[Transvaginal access for NOTES]. / NOTES über den transvaginalen Zugang.

NOTES ("natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery") has the potential to optimize minimally invasive surgery. In gynecology there is extensive experience with the transvaginal approach to the abdominal cavity. It is easy to perform, closure is safe and there is little risk of infection. Hence, this is the approach most suitable for NOTES. By means of rigid laparoscopic instruments cholecystectomy can be routinely performed. Such operations could be performed in 149 patients in our hospital and the NOTES register of the DGAV has data on more than 900 transvaginal operations.

Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been tested in the animal model for a multitude of procedures including cholecystectomy. Clinical experience using flexible endoscopes is, however, very limited. Transvaginal cholecystectomy has been shown to be the most feasible approach in which rigid instruments can be used. We report our experience in all patients treated over a 1-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2007 and June 2008, 68 patients (mean age 50 years) underwent transvaginal cholecystectomy with an additional 5-mm umbilical trocar using rigid laparoscopic instruments. Data about symptoms, operation, and postoperative course were prospectively collected, as were findings of a gynecological follow-up examination 1 week after surgery and the results of an interview at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: All 68 operations were finished successfully without conversion, with a mean operation time of 51 minutes; in three additional cases severe pelvic adhesions prevented further transvaginal progress. There were no intraoperative or immediately postoperative complications, but one patient presented with a Douglas pouch abscess 3 weeks after surgery. Gynecologic follow-up exams 1 week after surgery were unremarkable. All patients were interviewed 3-10 months after surgery and had no abdominal or gynecological complaints including in relation to sexual intercourse. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy with rigid instruments can be safely and effectively performed in daily routine.

[Combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach for cholecystectomy with no visible scarring]. / NOTES--Cholezystektomie ohne sichtbare Narben. Kombinierter transvaginaler und transumbilikaler Zugang.

The use of natural orifices for operations in the abdominal cavity (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, or NOTES) could be a conclusive development in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Early in the 1990s we had experiences with posterior colpotomy for removal of specimens in laparoscopic surgery. This is why we use the transvaginal approach in NOTES and combine it with a trocar hidden in the umbilicus. With this technique we could perform cholecystectomy without a visible scar. The operation could become routine also because of the use of our well-known rigid optics and instruments. From June 2007 until April 2008 we operated on 57 patients using this method. All operations finished successfully, and the mean operation time was 54 min. There was one complication. An abscess in the Douglas room had to be evacuated laparoscopically. All other postoperative courses were uneventful. After a minimum follow-up of 3 months, none of the patients had symptoms in the vagina or during sexual intercourse.

Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has dramatically improved surgical care of patients reducing postoperative pain, wound infection rate, hospital stay, inability to work, risk of hernia, and cosmetic result. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is even less traumatic to the abdominal wall and might further improve minimal invasive surgery of patients, but might also increase surgical risk when used by a transgastric or transcolonic approach with flexible endoscopes. Therefore we decided to use a transvaginal approach using rigid laparoscopic instruments for cholecystectomies. METHODS: Through a 5-mm incision deep in the umbilicus a pneumoperitoneum was created. The optic and a dissector were inserted through the posterior fornix of the vagina under laparoscopic control from the umbilicus and a transvaginal gallbladder removal was performed. RESULTS: 20 patients were successfully operated in a 4.5-month period. Operating time was 62 (35-100) min. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred in any patient. Gynecological examination after 8 days showed no negative findings and the cosmetic result was ideal with no visible scars. CONCLUSION: In our series we showed that cholecystectomies can be routinely performed in a NOTES technique without visible scar. The transvaginal approach is the safe in NOTES and common laparoscopic instruments can be used as long as there are no better flexible endoscopes for this purpose.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.

Laparoscopic surgery has decreased trauma and improved results and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) should be a further step in this direction. However the use of flexible gastroscopes in the abdomen is difficult and the generally chosen transgastric approach is not without risk. Therefore we have carried out a cholecystectomy with a combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach, using laparoscopic instruments. The optic and a dissector were inserted in the posterior fornix of the vagina, and a 5-mm trocar was inserted deep in the umbilicus. After dissection the gallbladder was removed through the vagina. The operation was done without problems within 85 minutes and left no visible scar. The postoperative course was uneventful. In NOTES the transvaginal approach has important advantages over the transgastric method (e. g. regarding sterilization and closure); standard laparoscopic instruments can be used whilst there are no flexible endoscopes that are easier to handle.