Sleep difficulties, pain and other correlates.

A multiple regression analysis was used with variables relevant to sleeping problems from a large community health survey in South Australia. The variables that were found to be most strongly correlated with sleep problems were, in order of importance, pain, anxiety, age, somatic health and annual household income, all of which accounted for 22% of the variance. Weight problems, depression and sex of the respondent were not so important in this analysis. Arthritis, which often increases with age, appeared to be most strongly associated with pain, explaining in part why sleeping problems increase with age. Anxiety, pain and poor somatic health were most strongly associated with lying awake at night or sleeping badly, and anxiety and pain were most strongly correlated with taking longer to get to sleep. Poor somatic health and anxiety were most strongly associated with waking early, and age and pain were the most important variables in taking tablets to aid sleep.

Mental health in marriage: the roles of need for affiliation, sensitivity to rejection, and other factors.

This study reports on the associations between a number of personality factors and spouse mental health, happiness, and communication (N = 78). Lower Affiliative Drive and higher Sensitivity to Rejection emerge in this sample as being associated in wives (but not husbands) with increased psychological morbidity. Wives had higher levels of both Need for Affiliation and Sensitivity to Rejection than husbands, which possibly may lead to higher internal conflict for them. Although causality cannot necessarily be assumed, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that wives' mental health is more "relationship related" than that of husbands.

Factorial structure of the aftermath of suicide instrument.

Initial factor-analytic studies of the Aftermath of Suicide Instrument suggested that there may be four broad areas of social reaction to suicide. In a replication study, this 25-item questionnaire was administered to a community sample of 54 persons aged between 21 and 77 years. Factor analysis of their responses identified five factors, but only one of these was similar to any of the original factors. This marked variation is probably due to differences in the population sampled, with the present group of respondents more heterogeneous. While the content of the Aftermath of Suicide Instrument remains valid, it appears that its factorial structure requires further clarification. This is consistent with the emotional and clinical complexities of the subject of suicide.