Effect of Orthopedics Promotional Activities on Multidisciplinary Management of Patients with Bone Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The rapid aging of the Japanese population is leading to an increase in the number of patients with bone metastases. Since 2014, our orthopedics department has promoted multidisciplinary hospital activities, including offering lectures to hospital staff on multidisciplinary approaches for bone metastases and holding regular cancer board meetings on bone metastases. This study investigated whether these activities were effective in promoting multidisciplinary approaches and improving outcomes of patients with bone metastasis. METHODS: To investigate the effects of changes in medical practice on patients with bone metastases, we compared patient clinical characteristics after (January 2014 through December 2017) and before the start of the activities (January 2011 through December 2013). RESULTS: The semiannual numbers of first-visit, referral, and orthopedic surgical patients, the number of patients with slower growing primary cancers, and the number of patients with milder pain were significantly higher post-activity than pre-activity. The number of patients without paralysis was higher after the start of the activity than before the activity, but the difference was not significant. Survival after the first visit to the orthopedics department was significantly longer after the start of the activity than before the activity. CONCLUSIONS: The potential demand for a multidisciplinary approach to bone metastases is high, and orthopedic specialists should actively participate in this approach.

Symptoms Related to Moderate Skeletal-Related Events as Clues for the Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of bone metastasis is difficult. The aim of the present study was to determine whether symptoms related to skeletal-related events (SREs) can be used for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in the absence of screening tests. METHODS: We reviewed 81 patients with bone metastasis to evaluate their SREs at diagnosis. SREs were arbitrarily classified as moderate or severe. Moderate SREs included radiation to the bone before pathological fracture or paralysis, bone surgery before pathological fracture or paralysis, and hypercalcemia without dialysis. Severe SREs included pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia necessitating dialysis. RESULTS: The complication rates of SREs at the time the bone metastasis was diagnosed were 59.3% and 24.7% for severe and moderate SREs, respectively, and only 16.0% of cases were uncomplicated. The clinical factors that showed a significant relationship with the severity of SREs were age and history of malignancy. However, there was no significant relationship between the complication rate of total SREs and the presence or absence of a malignancy history (83.3% vs. 85.2%, respectively, p=0.83). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that symptoms related to SREs can be used to diagnose bone metastasis in the absence of a screening test. Bone metastasis should be diagnosed as often as possible based on symptoms related to moderate SREs and should be treated as soon as possible before patients develop severe SREs.

Development and Verification of Educational Material for Plain Radiographic Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis: A Preliminary Report.

Our previous studies showed that early diagnosis of painful bone metastasis is difficult and requires improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography during an initial patient consultation. In this preliminary study, we evaluate the usefulness of educational material used to improve diagnosis of bone metastasis with plain radiography. This study included imaging data from 129 consecutive patients who visited our orthopedic clinic during the period January 2011 through December 2014. First, we prepared a test to measure the reading ability of orthopedic practitioners, after which the educational material was created. Then, the effectiveness of the educational material was verified by having orthopedic trainees take a pre-test and post-test. The test contained plain radiographic data from 12 patients with lesions and 6 without lesions. The educational material included plain radiographic data from 30 patients with typical findings of bone metastasis, as well as diagnostic magnetic resonance images or computed tomography scans, accompanied by a lecture. The accuracy and sensitivity of diagnosis significantly improved after the lecture; however, specificity decreased. Although the educational material was effective for improving the ability of orthopedic trainees to read plain radiographs of bone metastasis, some aspects of the program need to be improved and revised.

Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis in Patients Without a History of Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing bone metastasis in patients without a history of cancer remains challenging. Diagnostic evaluation may be prolonged owing to difficulties in distinguishing between bone metastasis and common orthopedic diseases. We hypothesized that bone metastasis due to occult cancer would be more difficult to diagnose than bone metastasis in patients with a history of cancer. Few studies exist on the difficulty of diagnosing bone metastasis in patients without a history of cancer. Therefore, we reviewed the clinical course of patients with bone metastasis between January 2011 and December 2014. METHODS: We reviewed patients with bone metastasis to determine the diagnostic rate at first visit, period from symptom-onset to first visit, period from first visit to diagnosis, and presence of severe skeletal-related events at diagnosis, and compared these between 27 patients without a history of cancer (Group A) and 54 patients with a history of cancer (Group B). RESULTS: The diagnostic rate at first visit was significantly lower (11.5% vs. 52.4%, p=0.00069), the period from first visit to diagnosis was significantly longer (median, 7 weeks vs. 3 weeks, p=0.018), and the presence of severe skeletal-related events at diagnosis was significantly higher (81.4% vs. 50.0%, p=0.05) in patients without a history of cancer compared with those with a history of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that it is difficult to diagnose bone metastasis in patients without a history of cancer. This must be considered in the early diagnosis of bone metastasis to prevent severe skeletal-related events.

Diagnostic Value of Plain Radiography for Symptomatic Bone Metastasis at the First Visit.

BACKGROUND: To prevent and minimize skeletal-related diseases, early diagnosis of bone metastases is important. However, previous reports have shown that plain radiography has low sensitivity and fails to screen multiple asymptomatic lesions. Limited investigations have been reported on the value of plain radiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastases. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of plain radiography for symptomatic bone metastasis. METHODS: Two experienced orthopedic surgeons retrospectively evaluated the plain radiographs of 39 patients with symptoms during their first visit between 2011 and 2014 for bone metastases. Another 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons then reviewed the data using 2 reference standards, the clinical results and the retrospectively evaluated results, in a blinded manner. The data were then reviewed by 2 certified orthopedic surgeons and 7 orthopedic surgeons in training with differing years of experience in a blinded manner. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastasis using plain radiography at the clinic first visit was 71.4%. Upon blinded evaluation, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 55.8%, 54.3%, and 68.8% and 77.6%, 73.0%, and 85.7% for clinical results and results from 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons as a reference standard, retrospectively. There was a strong and significant correlation between the accuracy and observers' years of experience in orthopedic surgery among the orthopedic surgeons in training (R=0.942, p=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Plain radiography around the time of the first visit has a definitive role in the early diagnosis of symptomatic bone metastasis.

Challenges in the Diagnosis of bone Metastasis in Patients without a History of Malignancy at Their First Clinic Visit.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with bone metastases whose diagnoses came only after they had suffered aggravated conditions are still frequently encountered. However, there have been few studies regarding the early diagnosis of such metastases. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of cases we experienced between 2004 and 2014 to clarify the practical situation of diagnosis of such bone metastases. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of 56 of our patients with bone metastasis who had no history of malignancy at their first visit, who visited our departments between 2004 and 2014. The initial diagnoses at the first visit to any clinic, the period from the first visit to any clinic to diagnosis of bone metastasis, the process to make the diagnosis, the frequency of severe skeletal-related events at diagnosis, and the examination serving as the basis for diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: The diagnosis of bone metastasis was made at the first visit in only 6 of the 56 patients. Pathological fractures, paralysis and/or calcemia were seen in 62.5% of the patients at diagnosis of bone metastasis. The median period from the first visit to any clinic to diagnosis was 7.0 weeks. Typically, the diagnosis of bone metastasis was made only after aggravation. The most frequent examination to serve as the basis of diagnosis was magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of bone metastasis is challenging in patients without a history of malignancy at their first visit. For early diagnosis, it is important to recognize this challenge and to keep it in mind together with ongoing observation.

Anomalous Andreev bound state in noncentrosymmetric superconductors.

We study edge states of noncentrosymmetric superconductors where spin-singlet d-wave pairing mixes with spin-triplet p (or f)-wave one by spin-orbit coupling. For d(xy)-wave pairing, the obtained Andreev bound state has an anomalous dispersion as compared to conventional helical edge modes. A unique topologically protected time-reversal invariant Majorana bound state appears at the edge. The charge conductance in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor junctions reflects the anomalous structures of the dispersions, particularly the time-reversal invariant Majorana bound state is manifested as a zero bias conductance peak.