Efficacy and Safety of Shenfu Injection on Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The adjunctive efficacy and safety of Shenfu Injection (SFI) for acute heart failure (AHF) still remains ambiguous even though previous studies made initial conclusions. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the adjunctive efficacy and safety of SFI in the treatment of AHF. STUDY DESIGN: This was a meta-analysis and systematic review. METHODS: 8 databases were searched for qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from May 1990 to May 2022. The primary results included total clinical effective rate (TCER) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The secondary results included left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), heart rate (HR), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and adverse events (AE). The quality evaluation, meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and publication bias were conducted by RevMan5.3 software. Meta-regression analysis was conducted using Stata software 15.0, and trial sequential analyses (TSA) was performed by TSA program. Finally, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system was applied for evaluating the quality of evidence. RESULTS: 61 RCTs containing 5505 AHF patients were included. The meta results demonstrated SFI combined with conventional western treatment (CWT) for AHF was superior to CWT alone in improving the TCER (RR = 1.21; 95% CI (1.18, 1.24); p < 0.001), improving LVEF (SMD = 0.85; 95% CI (0.77,0.92); p < 0.001) and reducing HR (SMD = -0.67; 95% CI (0.80, -0.54) p < 0.001). It had a lower AE rate in the SFI+CWT group (27/753, 3.59%) than the CWT group (68/739, 9.20%) (RR = 0.40; 95% CI (0.26, 0.61); p < 0.001). The outcomes' evidentiary quality of TCER, HR, LVEF and AE were assessed as moderate. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of SFI was safer to improve TCER and heart function of AHF, but the results should be interpreted with cautious for clinical practice until high quality-designed RCTs were require for further confirmation due to poor quality of part of the included studies.

Efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection for the treatment of post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the adjuvant effect and safety of Shenfu injection (SFI) on the treatment of post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure (PAMIHF). Methods: Seven databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) associated with SFI and PAMIHF treatment from May 1990 to May 2022. Primary outcomes included NT-proBNP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and secondary outcomes included total effective rate, BNP, heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and adverse event (AE). The risk of bias evaluation was assessed by the ROB2 tool, meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were conducted by RevMan5.3 software, and the Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence of meta results. Results: A total of 36 studies with 3231 PAMIHF patients were included. The meta results suggested that adjuvant SFI therapy was superior to conventional medical therapy alone. It improved the total effective rate [RR = 1.33; 95% CI (1.25.1.40); p < 0.00001], increased LVEF [SMD = 0.98; 95% CI (0.71, 1.24); p < 0.00001], and decreased HR [SMD = -1.14; 95% CI (-1.28, -0.99); p < 0.00001]. In addition, adjuvant SFI therapy (9.73%, 66/678) had a rate of AE lower than that of conventional medical therapy alone (21.7%, 147/677) when regarding safety [RR = 0.45; 95% CI (0.35, 0.57); p < 0.00001]. The quality of the evidence for the outcomes was rated from "very low" to "moderate." Conclusion: Adjuvant SFI therapy was safer to improve the total effective rate and the heart function of PAMIHF patients. However, well-designed RCTs were needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjuvant SFI therapy in PAMIHF treatment due to the low quality of the evidence for the outcomes caused by a small sample size and unclear risk of bias existed in included studies. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=151856), identifier CRD42020151856.