ABSTRACT
Background/purpose: Establishing effective irrigation methods is warranted to ensure the predictability of minimally invasive root canal instrumentation. This study aimed to compare the smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in root canals instrumented with TruNatomy nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Materials and methods: Experiment 1: Extracted human mandibular incisors were instrumented using TruNatomy Shaping Files up to Small (#20/0.04), Prime (#26/0.04), or Medium (#36/0.03) (n = 17, each) and irrigated with EDTA, NaOCl, and again with EDTA using syringe irrigation (SI). Experiment 2: Extracted mandibular incisors were instrumented using TruNatomy Small and irrigated with EDTA and NaOCl as in Experiment 1, using (1) conventional laser-activated irrigation (LAI) with an erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser unit at 30 mJ/10 Hz (LAI 30/10) or 70 mJ/20 Hz (LAI 70/20), (2) photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) (20 mJ/15 Hz), (3) ultrasonic-activated irrigation, or (4) SI (n = 13 each). Five additional canals served as negative controls (no irrigation). The smear layer on the canal wall was scored under scanning electron microscopy. Results: In Experiment 1, the TruNatomy Small group exhibited significantly higher smear layer scores compared to the other groups in the apical and middle thirds. In Experiment 2, the LAI 70/20 and PIPS groups demonstrated significantly lower smear layer scores compared to the LAI 30/10 and SI groups in the apical third. Conclusion: Conservative instrumentation using the TruNatomy Small reduced the cleaning efficacy of irrigation. However, PIPS performed satisfactory for smear layer removal without injury to the root canal wall.
ABSTRACT
Background/purpose: Intracanal fractured instruments hamper adequate root canal disinfection. The aim of this study was to evaluate vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument. Materials and methods: Sixty curved root canal models, in which a 3-mm fragment of a #20 K-file or a WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) instrument was intentionally separated at 3 mm from the apical foramen, were irrigated with laser-activated irrigation with photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (LAI-PIPS; 20 mJ/15 Hz), laser-activated irrigation using an Er:YAG laser unit (LAI; 30 mJ/20 Hz), or ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) for 5 s. Vapor bubble velocity and counts were analyzed using high-speed video imaging. To evaluate canal wall cleanliness, 40 canals of extracted human teeth with an intentionally separated 3-mm WOG fragment in the canal at 3 mm from the apical foramen were irrigated with LAI-PIPS, LAI, UAI or conventional syringe irrigation, using 17% EDTA (30 s, two cycles), saline (30 s), and 3% NaOCl (30 s, three cycles) as irrigants. Debris and smear layer on the apical canal wall beyond the fractured instrument were scored using scanning electron microscopy. Results: LAI-PIPS and LAI demonstrated higher vapor bubble counts than UAI. The WOG fragment permitted higher bubble velocity and count than the K-file fragment. LAI-PIPS and LAI showed better debris and smear removal than the other techniques. Conclusion: LAI and LAI-PIPS demonstrated higher vaporized bubble kinetics and better cleaning efficacy in the apical area, even in the presence of a fractured instrument.
