Atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis in general practice and the open population: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether significant differences exist between the self-reported prevalence of atopic disorders in the open population compared with physician diagnosed prevalence of atopic disorders in general practice. METHODS: Medline (OvidSP), PubMed Publisher, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register databases were systematically reviewed for articles providing data on the prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in a GP setting. Studies were only included when they had a cross-sectional or cohort design and included more than 100 children (aged 0-18 years) in a general practice setting. All ISAAC studies (i.e. the open population) that geographically matched a study selected from the first search, were also included. A quality assessment was conducted. The primary outcome measures were prevalence of eczema, asthma and allergic rhinitis in children aged 0-18 years. RESULTS: The overall quality of the included studies was good. The annual and lifetime prevalences of the atopic disorders varied greatly in both general practice and the open population. On average, the prevalence of atopic disorders was higher in the open population. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between the self-reported prevalence of atopic disorders in the open population compared with physician diagnosed prevalence of atopic disorders in general practice. Data obtained in the open population cannot simply be extrapolated to the general practice setting. This should be taken into account when considering a research topic or requirements for policy development. GPs should be aware of the possible misclassification of allergic disorders in their practice. Key Points Epidemiological data on atopic disorders in children can be obtained from various sources, each having its own advantages and limitations. On average, the prevalence of atopic disorders is higher in the open population. GPs should take into account the possible misclassification of atopic disorders in their practice population. Policymakers should be aware that data obtained in the open population cannot simply be extrapolated to the general practice setting.

Skin tests, T cell responses and self-reported symptoms in children with allergic rhinitis and asthma due to house dust mite allergy.

BACKGROUND: In allergic responses, a distinction is made between an early-phase response, several minutes after allergen exposure, and a late-phase response after several hours. During the late phase, eosinophils and T cells infiltrate the mucosa and play an important role in inflammation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between allergen-induced late-phase skin responses and in vitro T cell reactivity. In addition, the relationship between allergen-induced skin or T cell responses and the severity of self-reported symptoms was studied in children with house dust mite allergy. METHODS: A total of 59 house dust mite-allergic children (6-18 years) were recruited in general practice. These children or their parents rated their nasal and asthma symptoms on diary cards during 1 month. Allergen skin tests were performed and read after 15 min (early phase) and 6 h (late phase). Allergen-specific T cell proliferation was determined, and Th2 cytokine (IL-5 and IL-13) secretion was analysed. RESULTS: The size of the late-phase skin response correlated with in vitro T cell proliferation (r(s)=0.38, P=0.003) but not with Th2 cytokine secretion (r(s)=0.16, P=0.2 for both IL-5 and IL-13). Moreover, the late-phase skin response and T cell proliferation correlated with asthma symptoms (r(s)=0.30, P=0.02 for skin response and r(s)=0.28, P=0.03 for T cell proliferation) but not with nasal symptoms (r(s)=0.19, P=0.15 for skin response and r(s)=0.09, P=0.52 for T cell proliferation). The early-phase skin response correlated with the nasal symptom score (r(s)=0.34, P=0.01) but not with asthma symptom scores (r(s)<0.005, P=0.97). CONCLUSION: In this study, the late-phase skin test response correlated with in vitro T cell proliferation but not with Th2 cytokine secretion. We found weak or no correlations between late-phase skin responses and symptoms of asthma or rhinitis in children with house dust mite allergy. This suggests that late-phase skin responses reflect certain T cell properties but are of limited value for the evaluation of airway symptoms in atopic children.

Differential suppression of dendritic cell cytokine production by anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Various anti-inflammatory drugs are available for the treatment of skin disorders. In these diseases, untoward immune responses to endogenous and/or environmental antigens are initiated by maturation and polarization of dendritic cells (DC). OBJECTIVE: To explore the suppressive effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on DC maturation and, in particular, polarization. METHODS: Exposure of DC to nickel in vitro results in DC maturation and secretion of both type 1 and type 2 cytokines, thereby providing a model to study the effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on DC responses. The inhibitory effects of anti-inflammatory drugs (ciclosporin, dexamethasone, diclofenac, dimethylfumarate, hydrocortisone, lactoferrin, 1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) on DC maturation (CD83, CD86, HLA-DR, CXCL8) and polarization (type 1: IL-12p70, TNF-alpha; type 2: IL-10, CCL17) were studied. RESULTS: All anti-inflammatory drugs, except for lactoferrin, had inhibitory effects on DC maturation. Hydrocortisone and dexamethasone exclusively suppressed the release of type 1 cytokines. A less pronounced, but similar profile was observed for dimethylfumarate and 1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Ciclosporin suppressed both type 1 and 2 cytokines. In contrast, diclofenac suppressed only type 2 DC cytokine secretion. CONCLUSION: The present results give more insight into the pharmacological effects of immunosuppressive drugs on the immune system, and can thereby contribute to a more rational selection of anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders.

Regulation of nickel-induced T-cell responsiveness by CD4+CD25+ cells in contact allergic patients and healthy individuals.

In this study, we investigated the capacity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells to suppress nickel-specific effector T cells, both in nickel-allergic patients and healthy controls. CD4+ cells isolated from allergic patients showed an increased proliferative response to nickel, whereas CD4+ cells from negative controls did not respond to allergen. When CD4+CD25+ cells were depleted, nickel-specific responsiveness was strongly increased both in allergic and in non-allergic individuals, with the most pronounced effect in allergic patients. These regulatory T cells were anergic to nickel but inhibited nickel-specific CD4+CD25- effector T cells in coculture experiments. CD4+CD25+ cells from nickel-allergic patients showed only a limited capacity to suppress effector T-cell responsiveness, because an increased nickel reactivity could still be detected in these cocultures. None of the isolated CD4+CD25+ cells, either isolated from healthy controls or allergic patients, produced IL-10 in response to nickel. Overall, these results support the view that CD4+CD25+ cells can control the activation of nickel-specific effector T cells in non-allergic individuals, whereas this regulatory capacity is impaired in allergic patients. To investigate the presence of allergen-specific regulatory T cells in truly naïve, non-sensitized individuals, T-cell reactivity should also be studied with non-environmental contact allergens, such as para-phenylenediamine.

Nickel-responding T cells are CD4+ CLA+ CD45RO+ and express chemokine receptors CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR10.

BACKGROUND: Whereas T lymphocytes are widely accepted as effector cells determining the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis, contradictory results have been found regarding the roles of different T-cell subsets. The use of various experimental models, involving long-term cultured T-cell lines or clones, may explain these contradictory results. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of distinct T-cell subsets in patients with nickel contact allergy. METHODS: Different T-cell subsets were directly isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of nickel-allergic patients, and their proliferative capacity, type-1 or type-2 cytokine secretion [measured by interferon (IFN)-gamma or interleukin (IL)-5 release] and phenotypical marker expression were analysed after stimulation with nickel. RESULTS: Only CD4+ CLA+ CD45RO+ and not CD8+ T cells proliferate and produce both type-1 (IFN-gamma) and type-2 (IL-5) cytokines in response to nickel. Moreover, cells expressing the marker CLA in combination with CD4, CD45RO or CD69 are increased after nickel-specific stimulation. Interestingly, in addition, CD45RA+ CLA+ cells showed an increased frequency after allergen-specific stimulation. Analysis of nickel-reactive T cells for expression of distinct chemokine receptors showed that both proliferative capacity and cytokine production are restricted to subsets expressing CXCR3, CCR4 but not CCR6. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of chemokine receptors expressed on nickel-stimulated T cells confirmed these results; a subset of T cells expressing CLA and CXCR3, CCR4 and, most importantly, CCR10 increased in response to allergen, while these CLA+ nickel-reactive T cells were all negative for CCR6. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that freshly isolated nickel-reactive T cells can be characterized as CD4+ CLA+ memory T cells which express the chemokine receptors CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR10, but not CCR6.

Identification of anti-inflammatory drugs according to their capacity to suppress type-1 and type-2 T cell profiles.

BACKGROUND: Down-regulation or modulation of T cell activity by immunosuppressive drugs is an effective treatment in diseases where exaggerated T cell responses play a role. A primary effect of the anti-inflammatory drugs (AIDs) is inhibition of the synthesis of growth factors, such as IL-2, thereby down-regulating T cell proliferation. However, it is still largely unknown to what extent these AIDs are able to down-regulate specifically type-1 or type-2 T cell cytokine production, and whether they can down-modulate chemokine receptor expression, thereby preventing migration of T cells to the site of inflammation. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the suppressive effect of dermatologically used AID (cyclosporin A (CsA), lactoferrin (LF), 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (VD(3)), hydrocortisone (HC), di-methyl-fumarate (DMF), diclofenac (DF)) on both type-1 and type-2 T cells. Since allergic contact dermatitis is a skin disorder in which an exaggerated T cell response of both types of T cell subsets can be observed, we used this disorder as a model to study the capacity of AID to suppress type-1 or type-2 T cell responses. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of nickel allergic patients were cultured in the presence of allergen and increasing concentrations of AID. Proliferation was determined by measuring (3)H thymidine incorporation; chemokine receptor (CCR10, CCR4, CXCR3) expression was studied by flow cytometric analysis and IFN-gamma or IL-5 cytokine production was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Three major patterns can be distinguished regarding the effect of AID on T cell responses. The first group, including CsA and LF, inhibited non-selectively T cell proliferation, chemokine receptor expression and cytokine production, with CsA as the most potent drug tested. A second group of AID, which included VD(3), HC and DMF, suppressed mainly type-1 T cell responses, as revealed by strong interference with IFN-gamma production and CXCR3 expression, and limited effects on either or both IL-5 and CCR4 expression. The third pattern was displayed by DF, which down-regulated IL-5 production and CCR4 expression, whereas IFN-gamma and CXCR3 were unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: Using a contact allergy model, we have demonstrated that various AIDs show distinct pharmacological profiles in that either type-1 or type-2 or both T cell responses are suppressed. These results should contribute to a more rational selection of AID in treating inflammatory skin diseases mediated by either or both of these T cell subsets.