Isolated right atrial rupture from blunt trauma: a case report with systematic review of a lethal injury.

BACKGROUND: Isolated right atrial rupture (IRAR) from blunt chest trauma is rare. There are no physical exam findings and non-invasive testing specific to the condition, which result in diagnostic delays and poor outcomes. We present a case of IRAR along with a systematic review of similar cases in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old male presented following a motor vehicle accident (MVA). He was bradycardic and hypotensive during transportation; and required intubation. There were contusions along the right chest wall with clear breath sounds, and no jugular venous distension, muffled heart sounds. Hemodynamic status progressively worsened, ultimately leading to his death. However, no external sources of bleeding or evidence of cardiac tamponade was found. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library using: (Blunt OR Blunt trauma) AND (Laceration OR Rupture OR Tear) AND (Right Atrium OR Right Atrial). Articles were included if they were original articles describing cases of IRAR. RESULTS: Forty-five reports comprising seventy-five (n = 75) cases of IRAR. CONCLUSION: IRAR most commonly occurs following MVAs as the result of blunt chest trauma. Rupture occurs at four distinct sites and is most commonly at the right atrial appendage. IRAR is a diagnostic challenge and requires a high index of suspicion, as patients' hemodynamics can rapidly deteriorate. The presentations vary depending on multiple factors including rupture size, pericardial integrity, and concomitant injuries. Cardiac tamponade may have a protective effect by prompting the search for a bleeding source. A pericardial window can be diagnostic and therapeutic in IRAR. Outcomes are favourable with timely recognition and prompt surgical intervention.

Too Hot for Your Pocket! Burns From E-Cigarette Lithium Battery Explosions: A Case Series.

The use of electronic cigarettes (ECs) has been on the rise with increased number of battery explosions causing burns. This study is a retrospective review of patients who presented with burns caused by EC explosions.Here, we present a case series of eight patients sustaining burns from EC explosions, within a year, to elucidate the pattern of such burns and to provide a treatment guideline.All of them were males. Five patients had partial-thickness burns and three had full-thickness burns. TBSA ranged from 4 to 16% (burns to lower extremity [n = 7], hand [n =3], scrotum/penis [n =2], chest [n = 1]). None had inhalation injuries. Two patients (29%) required skin grafting. EC explosion is predominantly attributed to its lithium-ion battery. Several types of injuries can occur, including chemical and thermal burns, inhalation injuries, metal poisoning, etc. There are currently no specific guidelines on the management of burns due to lithium-ion battery exposure. Herein, we recommend the following: Initial assessment of injuries should accompany the Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines; serum levels of lithium, cobalt, and manganese should be checked and elevated levels should be monitored; patients should be monitored for signs of metal toxicity; wound should be extensively debrided and irrigated to remove any residual materials; and litmus test should be performed to check for alkali pH prior to irrigation with water or other aqueous solutions.

The Feasibility of Venovenous ECMO at Role-2 Facilities in Austere Military Environments.

INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been gaining use to bridge the recovery from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional treatment. However, these interventions are often limited to higher echelons of military care. We present a case of lung salvage from severe ARDS in an Afghani soldier with VV-ECMO at a Role-2 (R2) facility in an austere military environment in Afghanistan. CASE: A 25-year-old Afghani soldier presented to an R2 facility with blast lung injury and multiple penetrating injuries following an explosion. The patient underwent immediate damage control laparotomy. The abdomen was left open for subsequent washouts and ongoing resuscitation. Due to his ineligibility for evacuation and worsening ARDS, despite 5 d of conventional ventilation strategies, he was started on VV-ECMO. The patient had immediate improvements in oxygenation, which continued for 10 d. Moreover, he underwent three transportations to the operating room without accidental decannulation or disruption of the VV-ECMO device. Despite significant improvements, the patient expired on postoperative day 15, due to an overwhelming intra-abdominal sepsis. CONCLUSION: As future advancements are sought, VV-ECMO may become a consideration for casualties with severe ARDS at the point of injury and at lower echelons of military care.