Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JACC Case Rep ; 9: 101748, 2023 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909274

ABSTRACT

Limited venous access and lateral left ventricular scar are impediments to traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy. We present a case where placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator from a femoral approach while using left bundle branch area pacing led to clinical improvement. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

2.
Heart Rhythm ; 14(10): 1506-1514, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28603001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Device reimplantation after extraction because of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in pacemaker-dependent patients can be challenging in individuals with limited access options. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a straightforward, low lateral thoracic implantation technique for patients with a patent axillary vein but unavailable bilateral pectoral sites. METHODS: Nine pacemaker-dependent patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, 7 male) who underwent CIED extraction and low lateral thoracic reimplantation in whom bilateral pectoral sites were unavailable were included in the study. RESULTS: Extraction was performed a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-13) days before CIED reimplantation (4 dual-chamber, 3 single-chamber, 2 cardiac resynchronization therapy). The new generator was implanted in the low lateral thoracic region ipsilateral to the extracted generator in 7 patients (78%) and contralateral in 2 patients (22%), via a subcutaneous pocket in 6 (67%) and submuscular pocket in 3 (33%). Median procedure duration was 85 (IQR 61-116) minutes, median fluoroscopy time was 7.2 (IQR 5.7-10.9), minutes and median fluoroscopy exposure was 26.0 (IQR 10.0-110.5) mGy. No acute complications occurred. Over median follow-up of 92 (IQR 31-131) days, 1 patient experienced right atrial lead dislodgment (122 days postimplantation) requiring lead revision. No patients experienced recurrent device infection. CONCLUSION: In pacemaker-dependent patients with limited prepectoral and vascular access options, a low lateral thoracic implantation site is a viable alternative to surgical epicardial or femoral pacing systems. This simple implantation technique is a safe and effective option in selected patients who require a single-chamber, dual-chamber, or biventricular pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal/methods , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Pectoralis Muscles/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Replantation/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 2: 35-9, 2008 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19920942

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The misuse of antibiotics is not a harmless practice; rather, it can render future antibiotic treatments ineffective. This study looked to determine patient knowledge and perception of upper respiratory infections and indicated treatment. METHODS: The authors developed and administered a questionnaire to 98 patients visiting affiliated family medicine clinical sites. Participants were selected randomly, either while sitting in the waiting room, or after being seen by the clinician. RESULTS: While more than half the respondents recognized that treatment for colds did not require antibiotics, 70% erroneously indicated that viruses require antibiotic treatment. Additionally, almost 90% of respondents thought that yellow nasal discharge or coughing up yellow mucous requires antibiotic treatment. It was interesting to note that 95% of patients reported satisfaction when advised by their physician that antibiotic treatment wasn't necessary, even if they initially thought they needed antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers have the greatest opportunity to curb inappropriate antibiotic use by both prescribing appropriately and educating their patients about proper antibiotic use when indicated.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...