Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 169(3): 594-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23647170

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal mucosal melanomas (GAMMs) are rare compared with cutaneous melanoma (CM). Many epidemiological and genetic studies have been carried out on CM. In contrast, the genetic and environmental risk factors for GAMM have been poorly documented up to now. OBJECTIVES: To compare the distribution of pigmentation and naevus phenotypes, sun exposure and family history of melanoma between patients with GAMM and CM. METHODS: We compared two series of patients, 81 with GAMM and 293 with CM. RESULTS: Patients with GAMM and CM did not show significant differences for phenotypic risk factors. However, patients with GAMM tended to display red hair (11% vs. 5·5%, P = 0·08) and a poor tanning ability (22% vs. 13·3%, P = 0·06) at a higher frequency than patients with CM. A family history of melanoma was significantly more frequent with GAMM than with CM (18% vs. 7·5%, P = 0·005). Apart from the GAMM index case, affected relatives had CM except in one family. The frequency of multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) was similar in the GAMM and CM series (6% vs. 5·3%, P = 0·43). All patients with GAMM and MPM had only one GAMM primary, while the other primary was cutaneous. No CDKN2A germline mutation was detected in patients with GAMM. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that GAMM and CM may occur in the same patient, and GAMM may develop in a familial setting. The association of both GAMM and CM in patients and families suggests shared genetic factors by these two types of melanoma.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/genetics , Genital Neoplasms, Female/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Rectal Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Anus Neoplasms/complications , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa , Male , Melanoma/complications , Middle Aged , Nevus/complications , Nevus/genetics , Pedigree , Phenotype , Pigmentation Disorders/complications , Pigmentation Disorders/genetics , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/complications
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 102(20): 1568-83, 2010 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20876876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Carrying the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) germline mutations is associated with a high risk for melanoma. Penetrance of CDKN2A mutations is modified by pigmentation characteristics, nevus phenotypes, and some variants of the melanocortin-1 receptor gene (MC1R), which is known to have a role in the pigmentation process. However, investigation of the associations of both MC1R variants and host phenotypes with melanoma risk has been limited. METHODS: We included 815 CDKN2A mutation carriers (473 affected, and 342 unaffected, with melanoma) from 186 families from 15 centers in Europe, North America, and Australia who participated in the Melanoma Genetics Consortium. In this family-based study, we assessed the associations of the four most frequent MC1R variants (V60L, V92M, R151C, and R160W) and the number of variants (1, ≥2 variants), alone or jointly with the host phenotypes (hair color, propensity to sunburn, and number of nevi), with melanoma risk in CDKN2A mutation carriers. These associations were estimated and tested using generalized estimating equations. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Carrying any one of the four most frequent MC1R variants (V60L, V92M, R151C, R160W) in CDKN2A mutation carriers was associated with a statistically significantly increased risk for melanoma across all continents (1.24 × 10(-6) ≤ P ≤ .0007). A consistent pattern of increase in melanoma risk was also associated with increase in number of MC1R variants. The risk of melanoma associated with at least two MC1R variants was 2.6-fold higher than the risk associated with only one variant (odds ratio = 5.83 [95% confidence interval = 3.60 to 9.46] vs 2.25 [95% confidence interval = 1.44 to 3.52]; P(trend) = 1.86 × 10(-8)). The joint analysis of MC1R variants and host phenotypes showed statistically significant associations of melanoma risk, together with MC1R variants (.0001 ≤ P ≤ .04), hair color (.006 ≤ P ≤ .06), and number of nevi (6.9 × 10(-6) ≤ P ≤ .02). CONCLUSION: Results show that MC1R variants, hair color, and number of nevi were jointly associated with melanoma risk in CDKN2A mutation carriers. This joint association may have important consequences for risk assessments in familial settings.


Subject(s)
Genes, p16 , Heterozygote , Melanoma/genetics , Mutation , Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 1/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Australia , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/genetics , Europe , Female , Hair Color , Humans , Male , Nevus/complications , Nevus/genetics , North America , Phenotype , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Skin Pigmentation , Sunburn/complications , White People/genetics
3.
Fam Cancer ; 8(4): 371-7, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19484507

ABSTRACT

The effect of CDKN2A, the major high-risk melanoma susceptibility gene, has been shown to be modified by host-related phenotypes and variants of MC1R gene. The glutathione S-transferase (GSTs) genes, implicated in detoxification of metabolites after UV exposure, are candidates for modulating CDKN2A penetrance. Few case-control studies have investigated the effect of GSTs on melanoma risk, and have led to controversial results while these genes have not yet been studied in CDKN2A melanoma-prone families. We examined the effect of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on melanoma risk in 25 multi-generational melanoma-prone families with CDKN2A mutations, in presence of MC1R gene variants, sun exposure, and host-related phenotypes. These data included 195 genotyped subjects for all studied genes. We applied the GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations) approach to test for the effect of GSTs while adjusting for age, sex and CDKN2A mutation status and including successively MC1R, sun exposure and host factors in the model. No significant effect of null GSTM1 allele and GSTP1 variants (p.I105V, p.A114V) on melanoma risk was found. However, a significant protective effect of carrying >or=1 null GSTT1 allele was shown: OR(adjusted for age,sex,CDKN2A ) = 0.41 (0.18-0.94) and OR(adjusted for age,sex,CDKN2A,MC1R ) = 0.24 (0.15-0.58). Altogether, the factors modifying significantly the melanoma risk associated with CDKN2A mutations (stepwise procedure) were: MC1R and dysplastic nevi (increasing the risk) and GSTT1 (decreasing the risk). This study shows that even when a high-risk gene (CDKN2A) has been identified, multiple genetic modifiers influence melanoma risk.


Subject(s)
Genes, p16 , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 1/genetics , Adult , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Glutathione S-Transferase pi/genetics , Humans , Male , Mutation , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...