ABSTRACT
Objective: To complete a review of the literature on patient experience and satisfaction as relates to the potential for virtual triage (VT) or symptom checkers to enhance and enable improvements in these important health care delivery objectives. Methods: Review and synthesis of the literature on patient experience and satisfaction as informed by emerging evidence, indicating potential for VT to favorably impact these clinical care objectives and outcomes. Results/Conclusions: VT enhances potential clinical effectiveness through early detection and referral, can reduce avoidable care delivery due to late clinical presentation, and can divert primary care needs to more clinically appropriate outpatient settings rather than high-acuity emergency departments. Delivery of earlier and faster, more acuity level-appropriate care, as well as patient avoidance of excess care acuity (and associated cost), offer promise as contributors to improved patient experience and satisfaction. The application of digital triage as a front door to health care delivery organizations offers care engagement that can help reduce patient need to visit a medical facility for low-acuity conditions more suitable for self-care, thus avoiding unpleasant queues and reducing microbiological and other patient risks associated with visits to medical facilities. VT also offers an opportunity for providers to make patient health care experiences more personalized.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This review examines the literature on improving clinician satisfaction with a focus on what has been most effective in improving experience from the perspective of clinicians, and the potential role that virtual triage (VT) technology can play in delivering positive clinician experiences that improve clinical care, and bring value to health care delivery organizations (HDOs). Methods: Review and synthesis of evidence on clinician satisfaction indicating a potential for VT to favorably impact clinician experience, sense of effectiveness, efficiency, and reduction of administrative task burden. Analysis considers how to conceptualize and the value of improving clinician experience, leading clinician dissatisfiers, and the potential role of VT in improving clinician experience/satisfaction. Results: Contributors to poor clinician experience/satisfaction where VT could have a beneficial impact include better managing resource limitations, administrative workload, lack of care coordination, information overload, and payer interactions. VT can improve clinician experience through the technology's ability to leverage real-time actionable data clinicians can use, streamlining patient-clinician communications, personalizing care delivery, optimizing care coordination, and better aligning digital/virtual services with clinical practice. From an organizational perspective, improvements in clinician experience and satisfaction derive from establishing an effective digital back door, increasing the clinical impact of and satisfaction derived from telemedicine and virtual care, and enhancing clinician centricity. Conclusions: By embracing digital transformation and implementing solutions such as VT that focus on improving patient and clinician experience, HDOs can address barriers to delivery of high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective care. VT is a digital health tool that can create a more streamlined and satisfying experience for clinicians and the patients they care for. VT is a technology solution that can help clinicians make faster more informed decisions, reduces avoidable care, improves communication with patients and within care teams, and lowers their administrative burden so they have more quality time to care for patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To describe the use patterns, impact and derived patient-user value of a mobile web-based virtual triage/symptom checker. Methods: Online survey of 2,113 web-based patient-users of a virtual triage/symptom checker was completed over an 8-week period. Questions focused on triage and care objectives, pre- and post-triage care intent, frequency of use, value derived and satisfaction with virtual triage. Responses were analyzed and stratified to characterize patient-user pre-triage and post-triage intent relative to triage engine output. Results: Seventy-eight percent of virtual triage users were female, and 37% were 18-24 years old or younger, 28% were 25-44, 16% were 45-54, and 19% were 55 years or older; 41.2% completed the survey from the U.S., 12.5% from the U.K., 9.1% from Canada, 5.6% from India, 3.8% from South Africa. Motivations were to determine need to consult a physician (44.2%), to secure medical advice without visiting a physician (21.0%), and to confirm a diagnosis received (14.2%). Forty-three percent were first time users of virtual triage, 36.6% utilized a triage engine at least once every few months or more often. Pre-triage, 40.5% did not know what level of healthcare they were planning to utilize, 33.9% stated they intended to seek a physician consultation, 23.7% engage self-care and 1.8% seek emergency care. Virtual triage recommended 56.8% of patient-users consult a physician, 33.8% seek emergency care and 9.4% engage self-care. In three-fourths, virtual triage helped users decide level of care to pursue. Among 74.1%, triage recommended care different than pre-triage intentions. Post-triage, those who remained uncertain of their care path decreased by 25.4%. Patient-user experience and satisfaction with virtual triage was high, with 80.1% stating that they were highly likely or likely to use it again, and interest in and willingness to use telemedicine doubled. Conclusion: Virtual triage successfully redirected patient-users who initially planned to seek an inappropriate level of care acuity, reduced patient uncertainty of care path, and doubled the percentage of patients amenable to telemedicine and virtual health engagement. Patient-users were highly satisfied with virtual triage and the virtual triage patient experience, and a large majority will use virtual triage recurrently in the future.