Ensuring accountability in implementation of supplementary immunisation activities: A case study of the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign in Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: Globally, there is a growing concern with accountability and health systems. This has been attributed majorly to discontent with health system performance. Within the Nigerian health system, weak accountability has been consistently singled out as a key challenge underpinning the poor performance of the immunisation programme. In preparation for the 2017/2018 Measles Vaccination Campaign in Nigeria, the National Measles Technical Coordinating Committee (NMTCC) was inaugurated with one of its key mandates being to ensure accountability in the conduct of the 2017/2018 MVC. This paper aims to share the innovative measures applied in the 2017/2018 Measles MVC to improve accountability and to highlight the contribution of the accountability framework to improving measles vaccination coverage. METHODS: We identified gaps in accountability from the post-campaign coverage reports and reviews of previous campaigns. We adapted an accountability framework developed by the Nigeria National Routine Immunization Strategic Plan (2013-2015),- which cuts across all levels. Selected indicators were used to monitor the implementation of the framework. Administrative actions such as sanctions and rewards were taken as necessary. FINDINGS: We found that the implementation of the accountability framework was highly instrumental in achieving a high level of coordination among all stakeholders and to improving efficient utilization of resources. We also found that the implementation of the accountability framework in the 2017/2018 MVC contributed to the improved performance of states in terms of measles vaccination coverage compared to the 2015/2016 campaign. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the implementation of the accountability framework in the 2017/2018 MVC led to a considerable reduction in the misuse and abuse of resources and also contributed to remarkable improvement in the measles vaccination coverages across states compared to the 2015/2016 MVC.

Application of the Geographic Information System (GIS) in immunisation service delivery; its use in the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: As global effort is made towards measles elimination, the use of innovative technology to enhance planning for the campaign has become critical. GIS technology has been applied to track polio vaccination activities in Nigeria with encouraging outcomes. Despite numerous measles vaccination campaigns after the first catch up campaign in 2005, sub-optimal outcomes of previous measles supplemental immunization activities necessitated the use of innovative ideas to achieve better outcomes especially when planning for the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign. This led to the application of the use of the GIS technology for the Northern states in 2017/2018 campaign. This study is a report of what was achieved with the use of the GIS in the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign in Nigeria. METHODS: GIS generated ward maps were used for the microplanning processes for the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign. These ward maps had estimates of the target population by settlements, the number and location of vaccination posts ensuring that a vaccination post is sited within one-kilometer radius of a settlement, and the number of teams needed to support the vaccination campaign as well as the catchment area and daily implementation plans. The ward microplans were verified by checking for accuracy and consistency of the target population, settlements, number of teams, vaccination posts and daily implementation work plans using a standard checklist. The ward maps were deployed into use for the measles vaccination campaign after the state team driven validation and verification by the National team (Government and Partners) RESULTS: The Northern states that applied the GIS technology had a closer operational target population to that on the verified microplan than those of the non-GIS technology states. Greater than 90% of the ward maps had all that is expected in the maps - i.e settlements, target populations, and vaccination posts captured, except Kaduna, Katsina and Adamawa states. Of all enumeration areas sampled during the post-campaign survey in states with GIS ward maps, none had a zero-vaccination coverage of the surveyed children, with the exception of one in Borno state that had security issues. In the post campaign coverage survey, the percentage of responses that gave vaccination post being too far as a reason for non-vaccination of children in the Northern zones that used GIS generated ward maps was less than half the rate seen in the southern zones where the GIS microplanning was not used. CONCLUSION: The use of GIS-generated wards maps improved the quality of ward micro plans and optimized the placement of vaccination posts, resulting in a significant reduction in zero-dose clusters found during the post campaign coverage survey.

Using data to improve outcomes of supplemental immunisation activities: 2017/2018 Nigeria measles vaccination campaign.

BACKGROUND: Despite the enormous resources committed to the implementation of supplemental immunisation activities in Nigeria, achieving the required coverage (post-campaign survey) to halt the transmission of vaccine-preventable diseases has continued to seem like an impossibility. A vast volume of data is generated and transmitted during mass vaccination campaigns, but this administrative data does not always culminate into improved coverage. The absence of data-informed guidance from stakeholders with long years of experience in planning and implementing mass vaccination campaigns has impeded achieving 95% coverage in measles campaigns in Nigeria. This study reviews the use of data to guide the implementation of the 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign in Nigeria. METHODS: A central coordinating body was formed at the national level with the same replicated in every state. Tools were developed to measure the performance of the different phases and activities required for the implementation of a mass vaccination campaign as recommended in the international guidelines. Stakeholders were engaged to help ensure that feedback provided by the national measles technical coordinating committee was implemented at the lower level. RESULTS: Monitoring and analysis of daily data submission caused a proper spread of senior supervisors, vaccination posts location during the campaign and helped identify areas targeted for mop-up. Although the verification of states' microplan increased the operational target population by 11.2%, the process aided the distribution of resources as appropriate. Maps showing the likely areas that needed additional effort to achieve required coverage with recommendation on the necessary approach to be deployed were transmitted to the states implementing the campaign. CONCLUSION: The improvement in the use of data to guide implementation of the Nigeria 2017/2018 measles vaccination campaign caused an increase in the number of states that achieved higher coverage in the post-campaign coverage survey.

Optimization of frequency and targeting of measles supplemental immunization activities in Nigeria: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Measles causes significant childhood morbidity in Nigeria. Routine immunization (RI) coverage is around 40% country-wide, with very high levels of spatial heterogeneity (3-86%), with supplemental immunization activities (SIAs) at 2-year or 3-year intervals. We investigated cost savings and burden reduction that could be achieved by adjusting the inter-campaign interval by region. METHODS: We modeled 81 scenarios; permuting SIA calendars of every one, two, or three years in each of four regions of Nigeria (North-west, North-central, North-east, and South). We used an agent-based disease transmission model to estimate the number of measles cases and ingredients-based cost models to estimate RI and SIA costs for each scenario over a 10 year period. RESULTS: Decreasing SIAs to every three years in the North-central and South (regions of above national-average RI coverage) while increasing to every year in either the North-east or North-west (regions of below national-average RI coverage) would avert measles cases (0.4 or 1.4 million, respectively), and save vaccination costs (save $19.4 or $5.4 million, respectively), compared to a base-case of national SIAs every two years. Decreasing SIA frequency to every three years in the South while increasing to every year in the just the North-west, or in all Northern regions would prevent more cases (2.1 or 5.0 million, respectively), but would increase vaccination costs (add $3.5 million or $34.6 million, respectively), for $1.65 or $6.99 per case averted, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our modeling shows how increasing SIA frequency in Northern regions, where RI is low and birth rates are high, while decreasing frequency in the South of Nigeria would reduce the number of measles cases with relatively little or no increase in vaccination costs. A national vaccination strategy that incorporates regional SIA targeting in contexts with a high level of sub-national variation would lead to improved health outcomes and/or lower costs.