven and 13 patients treated with the gel and shell boluses, respectively. A comparison of the dose differences between a 10-mm gel bolus and a 9.6-mm-thick thermoplastic sheet at the surface and 5 cm below the surface showed a 4.2% higher surface dose and 0.5% lower dose at 5-cm depth for the thermoplastic sheet compared to those for the gel bolus. The mean (p = 0.029) and maximum (p < 0.001) air gaps of the shell bolus were significantly thinner than those of the gel bolus. Thus, the shell bolus provided a close fit and robust bolus effect. In addition, the shell bolus reduced respiratory motion and eliminated the need for skin marking. Therefore, this system can be effectively used as a bolus for PMRT.

Correction of lateral response artifacts from flatbed scanners for dual-channel radiochromic film dosimetry.

In this study, we evaluated the inter-unit variability of the lateral response artifact for multiple flatbed scanners, focusing on the dual-channel method, and investigated the correction method of the lateral non-uniformity. Four scanners with A3+ paper-size and five scanners with A4 paper-size were evaluated. To generate the dose-response curves, small pieces of the Gafchromic EBT3 and EBT-XD films were irradiated, and five of the pieces were repeatedly scanned by moving them on the scanner to evaluate the lateral non-uniformity. To calculate the dose distribution accounting for the lateral non-uniformity, linear functions of the correction factor, representing the difference between the pixel values at offset position and the scanner midline, were calculated for red and blue color channels at each lateral position. Large variations of the lateral non-uniformity among the scanners were observed, even for the same model of scanner. For high dose, red color showed pixel value profiles similar to symmetric curves, whereas the profiles for low dose were asymmetric. The peak positions changed with dose. With correction of the lateral non-uniformity, the dose profiles of the pyramidal dose distribution measured at various scanner positions and that calculated with a treatment planning system showed almost identical profile shapes at all high-, middle- and low-dose levels. The dual-channel method used in this study showed almost identical dose profiles measured with all A3+ and A4 paper-size scanners at any positions when the corrections were applied for each color channel.

Collection and analysis of photon beam data for Varian C-series linear accelerators: a potential reference beam data set.

This study aimed to collect and analyze photon beam data for the Varian C-series linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). We evaluated the potential of the average data to be used as reference beam data for the radiotherapy treatment planning system commissioning verification. We collected 20 data sets for 4 and 6 MV photon beams, and 40 data sets for a 10 MV photon beam generated by the Varian C-series machines, which contained the percent depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), and output factor (OPF) from 20 institutions. The average for each of the data types was calculated across the 20 machines. Dose differences from the average for PDD at the dose fall-off region were less than 1.0%. Relative differences from the average for the OPF data were almost within 1.0% for all energies and field sizes. For OCR data in the flat regions, the standard deviation of the dose differences from the average was within 1.0%, excluding that of the 30 × 30 mm2 field size being approximately 1.5%. For all energies and field sizes, the distance to agreement from the average in the OCR penumbra regions was less than 1.0 mm. The average data except for the small field size found in this study can be used as reference beam data for verifying users' commissioning results.

Evaluation of the Differences Between Measurements in Multiple Institutions and Calculation Modeled by Representative Beam Data in Prostate VMAT Plan.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the potential differences between multi-institutional measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculation modeled by representative beam data for patient-specific quality assurance (QA), including multi-leaf collimator (MLC) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven TrueBeam from nine institutions were used in this study. Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plan for verification was created using Eclipse. The point dose of the CC13 ionization chamber and the dose distribution of the GAFCHROMIC EBT3 film were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Point dose differences in patient-specific QA provided a mean±standard deviation of 1.0%±0.6%. Mean gamma pass rates of dose distribution were in excess of 99% and 96% for 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was good agreement between measurements and calculations, indicating the small influence of complex VMAT in the underlying processes. Therefore, implementation of the same MLC parameters on TPS among different institutions with the same planning policy should be considered to ensure consistency and efficiency in radiation treatment processes.

Characterization of a microSilicon diode detector for small-field photon beam dosimetry.

This study characterized a new unshielded diode detector, the microSilicon (model 60023), for small-field photon beam dosimetry by evaluating the photon beams generated by a TrueBeam STx and a CyberKnife. Temperature dependence was evaluated by irradiating photons and increasing the water temperature from 11.5 to 31.3°C. For Diode E, microSilicon, microDiamond and EDGE detectors, dose linearity, dose rate dependence, energy dependence, percent-depth-dose (PDD), beam profiles and detector output factor (OFdet) were evaluated. The OFdet of the microSilicon detector was compared to the field output factors of the other detectors. The microSilicon exhibited small temperature dependence within 0.4%, although the Diode E showed a linear variation with a ratio of 0.26%/°C. The Diode E and EDGE detectors showed positive correlations between the detector reading and dose rate, whereas the microSilicon showed a stable response within 0.11%. The Diode E and microSilicon demonstrated negative correlations with the beam energy. The OFdet of microSilicon was the smallest among all the detectors. The maximum differences between the OFdet of microSilicon and the field output factors of microDiamond were 2.3 and 1.6% for 5 × 5 mm2 TrueBeam and 5 mm φ CyberKnife beams, respectively. The PDD data exhibited small variations in the dose fall-off region. The microSilicon and microDiamond detectors yielded similar penumbra widths, whereas the other detectors showed steeper penumbra profiles. The microSilicon demonstrated favorable characteristics including small temperature and dose rate dependence as well as the small spatial resolution and output factors suitable for small field dosimetry.

Inter-unit variability of multi-leaf collimator parameters for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: a multi-institutional survey.

Modern treatment machines have shown small inter-unit variability regarding beam data. Recently, vendor-provided average beam data, such as the Representative Beam Data (RBD) of the TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), has been used for modeling of the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system. However, RBD does not provide multi-leaf collimator (MLC) parameters, such as MLC leaf transmission factor (LTF) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG). We performed a web-based multi-institutional survey to investigate these parameters as well as the measurement protocols and customization of the parameters for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and/or volumetric modulated radiotherapy (VMAT) commissioning. We collected 69 sets of linear accelerator (linac) data from 58 institutions. In order to measure MLC parameters, most institutions used farmer-type ionization chambers with a sensitive volume of 0.6 cm3, water phantoms, source surface distance of 90 cm with 10 cm depth, and a vendor-provided plan. The LTF showed small inter-unit variabilities, although the DLG showed large variations. For optimization of the parameters for IMRT/VMAT calculations, DLG values were upwardly adjusted at many institutions, whereas the LTF values were modestly changed. We clarified that MLC parameters were measured under the same conditions at more than half of the facilities. Most institutions customized parameters in a similar manner for IMRT/VMAT. The median measured and customized values obtained in our study will be valuable to verify MLC installation accuracy and to shorten the iterative processes of finding the optimal values.

Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases.

We assessed the effect of collimator angle on the dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs) for collimator-optimized HA (CO-HA) and non-CO-HA (nCO-HA) plans. The nCO-HA and CO-HA plans were retrospectively generated for 26 patients (1 to 8 brain metastases). The dosimetric parameters for planning target volume (homogeneity index [HI]; conformity index [CI]; gradient index [GI]) and for OARs were compared. The modulation complexity score for volumetric modulated arc therapy (MCSV) and monitor units (MUs) were calculated. Doses were measured using the electronic portal imaging device and compared with the expected doses. Dosimetric parameters of the HI, CI, and GI for single (n = 12) and multiple (n = 14) metastases cases were comparable (p > 0.05). For multiple metastases cases, the CO-HA plan provided lower V4Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, V16Gy for brain tissue compared to the nCO-HA plan (p < 0.05). Doses for OARs (D0.1cc) (brainstem, chiasm, Hippocampus, lens, optic nerves, and retinas) were comparable (p > 0.05). For multiple metastases cases, the CO-HA plan resulted in less complex multileaf collimator (MLC) patterns (MCSV = 0.19 ± 0.04, p < 0.01), lower MUs (8596 ± 1390 MUs, p < 0.01), and shorter beam-on time (6.2 ± 1.0 min, p < 0.01) compared to the nCO-HA plan (0.16 ± 0.04, 9365 ± 1630, and 6.7 ± 1.2 for MCSV, MUs, and beam-on time, respectively). For both treatment approach, the equivalent gamma passing rate was obtained with the 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria (p > 0.05). The collimator optimization in the HA planning reduced doses to brain tissues and improved the treatment efficacy.

Small-field dosimetry of TrueBeamTM flattened and flattening filter-free beams: A multi-institutional analysis.

PURPOSE: Detector-dependent interinstitutional variations of the beam data may lead to uncertainties of the delivered dose to patients. Here we evaluated the inter-unit variability of the flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) beam data of multiple TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems) linear accelerators focusing on the small-field dosimetry. METHODS: The beam data of 6- and 10-MV photon beams with and without flattening filter measured for modeling of an iPLAN treatment planning system (BrainLAB) were collected from 12 institutions - ten HD120 Multileaf Collimator (MLC) and two Millennium120 MLC. Percent-depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), and detector output factors (OFdet ) measured with different detectors were evaluated. To investigate the detector-associated effects, we evaluated the inter-unit variations of the OFdet before and after having applied the output correction factors provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Reports Series no. 483. RESULTS: PDD measured with a field size of 5 × 5 mm2 showed that the data measured using an ionization chamber had variations exceeding 1% from the median values. The maximum difference from median value was 2.87% for 10 MV photon beam. The maximum variations of the penumbra width for OCR with 10 × 10 mm2 field size were 0.97 mm. The OFdet showed large variations exceeding 15% for a field size of 5 × 5 mm2 . When the output correction factors were applied to the OFdet , the variations were greatly reduced. The relative difference of almost all field output factors were within ± 5% from the median field output factors. CONCLUSION: In this study, the inter-unit variability of small-field dosimetry was evaluated for TrueBeam linear accelerators. The variations were large at a field size of 5 × 5 mm2 , and most occurred in a detector-dependent manner.

Feasibility of synthetic computed tomography generated with an adversarial network for multi-sequence magnetic resonance-based brain radiotherapy.

The aim of this work is to generate synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images from multi-sequence magnetic resonance (MR) images using an adversarial network and to assess the feasibility of sCT-based treatment planning for brain radiotherapy. Datasets for 15 patients with glioblastoma were selected and 580 pairs of CT and MR images were used. T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences were combined to create a three-channel image as input data. A conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) was trained using image patches. The image quality was evaluated using voxel-wise mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the CT number. For the dosimetric evaluation, 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated using the original CT set and recalculated using the sCT images. The isocenter dose and dose-volume parameters were compared for 3D-CRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The equivalent path length was also compared. The mean MAEs for the whole body, soft tissue and bone region were 108.1 ± 24.0, 38.9 ± 10.7 and 366.2 ± 62.0 hounsfield unit, respectively. The dosimetric evaluation revealed no significant difference in the isocenter dose for 3D-CRT plans. The differences in the dose received by 2% of the volume (D2%), D50% and D98% relative to the prescribed dose were <1.0%. The overall equivalent path length was shorter than that for real CT by 0.6 ± 1.9 mm. A treatment planning study using generated sCT detected only small, clinically negligible differences. These findings demonstrated the feasibility of generating sCT images for MR-only radiotherapy from multi-sequence MR images using cGAN.

Impact of detector selections on inter-institutional variability of flattening filter-free beam data for TrueBeam™ linear accelerators.

This study evaluates the type of detector influencing the inter-institutional variability in flattening filter-free (FFF) beam-specific parameters for TrueBeam™ linear accelerators (Varian Medical Systems,Palo Alto, CA, USA). Twenty-four beam data sets, including the percent depth dose (PDD), off-center ratio (OCR), and output factor (OPF) for modeling within the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system, were collected from 19 institutions. Although many institutions collected the data using CC13 (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) or PTW31010 semiflex (PTW Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany) ionization chambers, some institutions used diode detectors, diamond detectors, and ionization chambers with smaller cavities. The OCR data included penumbra width, full width at half maximum (FWHM), and FFF beam-specific parameters, including unflatness and slope. The data measured by CC13/PTW31010 ionization chambers were compared with those measured by all other detectors. PDD data demonstrated the variations within ±1% at the dose fall-off region deeper than peak depth. The penumbra widths of the OCR measured with the CC13/PTW31010 detectors were significantly larger than those measured with all other detectors (P < 0.05). Especially the EDGE detector (Sun Nuclear Corp., Melbourne, FL, USA) and the microDiamond detectors (model 60019; PTW Freiburg) demonstrated much smaller penumbra values compared to those of the CC13/PTW31010 detectors for the 30 × 30 mm2 field. There was no difference in the FWHM, unflatness, and slope parameters between the values for the CC13/PTW31010 detectors and all other detectors. OPF curves demonstrated small variations, and the relative difference from the mean value of each data point was almost within 1% for all field sizes. Although the penumbra region exhibited detector-dependent variations, all other parameters showed tiny interunit variations regardless of the detector type.

Dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors in stereotactic radiosurgery with HyperArc for single and multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with single-isocentric treatments for brain metastases, rotational setup errors may cause considerable dosimetric effects. We assessed the dosimetric effects on HyperArc plans for single and multiple metastases. METHODS: For 29 patients (1-8 brain metastases), HyperArc plans with a prescription dose of 20-24 Gy for a dose that covers 95% (D95% ) of the planning target volume (PTV) were retrospectively generated (Ref-plan). Subsequently, the computed tomography (CT) used for the Ref-plan and cone-beam CT acquired during treatments (Rot-CT) were registered. The HyperArc plans involving rotational setup errors (Rot-plan) were generated by re-calculating doses based on the Rot-CT. The dosimetric parameters between the two plans were compared. RESULTS: The dosimetric parameters [D99% , D95% , D1% , homogeneity index, and conformity index (CI)] for the single-metastasis cases were comparable (P > 0.05), whereas the D95% for each PTV of the Rot-plan decreased 10.8% on average, and the CI of the Rot-plan was also significantly lower than that of the Ref-plan (Ref-plan vs Rot-plan, 0.93 ± 0.02 vs 0.75 ± 0.14, P < 0.01) for the multiple-metastases cases. In addition, for the multiple-metastases cases, the Rot-plan resulted in significantly higher V10Gy (P = 0.01), V12Gy (P = 0.02), V14Gy (P = 0.02), and V16Gy (P < 0.01) than those in the Ref-plan. CONCLUSION: The rotational setup errors for multiple brain metastases cases caused non-negligible underdosage for PTV and significant increases of V10Gy to V16Gy in SRS with HyperArc.

Feasibility of virtual starshot analysis providing submillimeter radiation isocenter accuracy: A long-term multi-institutional analysis.

PURPOSE: We developed a technique to calculate the offset between room lasers and the radiation isocenter using a digital Winston-Lutz (WL) test with a starshot technique. We have performed isocenter localization quality assurance (QA) with submillimeter accuracy for a long period. Here we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of this virtual starshot (VS) analysis for isocenter localization QA. METHODS: A 6-MV photon beam with a square multileaf collimator field was used to irradiate a WL sphere positioned at the intersection of the room lasers. Images were acquired using an electronic portal imaging device. A four-field WL test was performed, and the path of each beam was calculated from the offset between the beam and sphere. Virtual starshot analysis was used to analyze the radiation isocenter, which calculates the center of the beam paths by using a least-squares method, similar to the starshot analysis. Then, eight coplanar and 12 noncoplanar beams were irradiated to evaluate isocenter localization accuracy. RESULTS: Several VS analyses, using different WL spheres, were performed at three institutions, and the calculated accuracies were within 0.1 mm at all institutions. Long-term analysis showed that the isocenter localization accuracy was appropriately managed with three-dimensional accuracy within ± 0.5 mm for 90 months after the first laser adjustments. The offset between each beam and the room laser was within 0.6 mm and within 1.0 mm for eight coplanar and 12 noncoplanar beams, respectively, for 90 months. Cone-beam computed tomography images, acquired after verification beams, showed that the offset between the radiation isocenter and the imaging center was within 0.66 mm for 90 months. The isocenter localization accuracy within 1 mm was kept for long period at other four institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term analysis showed the feasibility of VS analysis for isocenter localization QA, including room laser re-alignment, noncoplanar irradiation verification, and image guidance accuracy.

Comparison of gamma index based on dosimetric error and clinically relevant dose-volume index based on three-dimensional dose prediction in breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Measurement-guided dose reconstruction has lately attracted significant attention because it can predict the delivered patient dose distribution. Although the treatment planning system (TPS) uses sophisticated algorithm to calculate the dose distribution, the calculation accuracy depends on the particular TPS used. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the gamma passing rate (GPR) and the clinically relevant dose-volume index based on the predicted 3D patient dose distribution derived from two TPSs (XiO, RayStation). METHODS: Twenty-one breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were inversely optimized using XiO. With the same plans, both TPSs calculated the planned dose distribution. We conducted per-beam measurements on the coronal plane using a 2D array detector and analyzed the difference in 2D GPRs between the measured and planned doses by commercial software. Using in-house software, we calculated the predicted 3D patient dose distribution and derived the predicted 3D GPR, the predicted per-organ 3D GPR, and the predicted clinically relevant dose-volume indices [dose-volume histogram metrics and the value of the tumor-control probability/normal tissue complication probability of the planning target volume and organs at risk]. The results derived from XiO were compared with those from RayStation. RESULTS: While the mean 2D GPRs derived from both TPSs were 98.1% (XiO) and 100% (RayStation), the mean predicted 3D GPRs of ipsilateral lung (73.3% [XiO] and 85.9% [RayStation]; p < 0.001) had no correlation with 2D GPRs under the 3% global/3 mm criterion. Besides, this significant difference in terms of referenced TPS between XiO and RayStation could be explained by the fact that the error of predicted V5Gy of ipsilateral lung derived from XiO (29.6%) was significantly larger than that derived from RayStation (- 0.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GPR is useful as a patient quality assurance to detect dosimetric errors; however, it does not necessarily contain detailed information on errors. Using the predicted clinically relevant dose-volume indices, the clinical interpretation of dosimetric errors can be obtained. We conclude that a clinically relevant dose-volume index based on the predicted 3D patient dose distribution could add to the clinical and biological considerations in the GPR, if we can guarantee the dose calculation accuracy of referenced TPS.

Do the representative beam data for TrueBeam™ linear accelerators represent average data?

If the vendor's representative beam data (RBD) for TrueBeam linear accelerators are to be valid for use in clinical practice, the variations in the beam data used for beam modeling must be small. Although a few studies have reported the variation of the beam data of the TrueBeam machines, the numbers of machines analyzed in those studies were small. In this study, we investigated the variation in the beam data for 21 TrueBeam machines collected from 17 institutions with their agreement. In the exponential regions, the percent depth dose (PDD) values showed very small variation, <1% for all the photon energies analyzed. Similarly, the off-center ratio (OCR) values also showed small variation for all energies. In the field regions, the standard deviations of the values of dose difference (DD) between the data for each machine and the study average were <1% for field sizes ≥100 × 100 mm2 . The maximum distance-to-agreement from the average data was <0.5 mm in the penumbra regions. The output factor (OPF) values also showed very small variation (<1%) for all energies and field sizes. Both the PDD and OCR of the average study data showed good agreement with the vendor's RBD for field sizes ≥100 × 100 mm2 . The OPF of the average study data also showed good agreement with the vendor's RBD for all field sizes. However, although all the institutions used ionization chambers with similar cavity volumes, the 30 × 30 mm2 field size showed large DD variations (≥2%) in OCR in the field regions. We conclude that the intermachine variability of TrueBeam linear accelerators was very small except for small field dosimetry, supporting the validity of the use of the RBD for clinical applications. The use of the vendor's RBD might greatly facilitate the quick installation of a new linear accelerator.

A new plan quality objective function for determining optimal collimator combinations in prostate cancer treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy with CyberKnife for prostate cancer has long treatment times compared with conventional radiotherapy. This arises the need for designing treatment plans with short execution times. We propose an objective function for plan quality evaluation, which was used to determine an optimal combination between small and large collimators based on short treatment times and clinically acceptable dose distributions. Data from 11 prostate cancer patients were used. For each patient, 20 plans were created based on all combinations between one small (⌀ 10-25 mm) and one large (⌀ 35-60 mm) Iris collimator size. The objective function was assigned to each combination as a penalty, such that plans with low penalties were considered superior. This function considered the achievement of dosimetric planning goals, tumor control probability, normal tissue complication probability, relative seriality parameter, and treatment time. Two methods were used to determine the optimal combination. First, we constructed heat maps representing the mean penalty values and standard deviations of the plans created for each collimator combination. The combination giving a plan with the smallest mean penalty and standard deviation was considered optimal. Second, we created two groups of superior plans: group A plans were selected by histogram analysis and group B plans were selected by choosing the plan with the lowest penalty from each patient. In both groups, the most used small and large collimators were assumed to represent the optimal combination. The optimal combinations obtained from the heat maps included the 25 mm as a small collimator, giving small/large collimator sizes of 25/35, 25/40, 25/50, and 25/60 mm. The superior-group analysis indicated that 25/50 mm was the optimal combination. The optimal Iris combination for prostate cancer treatment using CyberKnife was determined to be a collimator size between 25 mm (small) and 50 mm (large).

Inter-institutional variability of small-field-dosimetry beams among HD120™ multileaf collimators: a multi-institutional analysis.

Detector selection and technical problems can result in large variations in small-field-dosimetry data among institutions. In this study, we evaluated inter-institutional variability in the small-field-beam data of the Novalis Tx linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems and BrainLAB) with an HD120™ multileaf collimator. Beam data for modeling an iPLAN treatment planning system (BrainLAB) were collected from 19 institutions and median values of percentage depth doses (PDD), diagonal profiles, transversal profiles, and ratios of detector readings (detector output factors; OF det) were calculated. Inter-institutional variability was defined as the difference between the median value and the value for each machine. PDD measured with a 100 mm square field size and diagonal profiles showed only small variations; however, when measured with a 5 mm square field size, the PDD variation from the median exceeded ±2%, especially for ionization chambers. With a 10 mm square field, the variation was within approximately ±1%. The OF det variation was within ±2% for ⩾20 mm square field sizes. The maximum variation exceeded 20% for 5 mm square fields. The ionization chambers' OF det values were smaller than the median, whereas those for the EDGE detector (Sun Nuclear Corp) were larger. When the OF det values were corrected by output factor correction factors, the variation was greatly reduced, with only a few machines showing variations greater than ±5% from the median value. In conclusion, this multi-institutional investigation of small field dosimetry for HD120 multileaf collimators demonstrated some large variations in the dosimetric parameters, especially for a 5 mm square field size. Most differences were detector-dependent, and the variation was reduced when output correction factors were applied. However, variations probably due to measurement errors were also observed, indicating that careful management is needed for small-field dosimetry.

Mechanical performance of a commercial knowledge-based VMAT planning for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study clarified the mechanical performance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for prostate cancer generated with a commercial knowledge-based treatment planning (KBP) and whether KBP system could be applied clinically without any major problems with mechanical performance. METHODS: Thirty consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent VMAT using extant clinical plans were evaluated. The mechanical performance and dosimetric accuracy of the single optimized KBPs, which were trained with other 51 clinical plans, were compared with the clinical plans. The mechanical performance metrics were mean field area (MFA), mean asymmetry distance (MAD), cross-axis score (CAS), closed leaf score (CLS), small aperture score (SAS), leaf travel (LT), modulation complexity score (MCSv), and monitor unit (MU). The γ passing rates were evaluated with ArcCheck and EBT3 film. RESULTS: The mean mechanical performance metrics (clinical plan vs. KBP) were as follows: 18.28 cm2 vs. 17.25 cm2 (MFA), 21.08 mm vs. 20.47 mm (MAD), 0.54 vs. 0.55 (CAS), 0.040 vs. 0.051 (CLS), 0.20 vs. 0.23 (SAS5mm), 458.5 mm vs. 418.8 mm (LT), 0.27 vs. 0.27 (MCSv), and 618.2 vs. 622.1 (MU), respectively. Significant differences were observed for CLS and LT. The average γ passing rates (clinical plan vs. KBP) were as follows: 99.0% vs. 99.1% (3%/3 mm) and 92.4% vs. 92.5% (2%/2 mm) with ArcCHeck, and 99.5% vs. 99.4% (3%/3 mm) and 95.2% vs. 95.4% (2%/2 mm) with EBT3 film, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The KBP used lower multileaf collimator (MLC) travel and more closed or small MLC apertures than the clinical plan. The KBP system of VMAT for the prostate cancer was acceptable for clinical use without any major problems.

Dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion under a tumour-tracking system in hypofractionated robotic radiosurgery.

For CyberKnife-mediated prostate cancer treatment, a tumour-tracking approach is applied to correct the target location by acquiring X-ray images of implanted fiducial markers intermittently. This study investigated the dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion during CyberKnife treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients treated using the CyberKnife (35 Gy delivered in five fractions). Using log files of recorded prostate motion, the intra-fraction prostate motion was simulated. We defined the worst-case intra-fraction prostate motion as the difference between pre- and post-deviation on log files and shifted structure sets according to the corresponding offsets for each beam. The dose-volume indices were calculated and compared with the original plan in terms of clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (CTV plus a 2-mm margin), rectum, bladder, and urethra. Prostate motions of >3, >5, and >10 mm were observed for 31.3, 9.1, and 0.5% of the 1929 timestamps, respectively. Relative differences between the simulated and original plans were mostly less than 1%. Although significant decreases were observed in D50% and D98% of the target, absolute dose differences were <0.1 Gy compared with the planned dose. The dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion may be small even with longer treatment durations, indicating that the tumour tracking using the CyberKnife could be a robust system for examining prostate motion.