Obesity management from the perspectives of people living with obesity in Canada: A mixed-methods study.

AIMS: To identify and better understand themes related to why people living with obesity (PwO) in Canada may not use professional support and to explore potential strategies to address the challenges. METHODS: One-on-one interviews and online surveys, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, were conducted. A total of 20 PwO were interviewed and a separate group of 200 PwO were surveyed. Results from the interviews guided the development of the survey. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to investigate the association between the theme domain scores of the PwO and their prior experience with obesity management strategies. RESULTS: The 200 PwO surveyed provided representation across Canada and were diverse in age, background and gender. The most prominent domains associated with use of professional support by PwO were: Intention (rs = -0.25; p < 0.01); Social/Professional Role and Identity (rs = -0.15; p < 0.05); and Optimism (rs = -0.15; p < 0.05). For example, PwO without professional support less often reported being transparent in obesity discussions, perceived obesity to be part of their identity, and expected to manage the illness long term. Many PwO hesitated to use various adjunctive therapies due to concerns about affordability, long-term effectiveness, and side effects. CONCLUSION: This study identified contextual, perception and resource considerations that contribute to healthcare decision-making and the use by PwO of professional support to manage obesity, and highlighted key areas to target with interventions to facilitate obesity management. Strategies such as consistent access to healthcare support and educational resources, as well as improved financial support may help PwO to feel more comfortable with exploring new strategies and take control of their healthcare.

Trends in obesity across Canada from 2005 to 2018: a consecutive cross-sectional population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is increasingly prevalent worldwide and is becoming an epidemic in many countries, including Canada. We sought to describe and analyze temporal obesity trends in the Canadian adult population from 2005 through 2018 at the national and provincial or territorial levels. METHODS: We conducted a consecutive, cross-sectional study using data from 7 sequential Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) cycles (2005 to 2017/18). We included data from Canadian adults (age ≥ 18 yr) who participated in at least 1 of the 7 consecutive CCHS cycles and who had body mass index values (calculated by Statistics Canada based on respondents' self-reported weight and height). Obesity prevalence (adjusted body mass index ≥ 30) was a primary outcome variable. We analyzed temporal trends in obesity prevalence using Pearson χ2 tests with Bonferroni adjustment, and the Cochran-Armitage test of trend. RESULTS: We included data from 746 408 (403 582 female and 342 826 male) CCHS participants. Across Canada, the prevalence of obesity increased significantly between 2005 and 2017/18, from 22.2% to 27.2% (p < 0.001). We observed increases across both sexes, all age groups and all Canadian provinces and territories (p < 0.001). In 2017/18, the prevalence of obesity was higher among males than females (28.9% v. 25.4%; p < 0.001); the prevalence among adults aged 40-69 years exceeded 30%. In 2017/18, Newfoundland and Labrador had the highest prevalence (39.4%), and British Columbia had the lowest (22.8%) prevalence of obesity. Over the 14-year study period, Quebec and Alberta exhibited the largest relative increases in obesity. INTERPRETATION: In 2017/18, more than 1 in 4 adult Canadians lived with obesity, and from 2005 to 2017/18, the prevalence of obesity among adults in Canada increased substantially across sexes, age groups and all Canadian provinces and territories to 27.2%. Our findings call for urgent actions to identify, implement and evaluate solutions for obesity prevention and management in all Canadian provinces and territories.

Efficacy of High-Dose Liraglutide as an Adjunct for Weight Loss in Patients with Prior Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective long-term treatment of severe obesity. Unfortunately, many patients experience inadequate weight loss, weight plateau, or weight recidivism. We sought to determine the efficacy of high-dose liraglutide (3.0 mg once daily) in patients with prior bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 33 consecutive patients, aged 18-65, who received liraglutide for weight loss in the setting of any previous bariatric surgery. Indications were weight recidivism (> 10% weight regain from lowest post-surgical weight), inadequate weight loss (< 20% weight loss from initial clinic assessment, or pre-surgical weight if unavailable), and plateau (patient desires further weight loss but does not fit into either other category). Our primary outcomes were median percentage weight loss and median BMI change at 16 and 28 weeks, inclusive of time taken to titrate the medication to target dose. Secondary outcomes were the presence of adverse effects and the need to discontinue the medication. RESULTS: Of a total of 33 patients identified, 20 met inclusion criteria and had adequate data to be included in our analysis. At 16 weeks median percentage weight loss was 7.1% (IQR 5.1-12.2%), and at 28 weeks 9.7% (IQR 7.8-13.9%). Median BMI change was 3.5 kg/m2 (16 weeks, IQR 2.2-4.6 kg/m2) and 4.7 kg/m2 (28 weeks, IQR 3.7-5.6 kg/m2). There were no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose liraglutide is an effective adjunct treatment for weight loss in patients with prior bariatric surgery.

Liraglutide Effects on Upper Gastrointestinal Investigations: Implications Prior to Bariatric Surgery.

Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide type 1 (GLP-1) analogue that is approved for long-term obesity management in North America. While bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for weight loss, an increasing number of patients are on liraglutide in the setting of ongoing workup for bariatric surgery. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms prior to bariatric surgery may prompt testing for dysmotility, which affects surgical decision making. Here we report six cases where treatment with liraglutide was associated with reversible reduction in gastric and esophageal motility in screening for bariatric surgery. While liraglutide is known to delay gastric emptying, there are minimal reports of how this medication affects gastrointestinal investigations used in this context. The implications of these abnormal screening investigations on candidacy for bariatric surgery are discussed.