Endothelin-1 genetic polymorphism as predictive marker for bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer.

Biomarkers for bevacizumab efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are of urgent need. The genetic variability of genes involved in angiogenesis could explain the interpatient variability of drug effects. For this biomarker study DNA was extracted from tumor blocks or blood samples of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (bevacizumab cohort, 163 patients) or chemotherapy only (control cohort, 105 patients). We assessed the correlation of 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes modulating angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1), serine threonine kinase 39 (STK39)) or hypertension (endothelin-1 and uromodulin) with outcome and toxicity. In the bevacizumab cohort, the SNP rs5370-TT in endothelin-1 (EDN1) showed a significantly shorter median overall survival (OS, 6.3 vs 21.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 2.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-6.26; log-rank P=0.0069) and a trend toward worse median progression-free survival (3.5 vs 7.9 months; HR 2.05, 95% CI 0.96-4.39; log-rank P=0.065) compared with the alternate genotypes combined. Similarly, patients harboring the VEGF-936 (rs3025039) TT alleles showed a significantly shorter median OS than patients with VEGF-936 CC or CT (14.9 vs 21.3 months; HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.09-5.13; P=0.0286). In multivariate analysis including important clinical parameters like disease-free survival (DFS), adjuvant chemotherapy, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score, histologic subtype, grade, hormone receptor status, visceral metastases and treatment line, only the association of rs5370 (EDN1) with OS was still statistically significant (P=0.012). In the control cohort, no association of the EDN1 genotype with outcome was seen, suggesting a predictive value for bevacizumab. In conclusion, the SNP rs5370 in endothelin-1 could help identifying patients who unlikely gain any benefit from bevacizumab.

Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) plus adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 48- and 62-month follow-up in the ABCSG-12 trial. We present efficacy results of a final additional analysis after 94.4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were premenopausal women who had undergone primary surgery for stage I/II estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive breast cancer with <10 positive lymph nodes, and were scheduled for standard goserelin therapy. All 1803 patients received goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days) and were randomized to tamoxifen (20 mg/days) or anastrozole (1 mg/days), both with or without ZOL (4 mg every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was DFS; recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS: After 94.4-month median follow-up (range, 0-114 months), relative risks of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.99; P = 0.042] and of death (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.02; P = 0.064) are still reduced by ZOL although no longer significant at the predefined significance level. Overall, 251 DFS events and 86 deaths were reported. Absolute risk reductions with ZOL were 3.4% for DFS and 2.2% for OS. There was no DFS difference between tamoxifen alone versus anastrozole alone, but there was a pronounced higher risk of death for anastrozole-treated patients (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.05-1.45; P = 0.030). Treatments were generally well tolerated, with no reports of renal failure or osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION: These final results from ABCSG 12 suggest that twice-yearly ZOL enhances the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine treatment, and this benefit is maintained long-term. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00295646 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=00295646).

Epirubicin and docetaxel with or without capecitabine as neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III study (ABCSG-24).

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase III trial compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of early breast cancer (EBC) following neoadjuvant epirubicin-docetaxel (ED)±capecitabine (C), and evaluated the addition of trastuzumab in HER2-positive tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with invasive breast cancer (except T4d) were randomly assigned to receive six 3-weekly cycles of ED (both 75 mg/m2)±C (1000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-14). Patients with HER2-positive disease were further randomized to receive trastuzumab (8 mg/kg, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or not. Primary end point: pCR rate at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients were randomized to ED (n=266) or EDC (n=270); 93 patients were further randomized to trastuzumab (n=44) or not (n=49). pCR rate was significantly increased with EDC (23.0% versus 15.4% ED, P=0.027), and nonsignificantly further increased with trastuzumab (38.6% EDC versus 26.5% ED, P=0.212). Rates of axillary node involvement at surgery and breast conservation were improved with EDC versus ED, but not significantly; the addition of trastuzumab had no further impact. Hormone receptor status, tumor size, grade, and C (all P≤0.035) were independent prognostic factors for pCR. Trastuzumab added to ED±C significantly increased the number of serious adverse events (35 versus 18; P=0.020), mainly due to infusion-related reactions. CONCLUSION: These findings show that the integration of C into a neoadjuvant taxane-/anthracycline-based regimen is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option, with incorporation of trastuzumab in HER2-positive disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00309556, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.

BACKGROUND: PAM50 is a 50-gene test that is designed to identify intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and generate a Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score. It has been developed to be carried out in qualified routine hospital pathology laboratories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand four hundred seventy-eight postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (EBC) treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen followed by anastrozole from the prospective randomized ABCSG-8 trial were entered into this study. Patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks and analyzed using the PAM50 test. Both intrinsic subtype (luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, basal-like) and ROR score were calculated. The primary analysis was designed to test whether the continuous ROR score adds prognostic value in predicting distant recurrence (DR) over and above standard clinical variables. RESULTS: In all tested subgroups, ROR score significantly adds prognostic information to the clinical predictor (P<0.0001). PAM50 assigns an intrinsic subtype to all cases, and the luminal A cohort had a significantly lower ROR at 10 years compared with Luminal B (P<0.0001). Significant and clinically relevant discrimination between low- and high-risk groups occurred also within all tested subgroups. CONCLUSION(S): The results of the primary analysis, in combination with recently published results from the ATAC trial, constitute Level 1 evidence for clinical validity of the PAM50 test for predicting the risk of DR in postmenopausal women with ER+ EBC. A 10-year metastasis risk of <3.5% in the ROR low category makes it unlikely that additional chemotherapy would improve this outcome-this finding could help to avoid unwarranted overtreatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ABCSG 8: NCT00291759.

The predictive impact of body mass index on the efficacy of extended adjuvant endocrine treatment with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer: an analysis of the randomised ABCSG-6a trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) can be used as a predictive parameter indicating patients who benefit from extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. METHODS: The ABCSG-6a trial re-randomised event-free postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive patients from the ABCSG-6 trial to receive either 3 additional years of endocrine therapy using anastrozole vs nil. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI on disease outcome and safety. RESULTS: In all, 634 patients (177 normal weight, 307 overweight, and 150 obese) patients were included in this analysis. Normal weight patients with additional 3 years of anastrozole halved their risk of disease recurrence (disease-free survival (DFS) HR 0.48; P=0.02) and death (HR 0.45; P=0.06) and had only a fifth of the risk of distant metastases (HR 0.22; P=0.05) compared with normal weight patients without any further treatment. In contrast, overweight+obese patients derived no benefit from additional 3 years of anastrozole (DFS HR 0.93; P=0.68; distant recurrence-free survival HR 0.91; P=0.78; and OS HR 0.9; P=0.68). The possible predictive impact of BMI on extended endocrine treatment could be strengthened by a Cox regression interaction model between BMI and treatment (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Body mass index may be used to predict outcome benefit of extended AI treatment in patients with receptor-positive breast cancer.

Efficacy of tamoxifen ± aminoglutethimide in normal weight and overweight postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an analysis of 1509 patients of the ABCSG-06 trial.

BACKGROUND: There exists evidence that body mass index (BMI) impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. The relationship between BMI and the efficacy of tamoxifen is conflicting. We investigated the impact of BMI on the efficacy of single tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus an aromatase inhibitor in the well-defined prospective study population of the ABCSG-06 trial. METHODS: ABCSG-06 investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen vs tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Taking BMI at baseline, patients were classified as normal weight (BMI=18.5-24.9 kg m(-)(2)), overweight (BMI=25-29.9 kg m(-)(2)), and obese (30 kg m(-)(2)) according to WHO criteria. RESULTS: Overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 1.51; Cox P=0·018) and a worse overall survival (OS; HR: 1·49; Cox P=0·052) compared with normal weight patients. Analysing patients treated with single tamoxifen only, no difference between overweight+obese patients and normal weight patients regarding distant recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.35; Cox P=0·24) and OS (HR: 0.99; Cox P=0·97) could be observed. In contrast, in the group of patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide, overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (1.67; Cox P=0·03) and a worse OS (1.47; Cox P=0·11) compared with normal weight patients. CONCLUSION: BMI impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor-based treatment but not single tamoxifen.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, docetaxel and capecitabine combination therapy for HER2/neu-negative invasive breast cancer: Efficacy and safety in a phase II pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the triplet combination of bevacizumab, capecitabine and docetaxel (XTA) as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with invasive, HER2-negative, nonmetastatic breast cancer (T2-4c >2cm) and no prior systemic therapy received six 21-day cycles of XTA (bevacizumab 15mg/kg, day 1, cycles 1-5; docetaxel 75mg/m(2), day 1 of each cycle; capecitabine 950mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days of each cycle). Patients underwent surgery 2-4 weeks after completing XTA, followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone therapy according to institution guidelines. Pathologic complete response (pCR), the primary endpoint, was defined as no evidence of invasive tumour in the final surgical sample. Secondary endpoints included rates of clinical response and breast-conserving surgery and safety. RESULTS: Median age of the 18 enrolled patients was 48 years (range 34-69). Most patients (72%) received six cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. pCR rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6-48). Nine of the patients without pCR achieved clinical partial response, giving a 72% overall clinical response rate (95% CI: 47-90). Fifteen patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (83%; 95% CI: 59-96). One additional patient had breast-conserving surgery, followed by mastectomy 1 month later. The remaining 2 patients underwent modified radical mastectomy. XTA was reasonably well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The 22% pCR rate in a HER2-negative population suggests that addition of bevacizumab increases the activity of neoadjuvant capecitabine-docetaxel. Further evaluation of this regimen in early breast cancer is recommended.

A prospective randomised trial to study the role of levamisole and interferon alfa in an adjuvant therapy with 5-FU for stage III colon cancer.

The purpose of this trial was to examine the efficacy of the addition of levamisole (LEV) or interferon alfa (IFN) to an adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with stage III colon cancer. According to a 2 x 2 factorial study design, 598 patients were randomly assigned to one of four adjuvant treatment arms. Patients in arm one received 5-FU weekly for 1 year, patients in arm two 5-FU plus LEV, in arm three 5-FU plus IFN and patients in arm four 5-FU, LEV and IFN. The relative risk of relapse and the relative risk of death were significantly higher for patients treated with LEV compared with those without LEV treatment (HR 1.452, 95% CI 1.135-1.856, P=0.0028; HR 1.506, 95% CI 1.150-1.973, P=0.0027, respectively). No significant impact on survival was observed for therapy with IFN in the univariate analysis. The addition of LEV to adjuvant 5-FU significantly worsened the prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer. Interferon alfa had no significant influence on survival when combined with adjuvant 5-FU, but increased the toxicity of therapy substantially.

Phase II study of single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (PLD) in metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment failure.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit and the toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 30) who failed a prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease received 45 mg/m2 pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) every 4 weeks following prophylactic administration of metoclopramide (10 mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg). RESULTS: 29 of 30 patients were assessed for clinical benefit and time to progression. All patients were assessed for toxicity and analysis of overall survival. 9 patients (31%) had a partial response, and 16 patients (55%) responded with stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 86% (n = 25). Median time to progression was 4 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2), median duration of response was 7 months (95% CI: 4.7-8.2), and median survival was 12 months (95% CI: 6.7-17.2). Skin toxicity was the most common adverse event (30%, all < or = grade 2). Other toxicities were remarkably low in occurrence. CONCLUSION: PLD is a well-tolerated, second-line monotherapy with a high rate of clinical benefit.

Randomised trial: One cycle of anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy compared with six cycles of CMF treatment in node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients.

AIM: A randomised, controlled clinical trial was initiated in 1984 to test whether 1 cycle of anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of breast cancer patients presenting with stage II disease and negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PgR), as compared with 6 cycles of dose-reduced CMF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within 7 years 263 women with stage II breast cancer were randomised either to receive 1 cycle of doxorubicin, vinblastine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5- fluorouracil (AV-CMF) or to receive 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were stratified for tumour stage, nodal stage, menopausal status, type of surgery and participating centre. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 100 months, neither disease-free (DFS) nor overall survival (OS) differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 6 cycles of a non-standard low-dose CMF regimen 1 cycle of anthracycline- containing adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the outcome in women with stage II receptor-negative breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS.

Randomized trial of low-dose chemotherapy added to tamoxifen in patients with receptor-positive and lymph node-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome in patients with stage II hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated or not treated with low-dose, short-term chemotherapy in addition to tamoxifen in terms of disease-free and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 613 patients were randomized to receive either low-dose chemotherapy (doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2) and vincristine 1 mg/m(2) on day 1; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m(2); methotrexate 25 mg/m(2); and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on days 29 and 36 intravenously) or no chemotherapy in addition to 20 mg of tamoxifen orally for 2 years. A third group without any treatment (postmenopausal patients only) was terminated after the accrual of 79 patients due to ethical reasons. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 7.5 years, the addition of chemotherapy did not improve the outcome in patients as compared with those treated with tamoxifen alone, neither with respect to disease-free nor overall survival. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for disease-free survival revealed menopausal status, in addition to nodal status, progesterone receptor, and histologic grade as significant. Both untreated postmenopausal and tamoxifen-treated premenopausal patients showed identical prognoses significantly inferior to the tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal cohort. Prognostic factors for overall survival in the multivariate analysis showed nodal and tumor stage, tumor grade, and hormone receptor level as significant. CONCLUSION: Low-dose chemotherapy in addition to tamoxifen does not improve the prognosis of stage II breast cancer patients with hormone-responsive tumors. Tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal patients show a significantly better prognosis than premenopausal patients, favoring the hypothesis of a more pronounced effect of tamoxifen in the older age groups.

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin with or without interferon-alpha-2c in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: final results of a randomised phase III study.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced colorectal carcinoma, although response rates are generally less than 20%. Improved therapeutic efficacy has been reported using biochemical modulation of 5-FU by leucovorin (LV) or interferon alpha (IFN), the combination of 5-FU/LV frequently considered as standard therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. In an attempt to enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU, a prospective randomised trial was initiated to compare 5-FU/LV with 5-FU/LV plus IFN. Patients were randomised to receive either LV, 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), followed by 5-FU, 500 mg/m2 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, daily for 4 days, followed by weekly infusions until week 8, or the same regimen of 5-FU/LV plus IFN-alpha-2c, 30 micrograms subcutaneously (s.c.), three times weekly. Cycles were repeated after a 2-week rest period. Among 269 enrolled patients, 219 were available for response and 243 for toxicity. An objective tumour response was observed in 38 of 107 (36%) and 28 of 112 (25%) patients in the treatment arms with and without IFN, respectively (difference not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups in response duration (median 8.4 versus 12.1 months), time to treatment failure (median 6.5 versus 4.9 months), or overall survival (median 10.0 versus 12.6 months). However, patients in the IFN arm experienced significantly more haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity and more frequent alopecia. In conclusion, the addition of IFN to 5-FU/LV in the schedules and doses used in the study did not provide any clinical benefit over 5-FU/LV alone and cannot be recommended for routine use in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

[Therapy studies of the Austrian Breast Cancer Group (ABC)]. / Die Therapiestudien der Austrian Breast Cancer Group (ABC).

The Austrian Breast Cancer Group (ABC) consisting of more than 60 participating centers in Austria has randomized more than 5800 patients in 11 randomized trials since 1984. At present, roughly 30% of all patients with the diagnosis primary breast cancer are accrued in protocols throughout the country. Due to specific activities, the breast conservation rate raised from an initial 20% to more than 60% in the last years. Multicenter trials are not only the basis for progress in medicine but also tools for quality control and quality improvement.