Does esomeprazole prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting?

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is a potent proton pump inhibitor (PPI), reducing acid production as well as gastric juice volume. This study evaluated the possible beneficial effect of esomeprazole on reducing post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic or open gynaecological surgery, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive three peri-operative doses double blindly of either esomeprazole 40 mg or placebo, given intravenously or orally. All patients were given a standardized anaesthesia regimen including fentanyl and sevoflurane/nitrous oxide. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 284 patients. Demographic data and known PONV risk factors were similar for the two treatment groups. PONV was observed in 77% of patients on esomeprazole vs. 81% on placebo (NS) and rescue antiemetic medication was needed in 56% vs. 53%, respectively (NS). The proportion of patients that vomited during 0-24 h was lower on esomeprazole than placebo (38% vs. 49%; NS), and the mean amount of vomit was significantly lower (52 vs. 86 g; P < 0.05). The use of neostigmine, use of opioids and type of surgery were significant risk factors for PONV (P < 0.05). The 24-h incidence of PONV was 63% after laparoscopic gynaecology, 80% after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 88% after open gynaecological laparotomy, whereas laparoscopic cholecystectomy had the lowest risk when corrected for other risk factors of PONV. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole had no clinically relevant effect on the overall 24-h incidence of PONV. However, esomeprazole significantly reduced the total amount of vomit during 24-h post-operatively. This may be of value in patients with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration.

Daily treatment with esomeprazole is superior to that taken on-demand for maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: On-demand therapy with esomeprazole is effective for long-term treatment of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it has not been evaluated in erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS: To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission over a 6-month period when patients with healed erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are treated with esomeprazole 20 mg, either once daily or on-demand. METHODS: Patients with verified erosive reflux oesophagitis of Los Angeles grades A-D were enrolled. Following 4-8 weeks treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily, those who were endoscopically healed and had symptom control during the last week were randomized to maintenance therapy for 6 months with esomeprazole 20 mg, taken either once daily or on-demand. RESULTS: Of 539 enrolled patients, 494 (91%) were healed at 8 weeks and 477 were randomized to maintenance therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg, 243 once daily and 234 on-demand. After once daily treatment, 81% of patients were still in remission at 6 months, compared with only 58% who took on-demand treatment (P < 0.0001). A difference in remission was found irrespective of baseline grade of oesophagitis, but it was more pronounced for the more severe grades. There was no difference in overall symptomatic remission between the two treatments, although heartburn was significantly more prevalent in the on-demand group. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily esomeprazole 20 mg was better than that taken on-demand for maintaining healed erosive oesophagitis, regardless of baseline Los Angeles grade.

Blood transfusion and recurrence of colorectal cancer.

Because perioperative blood transfusions have been shown to have an impaired effect on survival in patients with colorectal cancer, we examined retrospectively the records of 882 patients who had undergone curative operations: 170 patients had distant metastases at the time of operation. Of the 499 patients with colonic cancer 332 (67%) had received perioperative blood transfusions. The corresponding figure for the 213 patients with rectal cancer was 190 (89%). Colonic tumors recurred in 45% of the patients who received blood transfusions and in 39% of those who did not. Corresponding figures for tumors in the rectum were 54% and 55%. When dividing the patients with colonic cancer into different subgroups according to Dukes' grade we found differences in survival rates. The poorer survival for transfused patients was, however, only significant for those with Dukes' A tumors (p less than 0.05). This difference disappeared when the influence of age was eliminated. The estimated risk ratio of recurrence and death was 1.23 with the 95% confidence interval (0.99, 1.53) when taking Dukes' grade, current age and localization into account. Blood transfusion should be avoided if possible until adequate prospective studies have been carried out.