Strategic reprogramming of implantable cardiac monitors reduces the false-positive remote alert burden in a nurse-led service.

AIMS: Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) can generate false-positive (FP) alerts. Although these devices have an extended programmability, there are no recommendations on their optimization to reduce not-relevant activations.We tested a strategic programming optimization guide based on the type of FP and investigated the safety and feasibility of the nurse-led insertion of ICMs with a long-sensing vector. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients implanted by trained nurses with long-sensing vector ICM were enrolled in a 1-month observational stage (Phase A). Patients who had ≥10 FP episodes underwent ICM reprogramming based on the predefined guide and were followed for an additional month (Phase B). A total of 78 patients had successful ICM insertion by nurses with a mean R wave amplitude of 0.96 ± 0.43 mV and an 86% P wave visibility. Only one patient reported a significant device-related issue, and nurse-delivered ICM was generally well accepted by the patients. During Phase A, 11 patients (14%) generated most of FP (3,627/3,849; 94%) and underwent ICM reprogramming. In the following month (Phase B), five patients (45%) were free from FP and six (55%) transmitted 57 FP alerts (98% reduction compared with Phase A). The median number of FP per patient was significantly reduced after reprogramming [195 (interquartile range, 50-311) vs. one (0-10), P = 0.0002]. CONCLUSION: A strategic reprogramming of ICM in those patients with a high FP alert burden reduces the volume of erroneous activations with potential benefits for the remote monitoring service. No concerns were raised regarding nurse-led insertion of ICMs with a long-sensing vector.

Endocavitary electrophysiological study by percutaneous antecubital vein and without X-ray for risk stratification of asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation in young athletes.

Athletes with asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation (VP) should undergo electrophysiological study for risk stratification. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety and tolerability of an electrophysiological study using a percutaneous antecubital vein access and without the use of X-ray (ESnoXr). Methods: We collected data from all young athletes < 18 year-old with AVP, who underwent ESnoXr from January 2000 to September 2020 for evaluation of accessory pathway refractoriness and arrhythmia inducibility using an antecubital percutaneous venous access. Endocavitary signals were used to advance the catheter in the right atrium and ventricle. Results: We included 63 consecutive young athletes (mean age 14.6 ± 1.9 years, 46% male). Feasibility of the ESnoXr technique was 87% while in 13% fluoroscopy and/or a femoral approach were needed. Specifically, fluoroscopy was used in 7 cases to position the catheter inside the heart cavities with an average exposure of 43 ± 38 s while in 2 femoral venous access was needed. The mean procedural time was 35 ± 11 min. The exam was diagnostic in all patients, there were no procedural complications and tolerability was excellent. 53% of the patients had an accessory pathway with high refractoriness and no inducible atrio-ventricular reentry tachycardia: this subgroup was considered eligible to competitive sports and no event was observed during long-term follow-up (13.6 ± 5.2 years) without drug use. The others underwent catheter ablation. Conclusion. ESnoXr has been shown to be a feasible, effective, safe and well-tolerated procedure for the assessment of arrhythmic risk in a population of young athletes with asymptomatic VP.

Scheduled versus alert transmissions for remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Clinical relevance and resource consumption.

BACKGROUND: The remote follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) usually includes scheduled checks and alert transmissions. However, this results in a high volume of remote data reviews to be managed. We measured the relative contribution of scheduled and alert transmissions to the detection of relevant conditions, and the workload generated by their management. METHODS: At our center, the frequency of remote scheduled transmissions is 4/year. Moreover, all system-integrity and clinical alerts are turned on for wireless notification. We calculated the number of transmissions received from January to December 2020, and identified transmissions that necessitated in-hospital access for further assessment and transmissions that required clinical discussion with the physician. For all alert transmissions, we identified whether the alert was clinically meaningful (i.e. center was not previously aware of the condition and no action had yet been taken to treat it). RESULTS: Of 8545 transmissions received from 1697 pacemakers and ICDs, 5766 (67%) were scheduled and 2779 (33%) were alert transmissions received from 764 patients (45%); 499 (9%) scheduled transmissions required clinical discussion with the physician, but only 2 of these necessitated in-hospital visits for further assessment. Of the alert transmissions, 664 (24%) required clinical discussion, and 75 (3%) necessitated in-hospital visits. The proportion of alerts judged clinically meaningful was 7%. CONCLUSION: Scheduled transmissions generate 67% of remote data reviews for pacemakers and ICDs, but their ability to detect clinically relevant events is very low. A strategy that relies exclusively on alert transmissions could ensure continuity of patient monitoring while reducing the workload at the center.

Implementation of remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices in clinical practice: organizational implications and resource consumption.

AIMS: Current guidelines recommend remote follow-up for all patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. However, the introduction of a remote follow-up service requires specifically dedicated organization. We evaluated the impact of adopting remote follow-up on the organization of a clinic and we measured healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: In 2016, we started the implementation of the remote follow-up service. Each patient was assigned to an experienced nurse and a doctor in charge with preestablished tasks and responsibilities. During 2016 and 2017, all patients on active follow-up at our center were included in the service; since 2018, the service has been fully operational for all patients following postimplantation hospital discharge. RESULTS: As of December 2018, 2024 patients were on active follow-up at the center. Of these, 93% of patients were remotely monitored according to the established protocol. The transmission rates were: 5.3/patient-year for pacemakers, 6.0/patient-year for defibrillators, and 14.1/patient-year for loop recorders. Only 21% of transmissions were submitted to the physician for further clinical evaluation, and 3% of transmissions necessitated an unplanned in-hospital visit for further assessment. Clinical events of any type were detected in 39% of transmissions. Overall, the nurses' total workload was 3596 h per year, that is, 1.95 full-time equivalent, which resulted in 1038 patients/nurse. The total workload for physicians was 526 h per year, that is, 0.29 full-time equivalent. After 1 year on follow-up, most patients judged the service positively and expressed their preference for the new follow-up approach. CONCLUSION: A remote follow-up service can be implemented and efficiently managed by nursing staff with minimal physician support. Patients are followed up with greater continuity and seem to appreciate the service.

Coronary sinus and great cardiac vein electroanatomic mapping predicts the activation delay of the coronary sinus branches.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of left ventricular (LV) lead in segments with delayed electrical activation may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The search for the latest LV electrical delay (LVED) site can be time-consuming. OBJECTIVE: To assess if electrical mapping of coronary sinus (CS) and magna cardiac vein can help to identify the latest activated CS branch. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 48 consecutive patients who underwent electroanatomic mapping system-guided (EAMS)-CRT device implantation with ≥2 mapped CS branches. The activation mapping of the CS and relative branches were performed using an insulated guide wire. LVED was defined as the interval between the beginning of the QRS complex on the surface electrocardiogram and the local electrogram and expressed in milliseconds (ms). RESULTS: Thirty-two (67%) patients showed left bundle branch block (LBBB) and 16 (33%) non-LBBB electrocardiographic patterns. A total of 116 CS branches (mean, 2.4/patient; range, 2-5) were mapped. In the left oblique view, most patients (N = 39, 81%) showed the latest CS-LVED in lateral segments while nine (19%) showed the latest CS-LVED in anterior or posterior segments. Specifically, 94% of patients with LBBB showed the latest CS-LVED in lateral segments while CS activation among non-LBBB patients was heterogeneous. In all patients, the CS branch that demonstrated the highest LVED originated from the latest activated segment of the CS. CONCLUSION: Electrical mapping of CS allows identifying the latest activated branches. This finding may contribute to simplify CRT device implantation compared to activation mapping of all the branches.

Epicardial left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients via a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique: Long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead via a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) approach is an alternative to the standard transvenous technique. HYPOTHESIS: Long-term safety and efficacy of VAT and transvenous LV lead implantation are comparable. To test it, we reviewed our experience and we compared the outcomes of patients who underwent implantation with the two techniques. METHODS: The VAT procedure is performed under general anesthesia, with oro-tracheal intubation and right-sided ventilation, and requires two 5 mm and one 15 mm thoracoscopic ports. After pericardiotomy at the spot of the epicardial target area, pacing measurements are taken and a spiral screw electrode is anchored at the final pacing site. The electrode is then tunneled to the pectoral pocket and connected to the device. RESULTS: 105 patients were referred to our center for epicardial LV lead implantation. After pre-operative assessment, 5 patients were excluded because of concomitant conditions precluding surgery. The remaining 100 underwent the procedure. LV lead implantation was successful in all patients (median pacing threshold 0.8 ± 0.5 V, no phrenic nerve stimulation) and cardiac resynchronization therapy was established in all but one patient. The median procedure time was 75 min. During a median follow-up of 24 months, there were no differences in terms of death, cardiovascular hospitalizations or device-related complications vs the group of 100 patients who had undergone transvenous implantation. Patients of both groups displayed similar improvements in terms of ventricular reverse remodeling and functional status. CONCLUSIONS: Our VAT approach proved safe and effective, and is a viable alternative in the case of failed transvenous LV implantation.