Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Phys ; 112(2): 207-213, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027163

ABSTRACT

The health physics profession was born abruptly when once rare and precious radioactive materials became commonplace. The technological advancements that triggered an industrial complex and ended World War II demanded radiation safety on an unprecedented scale. Until then, protective measures against radiation were largely absent in laboratories. Over the subsequent decades, health physicists began protecting people and the environment in a wide range of settings including medical, research, and industrial. The use of radioactive materials and radiation-generating devices is prevalent today. Radiation doses occur continuously including during airline flights, in our homes, during medical procedures, and in energy production. Radiation is integral to numerous applications including those in medicine, dentistry, manufacturing, construction, scientific research, nuclear electric power generation, and oil and gas exploration. Activities that were once groundbreaking have now become routine and scripted. At higher doses, health effects are understood and avoided. Instruments for the detection and measurement of radiation are at times smarter than their users. Ironically, the same health physics community that has been successful in demonstrating that exposures to radiation and to radioactive materials can be effectively managed is shrinking at an increasingly rapid rate. This paper highlights the creation of past and current jobs, predicts the future opportunities in the profession, and makes recommendations necessary to protect the disappearing specialties.


Subject(s)
Health Physics/economics , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Marketing of Health Services/economics , Marketing of Health Services/trends , Radiation Protection/economics , Career Choice , Employment/economics , Employment/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Health Workforce/trends , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , United States
2.
Health Phys ; 95(1): 14-9, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18545025

ABSTRACT

Approximately two years after promulgation of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Office of Compensation and Analysis Support selected a contractor team to perform many aspects of the radiation dose reconstruction process. The project scope and schedule necessitated the development of an organization involving a comparatively large number of health physicists. From the initial stages, there were many technical and managerial challenges that required continuous planning, integration, and conflict resolution. This paper identifies those challenges and describes the resolutions and lessons learned. These insights are hopefully useful to managers of similar scientific projects, especially those requiring significant data, technical methods, and calculations. The most complex challenge has been to complete defensible, individualized dose reconstructions that support timely compensation decisions at an acceptable production level. Adherence to applying claimant-favorable and transparent science consistent with the requirements of the Act has been the key to establishing credibility, which is essential to this large and complex project involving tens of thousands of individual stakeholders. The initial challenges included garnering sufficient and capable scientific staff, developing an effective infrastructure, establishing necessary methods and procedures, and integrating activities to ensure consistent, quality products. The continuing challenges include maintaining the project focus on recommending a compensation determination (rather than generating an accurate dose reconstruction), managing the associated very large data and information management challenges, and ensuring quality control and assurance in the presence of an evolving infrastructure. The lessons learned concern project credibility, claimant favorability, project priorities, quality and consistency, and critical path project activities.


Subject(s)
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Occupational Exposure , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries , Total Quality Management/methods , Humans , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Risk Assessment , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Total Quality Management/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...