Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Imaging ; 59(2): 114-118, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31816537

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe our 3-year experience operating a peer learning program with minimal resources, calculate the cost of the program, and compare participants' attitudes toward peer learning to the historical peer review system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peer learning conference is held monthly for 1 h via a web-based video conferencing platform. Case identification, curation, and conference presentation are performed by individual radiologists. Using national estimates for unit costs of radiologist time and other inputs, we calculated the marginal cost of the peer learning program to the medical group. After 21 months of holding the conference, we conducted an anonymous survey to assess the impact of the conference and how it may be improved. RESULTS: A peer learning conference was established for a 24- person community-based practice, which is part of a large multi-disciplinary medical group. Cases discussed included diagnostic errors, technologist errors, good calls, and challenging cases. Total annual cost of the program is $3288. Survey respondents had overall positive views of the conference and strongly preferred peer learning to the existing peer review system in place, with 80% of respondents rating peer learning more favorably than peer review on education value, supportive environment, and punitive process, and 70% more positively on culture of blaming. CONCLUSION: We established a peer learning program with minimal resources. Radiologists in the group strongly prefer the peer learning conference over the existing peer review program in place. A peer learning program can be successfully started and sustained with limited resources.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Peer Group , Radiology/education , Videoconferencing , Humans , Peer Review , Radiologists
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 193(6 Suppl): S79-89, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19933680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as increased costs and medicolegal consequences. This article reviews some of the most commonly retained surgical devices and provides a structured approach to intraoperative image acquisition and interpretation. By increasing the awareness of surgically placed foreign bodies, our goal is to reduce the incidence of and the complications associated with this difficult clinical problem. CONCLUSION: Despite various systems and safeguards available, unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies remain difficult to eliminate completely. Developing a standardized approach to the request, "intraoperative film, rule out foreign body," is essential to reduce the adverse outcomes associated with this problem.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/prevention & control , Surgical Instruments , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Abdominal , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 193(6 Suppl): S90-3, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19933681

ABSTRACT

The educational objectives of this self-assessment module are for the reader to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her skills in diagnostic radiology with respect to the imaging of unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies and to develop a standardized approach to the request for intraoperative imaging to rule out a foreign body.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/prevention & control , Surgical Instruments , Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiography, Abdominal , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Comput Med Imaging Graph ; 27(2-3): 129-35, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12620303

ABSTRACT

The United States Department of Defense (DOD) has played a leading role in the movement of digital imaging, picture archiving and communications systems, and more recently telemedicine with its associated technologies into the mainstream of healthcare. Beginning in the 1980s with domestic implementations, and followed in the 1990s by both small and large-scale military deployments, these technologies have been put into action with varying degrees of success. These efforts however, have always served as a guidepost for similar civilian efforts and the establishment of a marketplace for the technologies. This paper examines the history of the DOD's role in these areas, the projects and programs established, assessing their current state of development and identifying the future direction of the DOD's research and implementation efforts in telemedicine and advanced medical technologies.


Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Military Medicine/trends , Radiology Information Systems/trends , Teleradiology/trends , United States Government Agencies , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...