ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Evidence and gap maps (EGMs) can be used to identify gaps within specific research areas and help guide future research agendas and directions. Currently, there are no EGMs within the broad domain of chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in adults. The aim of this study was to create a contemporary EGM of interventions and outcomes used for research investigating chronic MSK pain. This EGM was based on systematic reviews of interventions published in scientific journals within the past 20 years. Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were used to retrieve studies for inclusion. The quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-II. Interventions were categorised as either physical, psychological, pharmacological, education/advice, interdisciplinary, or others. Outcomes were categorised using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) recommendations. Of 4299 systematic reviews, 457 were included. Of these, 50% were rated critically low quality, 25% low quality, 10% moderate quality, and 15% rated high quality. Physical interventions (eg, exercise therapy) and education were the most common interventions reported in 80% and 20% of the studies, respectively. Pain (97%) and physical functioning (87%) were the most reported outcomes in the systematic reviews. Few systematic reviews used interdisciplinary interventions (3%) and economic-related outcomes (2%). This contemporary EGM revealed a low proportion of high-quality evidence within chronic MSK pain. This EGM clearly outlines the lack of high-quality research and the need for increased focus on interventions encompassing the entire biopsychosocial perspective.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Musculoskeletal Pain , Adult , Humans , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Pain Measurement , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal positioning of a large-bore chest tube is in the part of the pleural cavity that needs drainage. It is recommended that the chest tube be positioned apically in pneumothorax and basally for fluids. However, targeted chest tube positioning to a specific part of the pleural cavity can be a challenge. METHODS: A new medical device, the KatGuide, was developed for accurate guiding of a chest tube (28F) to an intended part of the pleural cavity. The primary end point of this randomized, controlled trial was optimal position of the chest tube. The optimal position in pneumothorax was apical (above the aortic arch), and the optimal position in hemothorax, hydrothorax, chylothorax, or empyema was basal (2 cm above the diaphragm or lower). The patients were randomized for the KatGuide method or the conventional forceps method, and rates of optimal position were compared. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled (KatGuide: n = 49; conventional: n = 60). Chest tubes were optimally position in 41 (84%) in the KatGuide group vs 32 (53%) in the conventional group (p = 0.001). Experienced operators (>50 previous chest tube insertions) inserted 39 of the chest tubes, of which, 15 of 17 (88%) were optimally positioned in the KatGuide group vs 11 of 22 (50%) in the conventional group (p = 0.02). Two chest tubes (4%) were misplaced in the KatGuide group vs 11 (18%) in the conventional group (p = 0.04). No adverse device effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The KatGuide significantly improves the probability of optimal chest tube position and reduces the risk of misplacement compared with the conventional method. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration Number: NCT01522885.
