Proarrhythmic proclivity of left-stellate ganglion stimulation in a canine model of drug-induced long-QT syndrome type 1.

BACKGROUND: Left-stellate ganglion stimulation (LSGS) can modify regional dispersion of ventricular refractoriness, promote triggered activity, and reduce the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (VF). Sympathetic hyperactivity precipitates torsades de pointes (TdP) and VF in susceptible patients with long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1). We investigated the electromechanical effects of LSGS in a canine model of drug-induced LQT1, gaining novel arrhythmogenic insights. METHODS: In nine mongrel dogs, the left and right stellate ganglia were exposed for electrical stimulation. ECG, left- and right-ventricular endocardial monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and pressures (LVP, RVP) were recorded. The electromechanical window (EMW; Q to LVP at 90% relaxation minus QT interval) was calculated. LQT1 was mimicked by infusion of the KCNQ1/IKs blocker HMR1556. RESULTS: At baseline, LSGS and right-stellate ganglion stimulation (RSGS) caused similar heart-rate acceleration and QT shortening. Positive inotropic and lusitropic effects were more pronounced under LSGS than RSGS. IKs blockade prolonged QTc, triggered MAP-early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and rendered the EMW negative, but no ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred. Superimposed LSGS exaggerated EMW negativity and evoked TdP in 5/9 dogs within 30 s. Preceding extrasystoles originated mostly from the outflow-tracts region. TdP deteriorated into therapy-refractory VF in 4/5 animals. RSGS did not provoke TdP/VF. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of drug-induced LQT1, LSGS readily induced TdP and VF during repolarization prolongation and MAP-EAD generation, but only if EMW turned from positive to very negative. We postulate that altered mechano-electric coupling can exaggerate regional dispersion of refractoriness and facilitates ventricular ectopy.

Pharmacological prevention and termination of focal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Patients undergo ablation for focal atrial fibrillation (AF) as a result of failure of anti-arrhythmic drugs. Our basic studies have implicated cholinergic and adrenergic neurotransmitter release as the underlying mechanism for focal AF. Therefore, we tested the efficacy of a combination of sodium channel-blocking agents with additional vagolytic properties and a ß-blocker to terminate and prevent focal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 Na-pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs, after a right or left thoracotomy, acetylcholine (Ach, 0.5 cc, 100 mM) was injected into a fat pad containing ganglionated plexi (GP) or applied on an atrial appendage (AA) to induce focal firing at the pulmonary veins (PVs) or AA, respectively. Disopyramide (2-4 mg/kg, n= 6) or quinidine (3-6 mg/kg, n= 12) combined with esmolol or propranolol (1 mg/kg, n= 13 and 5, respectively) were slowly injected to terminate (Group I, n= 12) or prevent (Group II, n= 6) Ach-induced sustained focal AF. In another four dogs, only the sodium channel-blocking agents with additional vagolytic properties or only the ß-blocker was injected prior to or after the initiation of focal AF. At baseline, the mean duration of AF induced by Ach was 26 ± 4 min. Group I: After drugs, Ach-induced AF duration was 3 ± 1 min (P< 0.001). Group II: Prior to drugs, Ach-induced AF lasted for 19 ± 3 min. With the drug combination the duration of Ach-induced AF, decreased to 6 ± 1/min, P< 0.001. Either quinidine or propranolol alone did not change the duration of Ach-induced AF, mean 25 ± 10 min compared with Ach alone, 28 ± 16 min, P= 0.2. CONCLUSIONS: Type IA (cholinergic antagonist) plus Type II (ß-adrenergic antagonist) provides significant prevention and suppression of focal AF arising at PV and non-PV sites.