Coronary Orbital Atherectomy Through Newly Deployed Left Main Coronary Stent.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex, calcified coronary lesions can be assisted with orbital atherectomy (OA). OA is generally avoided when there are lesions amendable to OA distal to a newly deployed stent due to the risk of device-stent interaction, burr entrapment, and stent avulsion. We present a case documenting the successful passage of an OA system through a recently deployed left main stent to prepare a chronically occluded left anterior descending for PCI.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Outcomes in Patients With Cancer at a Single Tertiary Center.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients with underlying malignancy. Patients with cancer have a higher risk of bleeding, and at the same time, carry an elevated risk of thromboembolism related to the hypercoagulable state, type of cancer, and anticancer treatment, rendering safe anticoagulation challenging in this population. Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative treatment option in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, the data on patients with cancer are limited. Our study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in patients with cancer receiving left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device. This is a prospective, single-center study comparing outcomes in 389 patients who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device over 5 years in a single, large academic hospital in the United States. The postprocedural outcomes of mortality, stroke, and major bleeding were evaluated in patients with and without cancer. Our study included 57 patients with cancer and 332 without cancer. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Metastatic disease was present in 16.4% of patients, and 25% were receiving active treatment at the time of the procedure. The median follow-up time was 354 (interquartile range 85 to 790) days. There was no difference in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.35, p = 0.38), major bleeding episodes (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.33, p = 0.68), and stroke (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.21, p = 0.49) at 3 years after the procedure in patients with and without cancer. There was no difference in the composite outcome (postprocedural mortality, stroke, and major bleeding) between the 2 groups (HR 1.25, CI 0.75 to 2.07, p = 0.38). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with cancer appears to be safe and has a similar long-term risk compared with patients without cancer.

Delayed Pericardial Effusion Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Though uncommon, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade are serious complications of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). There are few data related to delayed pericardial effusions from this procedure. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective analysis of 369 patients who underwent LAAC from December 2016 to March 2022 at a large teaching hospital. We compared patients who developed effusion (n = 5) to patients who did not (n = 364) to determine if there were any factors that predispose patients to developing acute (AEs) or delayed pericardial effusions (DEs). We compared patient characteristics, procedural data, and complications. Unadjusted, stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients underwent LAAC. Of these, 5 patients (1.4%) developed pericardial effusion. Patients in both groups (pericardial effusion vs non-effusion) had similar patient and procedural characteristics. Patients in both groups were older (mean age, 78.4 ± 7.8 years in the effusion group vs 76.3 ± 8.5 years in the non-effusion group; P=.50) and white (60% in the effusion group vs 90.1% in the non-effusion group). CHA2DS2-VASc (4.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 1.4; P=.67) and HAS-BLED (3.4 ± 0.5 vs 3.7 ± 0.9; P=.53) scores were similar in the effusion group vs the non-effusion group, respectively. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common procedural indication in both groups (80% in the effusion group vs 53.6% in the non-effusion group; P=.23). The majority of the patients in both groups had successful implantation in the first attempt, with the 27-mm device the most commonly used size. There was no significant difference in procedural duration (67 minutes in the effusion group vs 75 minutes in the non-effusion group; P=.16). Among patients who received the Watchman Legacy device, 2 patients developed AEs and no patients had DEs. Of those receiving the Watchman FLX device, 1 patient developed AE and 2 patients developed DEs. All of the patients with effusions had successful recovery. CONCLUSION: In this 5-year, single-center experience, DEs were uncommon and potentially related to LAA device anchor microperforation. No statistically significant risk factors predisposing patients to pericardial effusions were identified in our analysis.

Predictors of successful same-day discharge and 1-year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge (SDD) following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly common but predictors of successful SDD and 1-year clinical outcomes have not been described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore predictors of successful SDD and report 1-year outcomes in patients undergoing LAAC with SDD. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed over a 20-month period of 225 consecutive patients that underwent LAAC in a large, academic hospital. All patients included in the study underwent a SDD protocol. Baseline characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients discharged same day of the procedure versus those that required at least one overnight stay were compared. Adverse events, procedural success, and procedure times were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients (72%) of patients were discharged the same day and 64 patients (28%) required at least an overnight stay (non-SDD: NSDD). NSDD patients were older and more often female. Procedure time was also longer in the NSDD group than in the SDD (63.4 vs. 55.1 min; p = 0.01). While overall procedural success rates were similar between the SDD and NSDD groups (99.4% vs. 98.4%; p = 0.39), NSDD patients had more complications (9.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.01) and higher number of devices per procedure (1.2 vs. 1.0; p = 0.01) as compared to SDD. At 1 year, there were no significant difference between the SDD and NSDD groups in stroke (1.1% vs. 0%; log-rank p = 0.44) and all-cause mortality (3.9% vs. 4.7%; log-rank p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: In this single-center LAAC experience, female sex, older age, and longer procedure duration were associated with higher likelihood for need of overnight stay. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in stroke events and death rates between SDD and NSDD groups.

Novel computed tomography angiography-based sizing methodology for WATCHMAN FLX device in left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND: While there is recent data suggesting an advantage of computed tomography angiography (CTA) over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for preprocedural left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) planning, there is limited published experience for sizing strategies. Device sizing for LAAC may be challenging and noninvasive algorithms that improve this selection process are warranted. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the safety and the feasibility for the implementation of a novel CTA-based sizing methodology for WATCHMAN™ FLX device in a series of patients undergoing LAAC using the TruPlan™ software package. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 136 consecutive patients who underwent LAAC over a 12-month period in a single, large academic hospital in the United States was conducted. CTA-guided preprocedural planning and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed in all. Procedural success, adverse events, length of procedure, number of devices used, and length of stay were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients who underwent LAAC procedure with WATCHMAN™ FLX platform between October 1, 2020 until September 30, 2021 were included. The pre-specified protocol using CTA and ICE was implemented in all patients (100%). Mean CHA2 DS2 VASc score was 4.4 ± 1.3 and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.9 ± 0.8. ICE-guided 100% transseptal puncture success rate was 100% with 98.5% of overall procedural success rate. Preprocedural CTA sizing strategy accurately predicted the implanted size in 91.1% of patients. Ten patients (7.4%) required another sized device and 2 cases were aborted. At 45-day follow-up, only 1 patient (0.7%) had significant peri-device leak (≥5 mm) on TEE. CONCLUSIONS: CTA-based preprocedural sizing methodology for WATCHMAN™ FLX in LAAC was safe, feasible and associated with excellent procedural outcomes. Further studies are warranted to confirm if the features specific to TruPlan™ may reduce the number of deployment attempts, the number of devices utilized in the procedure, and the risk of complications.

Atrial flutter mimicking ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

A 12 lead electrocardiogram provides an important diagnostic tool for atrial flutter recognition. However, rarely, atrial flutter waves can cause diagnostic challenges by producing ST segment abnormalities mimicking ST segment elevation and result in unnecessary workup and treatment. ​.

Chronic Aortocaval Fistula Presenting as Right Heart Failure: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Iatrogenic aortocaval fistula (ACF) is an infrequent cause of heart failure. A 65-year-old man presented to the cardiology clinic eight months after an open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. He developed predominantly right-sided cardiac failure after surgery, with minimal response to guideline-directed medical therapy. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed decreased right-sided systolic function. A computed tomography angiographic scan of the abdomen revealed a large ACF at the distal end of the AAA repair. The patient was referred for closure surgery. ACF should be considered in a patient with unexplained right heart failure, especially in the setting of a known AAA or recent AAA repair.

Supraventricular tachycardia with the use of phentermine: case report and review of literature.

Case: A 34-year-old woman with no significant past medical history presented to the hospital with sudden onset of palpitations with associated dyspnea and chest discomfort. She denied any similar previous episodes. Initial electrocardiogram (EKG) was consistent with a short R-P interval supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Her transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed no structural abnormalities, TSH levels were normal, and urine drug screen was negative for any recreational drugs. However, the patient had been taking phentermine for weight loss.Discussion: The exact mechanism is not clear; however, we postulate that the sympathomimetic effects of phentermine likely contribute to SVT induction through enhanced AV nodal conduction or increased atrial ectopy. Conclusions: The only medication she was taking at home was phentermine, and the palpitations did not recur after discontinuation of the drug during follow-up. It is important to collect a thorough medication history when patients present with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) or other SVT.

Escitalopram Induced Torsade de Pointes and Cardiac Arrest in a Patient With Surgically Treated Mitral Valve Prolapse.

A 54-year-old female, with a history of prosthetic mitral valve replacement due to mitral valve prolapse one year prior, was admitted after suffering a cardiopulmonary arrest. Her initial rhythm demonstrated Torsade de Pointes with the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showing a prolonged QT interval. Laboratory test results were normal including potassium and magnesium serum levels, and imaging did not show significant abnormalities. A review of patients' medicines showed that the patient started taking escitalopram one month prior to the presentation for major depressive disorder. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are widely prescribed and continue to be a mainstay of treatment for multiple psychiatric conditions. It is important to keep the potential cardiovascular side effects of SSRIs in mind when prescribing. Consideration of underlying cardiac conditions is vital to decrease the likelihood of poor outcomes.