Dietitian-supported dietary intervention leads to favorable dietary changes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: It remains to be fully elucidated whether nutrition education by dietitians can lead to specific positive changes in the food choices of patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease were randomly assigned to the intensive intervention group that received nutritional education at every outpatient visit and the control group that received nutritional education once a year. The total energy intake, energy-providing nutrients and 18 food groups were analyzed at baseline, and 1 and 2 years after the intervention in 87 patients. Furthermore, the relationship between the changes in hemoglobin A1c, body composition and changes in the total energy or energy-producing nutrient intake was analyzed in 48 patients who did not use or change hypoglycemic agents during the study period. RESULTS: The total energy intake, carbohydrates, cereals, confections, nuts and seeds, and seasonings significantly decreased, and fish and shellfish intake significantly increased during the study period in the intensive intervention group, whereas these changes were not observed in the control group. The decrease in the total energy intake and carbohydrates after 2 years was significantly greater in the intensive intervention group than in the control group. The change in the total energy and carbohydrate intake showed a significant positive correlation with that in muscle mass. The multivariate analysis showed that the decrease in total energy intake was independently associated with that in muscle mass. CONCLUSION: Dietitian-supported intensive dietary intervention helps improve the diet of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of the effects of frequent versus conventional nutritional interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether frequent nutritional education improves the clinical parameters associated with the onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease were randomly assigned to the intensive intervention group that received nutritional education at every outpatient visit, and the usual intervention group that received nutritional education once a year. The anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, blood chemistry, albuminuria, protein and salt intake, and prescribed medications of 87 patients who completed the 2-year follow up were analyzed. RESULTS: In the intensive intervention group, body mass index and salt intake significantly decreased over the study period. Hemoglobin A1c levels and body fat percentage were significantly lower in the intensive intervention group than in the usual intervention group. At the end of the 2-year intervention period, the intensive intervention group had significantly lower salt intake (8.1 vs 9.4 g/day) than the usual intervention group. A significant positive correlation was found between salt intake and albuminuria in the overall group and intensive intervention group (r = 0.26, P = 0.02, and r = 0.36, P = 0.02, respectively). The intensive intervention group had a significantly lower insulin use rate than the usual intervention group after the 2-year intervention period (18% vs 42%). No differences were found in estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria. CONCLUSION: Intensive nutritional education is useful for alleviating the risk factors associated with the onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease.

Factors affecting the progression of renal dysfunction and the importance of salt restriction in patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage renal failure, and the prevention of its progression has been a topic of discussion. METHODS: Sixty type 2 DKD patients were retrospectively evaluated for 1 year. Factors independently affecting the annual Ccr decline were examined by multivariable linear regression analysis. Patients were further divided into 2 groups based on their degree of renal function, and between-group differences at study initiation were evaluated. RESULTS: Ccr values were 21.0 ± 11.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at study initiation, and 15.7 ± 10.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after 1 year of observation. The multivariable linear regression analysis indicated salt intake (standardized coefficient: -0.34, P = 0.010) and urinary protein excretion (standardized coefficient: -0.33, P = 0.011) to be factors independently affecting the annual Ccr decline. Although decliners (-9.8 ± 4.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) had a significantly higher salt intake than non-decliners (-1.1 ± 3.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) at study initiation, this difference disappeared at the end of the study as a result of intensive dietary education. In 21 decliners with an additional year of follow-up, the annual Ccr decline significantly improved from -10.1 ± 5.3 to -5.3 ± 7.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Salt intake and urinary protein excretion were associated with annual Ccr decline in type 2 DKD patients. Furthermore, dietary education covering salt intake may have positively affected the change in Ccr.