Does hospitalization for asthma and allergic diseases occur more frequently in Ramadan fasting: a population based study (2000-2004).

OBJECTIVE: Over one billion Muslims fast worldwide during the month of Ramadan. Fasting during Ramadan is a radical change in life style for the period of a lunar month. Our objective in this study was to investigate whether Ramadan fasting has any effect on the incidence of asthma and to assess whether Ramadan Fasting affected normal lung function values. DESIGN: This is a hospital-based cohort study. SETTING: Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, State of Qatar. PATIENTS: We prospectively reviewed 1590 asthmatic Muslim patients who were hospitalized with asthma over a four year period from January 2000 to December 2004. Patients were divided according to the time of presentation in relation to the month of Ramadan, one month before, during and one month after Ramadan. METHODS: Pulmonary function tests were performed on an electronic spirometer (Compact Vitalograph, Buckingham, U.K.). Performance of the spirometric test and data collection were according to as described by the American Thoracic Society. RESULTS: There were 1590 patients studied. Among them, 901 were males (56.7%) and 689 were females (43.3%). Their mean age was 30 years (15-60). All patients expressed clinical allergy, 454 patients (28.6%) had asthma and rhinitis, 513 patients (32.3%) had allergic rhinitis, 300 patients (18.9%) had asthma alone and 10.6% had other allergic conditions. The ventilatory capacity of lung function parameters mean did not show any statistically significant differences between a period of pre-Ramadan, during Ramadan and after Ramadan concerning FVC, FEV1, FEF(25-75) FEV1/FVC, and PEF values. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that no significant difference was found in number of hospitalization and the mean spirometric values for asthma while fasting during the month of Ramadan when compared to the non-fasting months.

Pet ownership: its effect on allergy and respiratory symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that pets are very important sensitizing agents in patients with asthma. Respiratory disorders such as asthma and allergic rhinitis are common in the State of Qatar. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether exposure to pets and domestic animals plays a significant role in the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis among Qatari population. DESIGN: A hospital-based prospective descriptive study conducted. SETTING: Allergy Laboratory at the Hamad General Hospital and Hamad Medical Corporation, State of Qatar. PATIENTS: Adult patients over 12 years of age diagnosed with bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhintis who were referred for allergy skin prick test. 1106 adult patients recruited with respiratory diseases of suspected allergic origin who attended Allergy Clinic at the Hamad General Hospital, during three years from January 2001 to April 2003. Total of 1106 whom 607 were females (54.9 %) and 499 were males (45.1%) and their mean was age 30 years (12-48). METHODS: Skin Prick Test (SPT) was performed on 1106 patients for common allergens whom the blood sample was taken for measuring total IgE concentration. RESULTS: There were 1106 patients studied and 496 patients (44.9%) had positive and 610 (55.1%) had negative skin prick tests. Out of 1106 patients, 311 patients (28.1%) had asthma; 503 patients had allergic rhinitis (45.5%) and 87 patients (7.8%) had skin allerg. Three hundred and forty (340/1106=30.7%) of the 1006 subjects studied had at least one animal at home, and the remaining 69.3% had never had pets in the home. A further 12% reported having had pets in the past, but not anymore. Cats (26.7%), goats (15%) and birds (14.7%), animals were the most common present within the house and was the most frequently seen pet types when compared to other pet types. The risk of having asthma (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07-1.55; p=0.008), allergic rhinitis (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.24-1.77; p<0.0001) and eczema (RR: 3.56; 95% CI:1.24-1.77; p<0.0001) was significantly higher in subjects with animals than in patients without. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the prevalence of asthma, rhinitis, and skin allergy was significantly more common in families with animals than in those without.